🇺🇸|| La FAA cancela la orden de inmovilización de aeronaves a nivel nacional. @worldmilitares
👍8❤3

Channel
@worldmilitares
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
7,694subscribers
+140 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001988831992 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @worldmilitares |
| Description | Canal de Información Militar, en donde intentamos transmitir información de CALIDAD para todos nuestros seguidores. TODAS NUESTRAS REDES SOCIALES https://linktr.ee/world.militares |
| Created | Between 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 25 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/worldmilitares |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 1 other registered channel. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @worldmilitares/43862 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/431687 Aug 2026, 15:04 UTC | 1.00 | 2 minutes |
| @worldmilitares/44548 · this entry12 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/4446512 Nov 2026, 18:09 UTC | 0.99 | under a minute |
| @worldmilitares/44468 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/441433 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC | 0.99 | under a minute |
| @worldmilitares/44467 · this entry3 Nov 2026, 15:17 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/441423 Nov 2026, 15:18 UTC | 0.99 | under a minute |
| @worldmilitares/44538 · this entry10 Nov 2026, 23:44 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/4442710 Nov 2026, 23:47 UTC | 0.98 | 2 minutes |
| @worldmilitares/43855 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 20:54 UTC | @blackearhtgeo/431666 Aug 2026, 20:55 UTC | 0.98 | under a minute |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @blackearhtgeo | 8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 2 minutes | this entry (8–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. None of the 0 matches recorded here fall after that date, so for this entry we cannot say whether any of them carried a credit. The duplication is measured; the absence of attribution is not.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 163 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the key clone_source, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Nov 2026, 23:47 | 7,694 | -7 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 18:44 | 7,701 | +5 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 17:16 | 7,696 | +10 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 16:36 | 7,686 | +75 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 14:45 | 7,611 | +9 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 06:56 | 7,602 | -10 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 15:34 | 7,612 | -1 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 7,613 | +58 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 04:55 | 7,555 | -15 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 23:07 | 7,570 | -20 |
| 8 Oct 2026, 14:17 | 7,590 | -29 |
| 2 Oct 2026, 05:20 | 7,619 | +54 |
| 16 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 7,565 | -14 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 09:56 | 7,579 | -3 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 21:57 | 7,582 | +18 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 7,564 | -14 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 7,578 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 04:23 | 7,580 | -19 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 00:15 | 7,599 | +4 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:13 | 7,595 | first reading |
172 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 40 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 172 (3 August 2026 – 14 November 2026) |
| Views total | 66,312 |
| Reactions total | 1,536 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 14 Nov 2026, 15:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
3,101 reactions across 172 posts, in 20 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,008 | 32.5% | |
| 🤡 | 497 | 16.0% | |
| 🔥 | 340 | 11.0% | |
| 👍 | 330 | 10.6% | |
| 🤬 | 193 | 6.22% | |
| 🤣 | 154 | 4.97% | |
| 😱 | 130 | 4.19% | |
| 😁 | 95 | 3.06% | |
| 🤔 | 83 | 2.68% | |
| 👀 | 68 | 2.19% | |
| 😢 | 54 | 1.74% | |
| 👎 | 49 | 1.58% | |
| 🎉 | 27 | 0.871% | |
| 🤮 | 20 | 0.645% | |
| 👏 | 19 | 0.613% | |
| 🗿 | 10 | 0.322% | |
| 🫡 | 9 | 0.29% | |
| 🥰 | 7 | 0.226% | |
| 🕊 | 5 | 0.161% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 0.097% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 172 of the 172 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,101 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 172 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 6 of 96 posts held from the last 30 days (6.25%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🇺🇸|| La FAA cancela la orden de inmovilización de aeronaves a nivel nacional. @worldmilitares
👍8❤3
🇺🇸|| Las cancelaciones de vuelos en todo Estados Unidos ya superan las 5.000 y siguen aumentando rápidamente. @worldmilitares
😱9❤1👀1
🇺🇸|| Trump afirma que la paralización de los vuelos a nivel nacional no parece estar relacionada con un ciberataque ni con la inteligencia artificial, según declaró en una entrevista con Fox News. @worldmilitares
👍4🤔2
🇺🇸|| Según informa FlightRadar24, “cada vez se permite la salida de más vuelos desde aeropuertos del noreste de Estados Unidos, con rumbo al este a través del Atlántico.” @worldmilitares
❤8👍2
🇺🇸|| La FAA ha comunicado a las aerolíneas que la interrupción a nivel nacional fue causada por un problema en los enrutadores de red, según indica a la CNN una fuente del sector aéreo. @worldmilitares
👍5🤔1
🇺🇸🇪🇺🇲🇽|| Los vuelos con origen en Europa y México hacia Estados Unidos también han sido suspendidos a petición de la FAA. @worldmilitares
😱7👍2
🇺🇸|| La FAA “todavía no sabe qué está pasando” y la interrupción “está afectando a distintas instalaciones de diferentes maneras”, comenta a la CNN una fuente de una aerolínea. @worldmilitares
👀6😱1
🇺🇸|| En la evaluación preliminar de la suspensión de vuelos a nivel nacional no se han detectado indicios de intenciones maliciosas, informaron funcionarios a CBS News. El problema está relacionado con las frecuencias de radio y la forma en que los pilotos se comunican entre sí. @worldmilitares
👍5
🇺🇸|| Las autoridades están investigando si una actualización de software interrumpió involuntariamente las comunicaciones de la FAA, lo que provocó una suspensión de los vuelos a nivel nacional. - Bloomberg. @worldmilitares
👍5❤1
🇺🇸|| El secretario de Transporte de Estados Unidos señala un “problema de comunicación” como causa de la suspensión del tráfico aéreo a nivel nacional @worldmilitares
👍9🤡4❤1
🇺🇸|| Según informa el monitor TheIntelFrog, la última vez que se produjo una suspensión de vuelos a escala nacional fue en enero de 2023, cuando el sistema NOTAM de la FAA sufrió un fallo. @worldmilitares
👍8❤1
🇺🇸|| La FAA ha ordenado una “paralización total de vuelos” en todos los aeropuertos de Estados Unidos a nivel nacional hasta nuevo aviso, citando “circunstancias extraordinarias”. @worldmilitares
👀11❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 172 posts we hold for @worldmilitares. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@worldmilitares named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“world.militares” (@worldmilitares), 7,694 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/worldmilitares.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.