Channel
@labmish
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,327subscribers
-12 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001137554521 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @labmish |
| Description | Сотрудничество: @mishaisnohero По вакансиям: @a_garifyanova Кейсы: https://mish.design/?utm_source=tg&utm_medium=social Наш чат: https://t.me/+mtnG2ExEHg42OTAy |
| Created | 19 May 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/labmish |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:41 | 5,327 | -11 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:30 | 5,338 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:46 | 5,339 | first reading |
7 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 7 (29 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,656 |
| Reactions total | 109 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:27 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
109 reactions across 7 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5217878471383983120 | 42 | 38.5% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 30.3% | |
| ❤ | 16 | 14.7% | |
| 🦄 | 8 | 7.34% | |
| custom 5460935996424094836 | 7 | 6.42% | |
| 🤣 | 3 | 2.75% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 7 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 109reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 7 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
У нас вторник — маленькая пятница Поэтому показываем вам пивное тестовое, в котором был сделан бренд с неймингом и заанимированной концепцией лендоса. Mish ❤️
🔥12custom 52178784713839831205❤3custom 54609359964240948361
Как вайбкодинг бережёт бюджет 🤑 На вайбкодинг принято ворчать и относиться к нему скептически. Мы, в общем, тоже нет-нет, да и да. Но мы любим проверять всё сами. И обнаружили, что у него есть вполне достойное применение. Например, он приходит на помощь, когда хочется протестировать какую-то идею, но отдавать её в полноценную разработку пока не кажется целесообразным. В карточках рассказываем, как работает этот по…
custom 52178784713839831205custom 54609359964240948362🔥1
Астрология на базе ИИ ⭐️ Кейс «Нейроастро» — это история про то, как мы скрестили эзотерику с нейросетями и завернули всё в современный технологичный UI. Полный кейс с визуалами и деталями разработки — на сайте. Mish ❤️
🦄5🔥3custom 52178784713839831202🤣1
Божественная комедия согласований 🎭 Как гарантированно отправить брендинг на девятый круг ада согласований? Рецепт простой: соберите команду, напишите ТЗ, выберите подрядчика, утвердите концепт и только на финальном этапе покажите всё человеку, который принимает решения. Поздравляем, вы в тупике, а бюджет можно тратить заново. По этой схеме регулярно сыпятся сотни проектов. В карточках разбираем, почему этот порочн…
custom 52178784713839831208🔥4❤3🤣2
Самый кайф этого проекта — в «до/после» 🤩 Одна из задач, которую мы решали — дать клиенту суперсилу коммуникационного дизайна, чтобы продажа велась не только на маркетплейсах, но и на их сайте. И нам удалось это сделать, сайт теперь выглядит и рассказывает про их продукцию максимально сочно и атмосферно, чего в рамках карточки товара сделать тяжело. Mish ❤️
🔥5custom 52178784713839831204❤3🦄2custom 54609359964240948362
Парк юрского периода в электронной коммерции 🦕 Panteric — лидер рынка экзотических животных в России. Но их прежний сайт не справлялся с масштабом бизнеса: магазин, зоо-отель, ветеринарка и курсы жили своей жизнью, а онлайн-каталог существовал отдельно от складов и касс в реальных магазинах. Мы помогли замкнуть оффлайн и онлайн в единую экосистему, навели порядок в процессах и продумали визуальный стиль, отражающий…
custom 52178784713839831209❤7🔥4🦄1
Всё и сразу Ответы в чате, правки в доке, ход противника в игре — всё это клиенты хотят видеть сразу, в момент, когда это произошло. А обновлять ради этого страницу больше не хотят. И если интерфейс грамотно сделан, то им и не придется — он обновит всё сам. За таким интерфейсом можете прийти к нам — всё сделаем 🤝 В карточках рассказываем о том, почему ручная перезагрузка всех бесит, и как real-time механики берегу…
custom 52178784713839831209🔥4custom 54609359964240948362
Showing the 7 most recent of 7 posts we hold for @labmish. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 71,915 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 10 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Mish | Дизайн, исследования и разработка” (@labmish), 5,327 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/labmish.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.