International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 83% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far above this size band
21,000 average views per post against 6,897 subscribers — an engagement rate of 304.2%. Across the 1,118 registered channels in the same cohort — 3,470–9,998 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 12.8% and 36.4%, with a median of 22.1%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (6 October 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Posts measured
11 of 11 published in the window (0 exact, 11 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
230,820
Mature posts only
304.2% over 11 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 5 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +700. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,022–7,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
7 Nov 2026, 23:21
6,888
-9
4 Nov 2026, 22:39
6,897
+2
2 Nov 2026, 08:59
6,895
+84
30 Oct 2026, 15:26
6,811
-10
27 Oct 2026, 13:38
6,821
-17
24 Oct 2026, 11:17
6,838
+3
21 Oct 2026, 16:37
6,835
-6
18 Oct 2026, 08:46
6,841
+525
15 Oct 2026, 08:19
6,316
-3
12 Oct 2026, 16:10
6,319
-11
5 Oct 2026, 15:20
6,330
+194
27 Sept 2026, 22:00
6,136
-37
15 Sept 2026, 20:39
6,173
-8
12 Sept 2026, 00:39
6,181
-5
7 Sept 2026, 08:20
6,186
-13
2 Sept 2026, 21:54
6,199
-11
30 Aug 2026, 19:14
6,210
+54
28 Aug 2026, 05:38
6,156
-13
25 Aug 2026, 10:44
6,169
+22
22 Aug 2026, 16:06
6,147
first reading
Engagement
28 posts held, back to 20 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
252.0%
avg views ÷ 6,888 subscribers
Avg views / post
17,400
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.482%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 28 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 November 2026
Posts held
28 (20 July 2026 – 8 November 2026)
Views total
242,990
Reactions total
1,170
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
10 Nov 2026, 16:46 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈2,780
Videos
≈415
Links
≈1,710
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
3m 07s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,496 reactions across 28 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
741
29.7%
👍
452
18.1%
😢
348
13.9%
🔥
342
13.7%
🤬
117
4.69%
🙏
114
4.57%
😭
85
3.41%
🤯
80
3.21%
🤔
67
2.68%
custom 5231275767165376970
50
2.00%
custom 5429243089149523944
37
1.48%
🫡
31
1.24%
😱
13
0.521%
🎉
11
0.441%
👀
8
0.321%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,496 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 20 July 2026 to 8 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇹🇼✈️ Тайвань отримав другу партію винищувачів F-16 Block 70
Сьогодні на авіабазу «Чжихан» у повіті Тайдун на сході острова прибули три нові винищувачі F-16 Block 70 для Повітряних сил Китайської Республіки, замовлені у 2019 році.
Перші два літаки прибули в жовтні, тож загалом Тайвань отримав п’ять із 66 замовлених винищувачів. Процес їхнього виробництва та постачання вже стабілізувався.
AviVector
🇮🇳 Індійський Іл-76МД здійснив найвисокогірнішу посадку в історії літака
Військово-транспортний літак Іл-76МД Повітряних сил Індії здійснив посадку на авіабазі «Ньома» в Ладакху на висоті 4154 м, встановивши світовий рекорд для цього типу літаків.
Авіабаза розташована поблизу лінії фактичного контролю з Китаєм і має злітно-посадкову смугу завдовжки 3 км. Її модернізацію розпочали у 2021 році після загострення на ко…
🇫🇷🇮🇹 Французькі та італійські винищувачі супроводжували літаки після погроз вибуху
Сьогодні погрози про вибухівку отримали щонайменше 19 рейсів у Європі. Літаки Aer Lingus і Finnair, що прямували до Рима, супроводжували французькі та італійські винищувачі.
Літак Aer Lingus здійснив посадку на 105-й авіабазі у Франції, а борти Wizz Air і Ryanair приземлилися у Відні та Пловдиві. Під час перевірок вибухових пристроїв…
🇰🇿🇪🇸 Казахстан отримав другий військово-транспортний літак Airbus A400M Atlas
Учора Сили повітряної оборони Казахстану отримали другий військово-транспортний літак Airbus A400M Atlas, який прибув до Алмати із заводу Airbus у Іспанії.
Літак став другим і останнім A400M за контрактом, укладеним Казахстаном у 2021 році. Перший борт урочисто передали країні у грудні 2024 року.
