ну чо, как неделю заканчиваете? ❤️🔥 ахуенно все 💩 уничтожен 🖕 пососал ☺️ заканчиваю? мне еще все выхи ебашить
custom 521296718057600804441💩31❤🔥17custom 546074211730535912317

Channel
@sweetmartinvacancies
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
3,858subscribers
+75 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003023946181 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sweetmartinvacancies |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sweetmartinvacancies |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:28 | 3,858 | +19 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:58 | 3,839 | +24 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 19:02 | 3,815 | +27 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:27 | 3,788 | +5 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 3,783 | first reading |
30 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 27 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 30 (29 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 31,224 |
| Reactions total | 817 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 8 Aug 2026, 06:13 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
706 reactions across 22 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 190 | 26.9% | |
| 💩 | 147 | 20.8% | |
| custom 5212967180576008044 | 129 | 18.3% | |
| custom 5460742117305359123 | 121 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5213465048889988806 | 71 | 10.1% | |
| custom 5213003717862791345 | 48 | 6.80% |
Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 27 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 817reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
ну чо, как неделю заканчиваете? ❤️🔥 ахуенно все 💩 уничтожен 🖕 пососал ☺️ заканчиваю? мне еще все выхи ебашить
custom 521296718057600804441💩31❤🔥17custom 546074211730535912317
Заканчиваем марафон фАуНдЕрСкИх размышлений Был рад увидеть вашу вовлечённость, комментарии и даже добрые дискуссии. Надо будет как-нибудь снова сюда прийти А напоследок подарок: лучший бесплатный навигационный шрифт с кириллицей — Guidy Мы выпустили его два месяца назад, а в этом году планируем дообновить и расширить. Скоро все будет, следите 🚧ведутся буквенные работы🚧
custom 521300371786279134512custom 54607421173053591234❤🔥1custom 52129671805760080441custom 52134650488899888061
Signed Collective Typeworks
Друзьяшки из студийной просят вам ету штучку показат
Signed Сладенький редактор
🎙 🎙 🫂🟰🎙 Студийная х дизайнерс, бесплатно и без смс, продвижение, закрыть KPI пиарщика Пиарщики, фаундеры и кто бы у вас там ни занимался продвижением агентства, аттенш! Есть маза как бесплатно получить бизнес-подписку для профиля на дизайнерс и посев по базе их каналов 🎙Что предлагаем Весь август принимаем ваши материалы через бота: @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. Это могут быть кейсы, статьи, мб какие-то текстовые тутор…
Signed Сладенький редактор
На что смотреть кроме самой вакансии? Или почему в ВК (возможно) идти не стоит Оформив ИП, я обнаружил насколько много данных о бизнесах есть в совершенно официальном открытом доступе. О почти любой организации (в том числе ИП) можно узнать кучу всего, просто имея ОГРН или название. И очень неплохая практика перед началом работы где-то проверять, а есть ли у них вообще (условно) деньги на вас? Так вот у нас такой …
custom 521346504888998880627custom 54607421173053591236❤🔥3
Signed matveijdidthat
Уже пробовали тгшный редактор статей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Signed matveijdidthat
Господи, какой же новый маркдаун редактор в тг кривой. Попытался ради интереса собрать прошлый пост в нём и это пытка. Собираешь текст с форматированием — на десктопе и мобилке выглядит очень по-разному. Добавил изображение — часть форматирования просто сбрасывается, да ещё и абзацные отступы воруют Пока с заметным скепсисом отношусь к этому куску вайб-кода, может надо его оседлать иначе
custom 54607421173053591235
Signed matveijdidthat
Posted without readable text
❤🔥9
Signed matveijdidthat
тряхну ка я стариной примерно лет 9 назад я впервые обозвал себя мультидизайнером, потому что делал всё подряд — и граф, и логотипы, и брендинг, и сайты, и прилы, и всё на свете. И вот казалось, я нашёл нужное слово, чтобы описать свою тонкую, ж-образную натуру! Но слово «дизайнер» уже несёт все нужные качества и означает, что ты мультидисциплинированный бай дефолт. А такие доп-слова скорее отпугивают, чем привлек…
custom 521300371786279134513custom 52134650488899888065💩2❤🔥1custom 54607421173053591231
Signed Векк
Начнём с рассуждения о мультидисциплинах и вакансии в ВТБ В какой-то момент понятие мультидисциплинарный звучало свежо. Будто бы вот он: тот самый эпитет для описания всей палитры навыков, которую в меня засунули за 4 года Школы Дизайна, круто! К сожалению, бизнесам тоже показалось это крутым и теперь мы имеем роль «мультидизайнер» Пройдёмся по тому, что от вас хотят: • Графдиз, высокий уровень, попрошу! • 3D модел…
custom 546074211730535912316❤🔥7💩3custom 52129671805760080441
Signed matveijdidthat
Привет-привет! Меня зовут Матвей и я запустил своё дело в 2026 году. Норм заход? Надеюсь, пойдет. Сегодня я с вами • 22 года на земле • Выпускник родильного дома №16 • Сооснователь Collective Typeworks • Букво-центричный дизайн • Веду канал matveijdidthat • ex старший графдиз TypeType • ex автор-редактор журнала «Поле» Признаюсь, я мало что нового могу сказать про вакансии. Мы тут с вами все имеем +- схожие взгляды…
❤🔥41💩2
Signed matveijdidthat
Ну что, сейчас все отдуплятся после отпусков, начнут обновлять портфолио и в РФ начнется сезон поиска работы. Работодатели по классике начнут донанимать спецов, чтобы успеть закрыть кпаи. В агентствах этот тоже период активности, потому что к ним ровно по той же причине нехватки ресурсов и приходят. Джунам, конечно, желательно уже 10 раз переработать свое портфолио и все такое. Сейчас особенно много нытья на рынке, …
💩34❤🔥7custom 52129671805760080441
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @sweetmartinvacancies. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Уже пробовали тгшный редактор статей?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
какие чувства ко вторнику?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
какие чувства к понедельнику?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 24,729 of 1,480,975entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 14 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@sweetmartinvacancies named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“сладенькие вакансии в дизайне” (@sweetmartinvacancies), 3,858 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sweetmartinvacancies.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.