Posted without readable text

Channel
Creative Motion
@creativemotion
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
21,556subscribers
-583 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001171545356 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @creativemotion |
| Description | Канал по анимационной графике, она же моушн-графика. Примеры визуального оформления, которое оживляет статическое изображение. По рекламе — @design_manager_bot Мы в реестре: https://vk.cc/cG5bQW |
| Created | 16 January 2018 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 35 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/creativemotion |
Topic
Art & design — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 65% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 20:58 | 21,556 | -65 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 02:17 | 21,621 | -27 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 18:42 | 21,648 | -12 |
| 14 Sept 2026, 19:56 | 21,660 | -20 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 06:19 | 21,680 | -10 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 11:18 | 21,690 | -22 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 20:38 | 21,712 | -53 |
| 5 Sept 2026, 10:37 | 21,765 | -17 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 13:16 | 21,782 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 07:38 | 21,788 | -17 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:29 | 21,805 | -11 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:13 | 21,816 | -5 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 08:18 | 21,821 | -6 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 06:02 | 21,827 | -9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:56 | 21,836 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 04:42 | 21,842 | -18 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 21,860 | -13 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 01:35 | 21,873 | -26 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 17:04 | 21,899 | -18 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 00:35 | 21,917 | first reading |
Engagement
121 posts held, back to 16 January 2018 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 61 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 3.21%
- avg views ÷ 21,556 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 692
- 8 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.166%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 8
- of 121 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 3 of 8 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 121 (16 January 2018 – 26 September 2026) |
| Views total | 5,539 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 27 Sept 2026, 04:17 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 10
- Videos
- 1
- Links
- 5
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 29m 58s
- Average length
- 51s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
21 reactions across 11 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👎 | 10 | 47.6% | |
| 👍 | 7 | 33.3% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 19.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 121 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 121 most recent posts we hold, published 16 January 2018 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Изменение цвета (или любого свойства) более 10 слоев фигур ❌ Делаете это вручную по одному (очень медленно) ✅ Добавляете «Null Object» и копируете свойства с помощью вкладки «Edit > Copy Property Links»
Создаём маскота для бренда с помощью нейросетей, без иллюстратора и 3D-моушн-дизайнера Бренд-дизайнер студии Relate показала весь путь — от первого скетча до готовой презентации клиенту, целиком в нейросетях, с промптами на каждом шаге Читать на дизайнерс | #AI
👎1
Как перенести осетинский ковёр в веб: сайт для всесезонного курорта Мамисон от Кавказ.РФ со своим Pinterest, AI-гидом на базе Yandex GPT и интерактивными картами горнолыжных трасс Студия дизайна и геймификации REB8T разработала сайт для курорта Мамисон в Северной Осетии — единое цифровое пространство, где собрана вся ключевая информация о курорте: интерактивная карта, статусы трасс и канатных дорог, отели и глэмпинг…
Почему через год дизайнеры будут работать без Figma Figma перестаёт быть центром работы. Ценность смещается туда, где ещё нет макета: разбор проблемы, исследования и работа с контекстом в Claude. Сборка экрана становится последним — и иногда необязательным — шагом. Читать на дизайнерс | #AI
Posted without readable text
Posted without readable text
👎1
Posted without readable text
👍1
Posted without readable text
Студийная × дизайнерс Август уже перевалил за экватор, а значит, пора проверить, все ли ваши публикации добрались до конкурса. Если с 1 по 30 августа у вас на дизайнерс вышли кейсы, статьи, туториалы, исследования, чек-листы или другие материалы — отправляйте ссылки в @StudiynayaDSGNERSbot. В конце месяца раздадим: 🎙 3 бизнес-подписки на дизайнерс на полгода + 3 посева по большой сетке каналов — за максимальное к…
Posted without readable text
Новость, которую вы точно не ждали Сейчас отовсюду кричат про AI, про необходимость дизайнеру проникаться этими технологиями. Кричат не зря, наверное это уже база, чтобы быть конкурентноспособными (да че говорить, если я сам помогаю делать дизайн раздела образования через клод). Уже начали появляться курсы и интенсивы, которые дают неплохой старт, для того что бы дизайнер встал на новые ai-рельсы. Пару месяцев наза…
