Channel
@psd_eu
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
26,970subscribers
-97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001143336292 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @psd_eu |
| Description | Пишем просто, понятно и по делу обо всём околодизайнерском 🔥 Сайт: https://dsgners.ru По поводу рекламы и сотрудничества: @design_manager_bot Заявление № 4896031048 |
| Created | 24 August 2017 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/psd_eu |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 26,970 | -9 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 08:57 | 26,979 | -24 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:36 | 27,003 | -16 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:16 | 27,019 | -10 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 07:56 | 27,029 | -9 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 27,038 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 27,041 | -6 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 05:02 | 27,047 | -8 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:58 | 27,055 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:48 | 27,063 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:49 | 27,067 | first reading |
55 posts held, back to 24 August 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 55 (24 August 2017 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 10,289 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Создаём маскота для бренда с помощью нейросетей, без иллюстратора и 3D-моушн-дизайнера Узнайте, как использовать инструменты Krea и Nano Banana 2 для создания уникальных маскотов Relate. Создавайте идеальные позы и лицевые выражения для персонажей с легкостью Читать на дизайнерс | #урок
За каких дизайнеров будут держаться зубами Статья о возвращении Яны из "Арбуза" после долгого отсутствия. Кратко о прошлом, новых планах и почему читателям стоит следить за обновлениями Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Информационная архитектура кассовых чеков Исследуется возможность улучшить чек, не затрагивая фискальную систему и права бизнеса на добавление собственных сценариев Читать на дизайнерс | #кейс
Дайджест новостей в дизайне за неделю (08.08.26 — 14.08.26) Новости дизайна: ребрендинг 7UP, обновление Vans, новая айдентика Jordan Brand, редизайн упаковки Глисс Кур и другие интересные события в обзоре от Аформ Читать на дизайнерс | #дайджест
Как понять, что шаблон лучше сделать с нуля Иногда готовый шаблон мешает больше, чем помогает. Так бывает, если он слишком перегружен, плохо редактируется или изначально построен под другую задачу. Если на адаптацию уходит больше времени, чем на сборку с нуля — проще начать заново.
5 типов шаблонов, которые экономят больше всего времени Есть шаблоны, которые реально ускоряют работу каждый день. Это шаблоны для соцсетей, презентаций, лендингов, рекламных баннеров и кейсов в портфолио. Хороший шаблон экономит не только часы, но и силы на рутину.
Как не испортить дизайн из-за иконок Даже хорошие иконки могут всё испортить, если смешать слишком разные стили. Проблема обычно в том, что дизайнер берёт иконки из разных наборов и не проверяет визуальное единство. Перед использованием важно сравнить толщину линий, уровень детализации и геометрию.
Сайт за 5 минут с ИИ - это правда. Но не вся... Как написать скилл правильно Статья об исследовании времени, затраченного на выполнение заданий при работе с клиентскими брифами. Методика использования скиллов для оптимизации процесса Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
От баннера к спецпроекту: как ритейлу создавать коммуникации, которые хочется не пролистать, а изучить Статья рассказывает о том, что не все задачи в ритейле можно решить с помощью баннеров. Узнаете, какие коммуникации требуют другого подхода и как эффективно изменить отношение клиентов к продукту Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Pock Wallet Mobile App
Почему не стоит делать сайт с помощью нейросети Статья о том, как нейросети помогают в создании дизайна сайтов. Узнай, как их использование ускоряет и упрощает процесс разработки Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Пиксельный 👾 советский футуризм от keysixzero
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @psd_eu. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 642,821 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PSD | Дизайн-пространство” (@psd_eu), 26,970 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psd_eu.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.