Channel
@intelligentdsgners
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
25,826subscribers
-97 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001100183930 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @intelligentdsgners |
| Description | О дизайне, типографике и UI/UX. По поводу рекламы @design_manager_bot Мы в реестре: https://vk.cc/cGa5Co |
| Created | 2 March 2017 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/intelligentdsgners |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 25,826 | -29 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 03:25 | 25,855 | -12 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 00:16 | 25,867 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:51 | 25,873 | -11 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:56 | 25,884 | -16 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:30 | 25,900 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:15 | 25,906 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 00:57 | 25,914 | -9 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 02:02 | 25,923 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 25,923 | first reading |
69 posts held, back to 2 March 2017 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 9 of 68 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 69 (2 March 2017 – 14 August 2026) |
| Views total | 13,861 |
| Reactions total | 12 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 03:59 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 8 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 10 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 69 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 12reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 69 most recent posts we hold, published 2 March 2017 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Продвижение: как собрать лайки и создать живое комьюнити В современном digital-мире просто выгрузить проект — уже мало. Даже самая стильная работа может остаться незамеченной, если вы не вкладываете усилия в продвижение и построение комьюнити. Сила дизайнерского Telegram или Instagram — в сторителлинге. За каждой работой есть своя история: покажите процесс создания, расскажите, почему выбрали именно эту типографику, …
Как разорвать круг "много работы — мало денег" Почти все дизайнеры рано или поздно сталкиваются с тем, что зарабатывают мало, несмотря на большой поток задач. Причём даже при выросших скиллах часто стесняются повышать ставки или аргументировать свою стоимость — боясь “потерять клиента”. На самом деле, если ваша работа качественная, ценность понятна — всегда найдутся те, кто готов платить больше. Первый шаг — поверьте…
Где искать клиентов дизайнеру и что на самом деле работает? Самая частая тревога начинающего (и не только) дизайнера — где взять следующий заказ и как не сидеть без работы? Биржи перегружены, конкуренция бешеная, ценник падает до уровня “500р за логотип”. Но есть инструменты, которые работают лучше и дают не только заказы, но и перспективу. Очень часто качественные заказы приходят не из “бирж”, а из реального окружен…
Как выделиться в мире, где дизайнеров — тысячи? Рынок переполнен: каждый второй в ленте рисует логотипы, делает лендинги, оформляет презентации. Новый дизайнер появляется каждую минуту — фриланс становится массовым. Кажется, быть замеченным — невозможно. Но, вопреки мифу, в этом есть шанс — если грамотно выстраивать свой путь. Первое: перестаньте бояться выделяться. Найдите в себе смелость показать эксперименты. Не т…
Как победить выгорание и перестать тонуть в рутине Выгорание — бич современных диджитал-дизайнеров. Когда ты день за днём обрабатываешь бесконечные правки, “попробуй красный”, “последняя версия-25”, “срочно до завтра”, любая инициатива гаснет, и даже самые красивые макеты перестают радовать. Часто этому способствуют монотонные, неживые задачи, отсутствие в них вызова и предсказуемость фидбека — иногда кажется, что ты…
Зачем российскому дизайнеру «китайская Беха»? Узнай, как важно количество подписчиков для твоего бренда. Число подписчиков – залог успеха или просто цифры? Поговорим о цифрах и их значимости в социальных сетях Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Какая форма у звука Исследования показывают, что связь между звуком и формой глубже, чем кажется. Рано развивающееся соответствие звуков и визуальных/тактильных качеств может быть универсальным Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Размытый градиент в Фигма ⚪️ #figma Сделаете быстрее, чем закипит чайник! : tanya_diz_one Дерзайте 🦖
ТОП-3 сайта с качественными иллюстрациями: 1. Sapiens – крутой сайт, где можно сделать картиинку под себя, поменять цвет одежды, пол, позу. 2. Undraw – сервис с иллюстрациями, где также можно менять цвета на любой понравившийся. 3. Delesign – сайт не только с иллюстрациями, но и иконками с возможностью настроить цвета. : @olesya_kipunova
Как быстро вы поймете, что без дизайн-поддержки брендинг умер? Статья о том, как быстро меняются тренды в дизайне. После проделанной работы над брендингом может оказаться, что ваш дизайн устарел за невероятно короткий промежуток времени Читать на дизайнерс | #статья
Плагин для создания изометрических иллюстраций 💎 #figma Fast Isometric – лучший помощник в этом. Главное – создать фигуру, щапустить плагин и ты в шоколаде. Установить плагин : @Kris_Anfalova
Если бы заказчики ко всем относились так же, как и к фрилансерам 😁 #memes
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 69 posts we hold for @intelligentdsgners. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 636,678 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@intelligentdsgners named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Intelligent Design” (@intelligentdsgners), 25,826 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/intelligentdsgners.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.