AviVector
🇺🇸 У США зазнав катастрофи літак Learjet 60 з дев'ятьма людьми на борту
Учора у Флориді поблизу аеропорту Палм-Біч зазнав катастрофи літак Learjet 60, що виконував рейс з Остіна на Багамські острови. Загинули всі 9 людей на борту.
За попередніми даними FAA, літак приблизно за хвилину знизився з 10,7 до 2,7 км. Перед цим екіпаж повідомив про обмерзання й турбулентність, а згодом подав сигнал лиха.
AviVector
🇺🇸✈️ Винищувачі F-16 вперше за десятиліття несли чергування на Алеутських островах
З 18 по 26 жовтня винищувачі F-16 Повітряних сил США несли бойове чергування на авіабазі «Ерексон» на острові Шем'я, розташованому за близько 800 км від Камчатки.
Регулярна присутність винищувачів на острові припинилася на початку 1990-х. Також до операції з інших баз залучили F-35A, канадські CF-18, літак ДРЛВ E-3 Sentry і літаки-за…
Наслідки ураження аеродрому «Мариновка» у Волгоградській області Військово-морськими силами України 29 жовтня. Знищено два винищувачі-бомбардувальники Су-34.
AviVector
🇮🇹🇧🇦 У Боснії і Герцеговині зазнав катастрофи італійський гелікоптер Chinook
Сьогодні на північному сході Боснії і Герцеговини зазнав катастрофи гелікоптер ICH-47F Chinook італійського контингенту місії ЄС EUFOR Althea.
За даними боснійських ЗМІ, внаслідок катастрофи загинули четверо військовослужбовців Сухопутних військ Італії, ще 11 дістали поранення.
AviVector
🇵🇱🇺🇦 Польща передасть Україні ще два винищувачі МіГ-29
Найближчим часом Польща передасть Україні два винищувачі МіГ-29, один з яких має вироблений льотний ресурс і, ймовірно, піде на запчастини, а другий придатний до польотів.
Літаки увійдуть до пакета допомоги на суму близько 50 млн євро, який також включає артбоєприпаси, снаряди до гармат F-16 і ПЗРК Piorun.
AviVector
🇧🇪✈️ Повітряні сили Бельгії отримали 16-й винищувач F-35A
26 жовтня на авіабазу «Флоренн» прибув винищувач F-35A з бортовим номером FL014, який затримався в США для завершення процедур сертифікації льотної придатності.
Ще вісім машин залишаються на авіабазі «Люк» у США, звідки нещодавно повернулися перші бельгійські пілоти, які пройшли кваліфікацію на F-35 без досвіду на F-16.
AviVector
🇲🇾🇰🇷 Малайзія отримає перші південнокорейські легкі бойові літаки FA-50M Block 20
30 жовтня Королівські повітряні сили Малайзії отримають перші два південнокорейські легкі бойові літаки FA-50M Block 20, розроблені компанією KAI.
Контракт, укладений у травні 2023 року на суму 920 млн доларів, передбачає постачання 18 літаків, решту з яких планують передати до 2028 року.
AviVector
🔥34👍16👀2🤬1
Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @avivector. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 52 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
✈️Стратегічна авіація @StrategicaviationT · 132,792 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 15 August 2026
Strategic Control @strategicontrol · 27,150 Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 13 September 2026
Розвідка України @Ukrainian_Intelligence · 66,491 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 21 August 2026
Ринда моніторить @kudy_letyt · 158,861 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 13 August 2026
КОРАБЕЛИ @korabely_media · 156,233 Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Каменський Пацюк 🇺🇦🫡 @stone_rat · 34,275 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 14 September 2026
Тривога Старкон !!!! @grup223m · 35,614 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 September 2026
#SK# говорить🇺🇦 @SK_DM_SK · 191,986 Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 14 August 2026
monitoring захід @monitoring_zaxid · 161,274 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 23 August 2026
Моніторинг Київ | Аналітика @kyiv_m0nitoring · 112,188 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
Повітряний простір України 🇺🇦 @monikppy · 229,138 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
monitorwar @monitoringwar · 26,432 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Північний Сич 🦉 @Northern_Sich_ukr · 109,159 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 14 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 13 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
AviVector(uk.wikipedia.org) “…проєкту був опублікований 22 липня 2024 року{{Cite web |url=https://t.me/avivector/351 |title=AviVector |website=Telegram |access-date=2025-08-24}}…” read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“AviVector” (@avivector), 6,888 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/avivector.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.