Channel
@dsgnaichannel
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
10,037subscribers
-31 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001328349057 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @dsgnaichannel |
| Created | 3 August 2020 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/dsgnaichannel |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Aug 2026, 19:43 | 10,037 | -6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 06:06 | 10,043 | -5 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 10,048 | -3 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:05 | 10,051 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 10,052 | -4 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 10,056 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 10,059 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:23 | 10,063 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 10,067 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:00 | 10,068 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 18:53 | 10,068 | first reading |
62 posts held, back to 3 August 2020 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 2 of 61 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 62 (3 August 2020 – 15 August 2026) |
| Views total | 3,100 |
| Reactions total | 3 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Aug 2026, 19:30 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 38 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3 reactions across 2 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 2 | 66.7% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2020 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
| erid | Posts | First seen | Last seen |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2VtzqvFhZrB | 1 | 7 August 2026 | 7 August 2026 |
A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.
Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2020 to 15 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Собираем 3D-анимацию с частицами в Claude без знания кода Узнай, как создать 3D-графику из Figma и интегрировать её в Webflow с помощью кастомного кода. Андрей из Relate делится секретами в новой статье! Читать на дизайнерс | #урок
Почему клиенту часто “нормально”, а тебе хочется переделать всё Одна из самых сложных вещей в моушен-дизайне — это момент, когда клиент говорит “всё хорошо”, а ты сам видишь, что работа сырая. Тайминг не дотянут, переходы местами случайные, движение где-то слишком резкое, где-то пустое. Вроде бы проект можно сдавать, но внутри есть ощущение, что он не отражает твой уровень. Эта боль знакома почти каждому дизайнеру: к…
Почему моушен-дизайнеру важно уметь не только анимировать, но и показывать свою работу Очень многие сильные моушен-дизайнеры недополучают внимание не потому, что плохо делают, а потому что плохо показывают результат. Это особенно заметно в портфолио и соцсетях: хорошая анимация может пройти мимо, если она выложена без контекста, без нормальной обложки, без понимания, что именно в ней стоит заметить. А ведь в моушене …
Почему в моушене всё ломается, если не думать о ритме Одна из самых недооценённых тем в моушен-дизайне — это ритм. Многие сосредотачиваются на самих объектах, на графике, на красивых переходах, но забывают, что именно ритм держит ролик как единое целое. Из-за этого даже хорошая по стилю работа может смотреться утомительно, рвано или просто странно. Зритель не всегда может объяснить, что именно не так, но чувствует: р…
Почему анимация часто выглядит дёшево, даже если всё “технически правильно” Многие дизайнеры сталкиваются с одной и той же болью: вроде бы всё сделано аккуратно, объекты двигаются, переходы есть, музыка подобрана, но ролик всё равно ощущается “дешёвым”. И это особенно обидно, потому что ошибка не всегда очевидна. Кажется, что проблема в недостатке навыка, в слабом софте или в том, что “нужно просто больше практики”. …
Почему начинающие в моушене слишком рано бегут в эффекты Одна из самых частых ловушек в моушен-дизайне — желание как можно быстрее сделать “круто”. Добавить побольше переходов, динамики, свечения, сложных движений, искажений, 3D-ощущения. Кажется, что именно это и делает работу сильной. Но на практике часто выходит наоборот: ролик становится шумным, анимация перегруженной, а смысл теряется уже на первых секундах. И э…
Воскресный таймлайн Оцениваем отличный саунд-дизайн😮
Эффект растягивания текста в Premiere Pro Эффект отскока текста В этом видео я покажу вам, как создать эффект растягивания текста в Premiere Pro. Project Font Смотреть с субтитрами #уроки
Простые вирусные подписи для социальных сетей Узнайте, как создавать привлекательные подписи в Premiere Pro, вдохновленные Tom Noske! Я проведу вас через каждый шаг, от настройки текста до анимации, чтобы вы могли выделить свои подписи так же, как профессионалы. Смотреть с субтитрами #уроки
Таймлайн отличного Travel-видео Смотрим и вдохновляемся🤩
Inspo Compilation: Дайджест креативных сайтов | Июль 2026 Девять крутых веб-сайтов за июль - оцените лучшие работы с инновационным дизайном и функциональностью от SALT AND PEPPER Читать на дизайнерс | #дайджест
3 совета по инструменту «Pen» для Premiere Pro Смотреть с субтитрами #уроки
Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @dsgnaichannel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@dsgnaichannel named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Моушен-джедаи 🎬” (@dsgnaichannel), 10,037 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/dsgnaichannel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.