Showing the 12 most recent of 121 posts we hold for @creativemotion. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@studiynaya · 1,1242 postsВидеоГуру | Монтаж, моушн-дизайн
@vidguru · 28,2192 postsAI BOOST'26 — 22-23.10: Digital agency by AGIMA
@agima_agencies · 7271 postдизайнерс
@dsgners · 19,2941 postШаблоны для Premiere Pro
@PremTemp · 47,8731 postREDKEDS
@REDKEDSAGENCY · 4,9711 postRelate Community&Studio
@relate_community · 8741 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
@c4study · 14,986#1
@a_study · 47,250#2
@design_telega · 79,070#3
@AETemp · 184,411#4
@vidguru · 28,219#5
@videosmile_ru · 27,021#6
@photoshopforyou · 65,163#7
@motionhunter · 28,021#8
@cgfreelance · 60,583#9
@photoshop_guru · 43,568#10
@CGclub · 5,484#11
@dsgn_box · 45,822#12
@design_awards · 21,910#13
@illustrt · 35,592#14
@prvtdsgn · 43,231#15
@designlessons · 12,936#16
@motion_club · 22,298#17
@secret_motion · 5,386#18
@designwrite · 13,810#19
@volnitsa_news · 10,527#20
@graphic_and_design · 23,235#21
@CGIOwl · 4,363#22
@pprostudy · 14,297#23
@prstpromotion · 5,792#24
@motion4d · 15,312#25
@Motion_ZIP · 17,379#26
@adver_best · 21,359#27
@dsgn_tutorial · 82,657#28
@Blend3d · 29,879#29
@behancerdsgn · 41,330#30
@designdealer · 86,726#31
@Vimeoinspiration · 12,418#32
@design_forum_russia · 11,622#33
@behancedsgn · 24,915#34
@lgvdsgner · 25,388#35
@HoudiniSoft · 7,032#36
@fontsch · 67,801#37
@vladsolovjov · 4,844#38
@poly3ds · 35,566#39
@b_and_a_design · 12,956#40
@designhunters · 80,030#41
@newfonts · 17,401#42
@psd_eu · 26,586#43
@figmaweb · 40,843#44
@cgnews · 14,613#45
@wtfont · 129,729#46
@uiwebdesignbest · 11,162#47
@thedesigner · 29,931#48
@design_translator · 20,919#49
@logovodsgner · 13,685#50
@fourdesign · 34,458#51
@design_hell · 30,078#52
@mr_mad_rabbit · 17,324#53
@three_club · 15,282#54
@Illustrationlessons · 47,532#55
@ikapustin_c4d · 4,964#56
@mokaposhnaya · 62,191#57
@Design_ZIP · 21,926#58
@magazine_design · 24,356#59
@uiux_design · 21,259#60
@threedforyouu · 9,499#61
@blender_tricks · 26,564#62
@dsgnworkers · 16,896#63
@bdsr_refs · 4,188#64
@figma60sec · 25,315#65
@ShockDesign · 5,787#66
@uxlive · 35,985#67
@secretd · 22,350#68
@freepikdsgn · 12,437#69
@geometrynodes · 16,012#70
@figmafordsgn · 7,900#71
@pixel_map · 3,883#72
@FacePalmDesign · 4,524#73
@design_mind · 14,626#74
@designsniper · 28,081#75
@baunsagency · 4,010#76
@figmaitochka · 11,434#77
@secondpilots_cg · 33,290#78
@educ3ds · 7,503#79
@designquestions · 4,992#80
@awdee · 33,522#81
@package_design · 23,586#82
@UEsoft · 11,388#83
@intelligentdsgners · 25,302#84
@polymodel · 10,785#85
@trolluz · 78,754#86
@retra · 165,571#87
@figmadesign · 105,902#88
@shrift_free · 57,737#89
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 23 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@vidguru · 28,219
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 9 September 2026
@illustrt · 35,592
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 2 September 2026
@photoshop_guru · 43,568
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 28 August 2026
@motionhunter · 28,021
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
@photoshopforyou · 65,163
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 21 August 2026
@adver_best · 21,359
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 24 September 2026
@motion_club · 22,298
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 21 September 2026
@photoshop_hack · 59,043
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 22 August 2026
@a_study · 47,250
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@graphic_and_design · 23,235
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 September 2026
@videosmile_ru · 27,021
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 September 2026
@premiere_pro · 64,028
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 21 August 2026
@design_telega · 79,070
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 18 August 2026
@behancedsgn · 24,915
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 15 September 2026
@dsgn_box · 45,822
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 27 August 2026
@lgvdsgner · 25,388
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 14 September 2026
@Blend3d · 29,879
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 8 September 2026
@design_hell · 30,078
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 7 September 2026
@visualmove · 30,306
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 7 September 2026
@psd_eu · 26,586
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 12 September 2026
@Illustrationlessons · 47,532
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 26 August 2026
@design_awards · 21,910
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 22 September 2026
@behancerdsgn · 41,330
Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 29 August 2026
@magazine_design · 24,356
Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 16 September 2026
This channel appears in 35 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Creative Motion” (@creativemotion), 21,556 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/creativemotion.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.