Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Житомир|Blacklist

@blacklist_public

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

39,740subscribers

+1,188 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001520360332
TypeChannel
Username@blacklist_public
DescriptionНадіслати відео, фото новину можна на бота @Blacklist_publicbot Не ЗМІ. Фан сторінка.
Created14 November 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/blacklist_public

Growth

38,55239,74039,1467 August 2026 — 38,552 subscribers8 August 2026 — 38,560 subscribers9 August 2026 — 38,999 subscribers9 August 2026 — 39,236 subscribers10 August 2026 — 39,256 subscribers11 August 2026 — 39,381 subscribers12 August 2026 — 39,489 subscribers14 August 2026 — 39,740 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 7 days, net +1,188. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 38,374–39,918 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 08:2639,740+251
12 Aug 2026, 22:1439,489+108
11 Aug 2026, 20:5239,381+125
10 Aug 2026, 20:1739,256+20
9 Aug 2026, 22:2139,236+237
9 Aug 2026, 01:4238,999+439
8 Aug 2026, 00:4538,560+8
7 Aug 2026, 14:1538,552first reading

Engagement

196 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.7%
avg views ÷ 39,740 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,600
196 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.884%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
196
of 196 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 195 of 196 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held196 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total2,081,960
Reactions total18,367
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 14:18 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
10,800
Videos
5,250
Links
1,780

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
3m 42s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

18,367 reactions across 195 posts, in 42 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏6,63036.1%
🤬3,46118.8%
2,53613.8%
😢1,1746.39%
😁9235.03%
💯6133.34%
🤣5362.92%
😭3822.08%
👍3161.72%
😱2751.50%
🥰2441.33%
💊1961.07%
💘1600.871%
👀1480.806%
🔥1300.708%
🤯1280.697%
😍730.397%
🗿590.321%
🤔590.321%
🙈510.278%
22 further kinds2731.49%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 195 of the 196 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,367reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 196 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 196 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @blacklist_public. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 196 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 12:12 UTC≈4,230 views85 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

АВТОДОР, МОЖЕ ВЖЕ НАМАЛЮЄТЕ РОЗМІТКУ НА ПРОСПЕКТІ? 🤬 Можливо, нарешті певні служби звернуть увагу на цю проблему. Ми щодня їздимо цією вулицею постійно стикаємося з небезпечними ситуаціями. Розмітки немає — кожен їде, як хоче. Хтось перебудовується без поворотника, хтось ріже смуги, хтось просто не розуміє, де має їхати. Автодор, це взагалі нормально? Чи потрібно чекати ДТП, щоб хтось нарешті звернув увагу? І окр

55👍26💯2🤣2

15 Aug 2026, 10:30 UTC≈6,670 views151 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#нампишуть Заходжу я в автобус оплачую проїзд, оплата не проходить, не поняла, водій змушує ще раз оплатити і потім ще раз, це моя вина що йому показує начебто не пройшла оплата, а в мене списання є, тобто оплата пройшла. Як вам по місту 72 грн, я так розумію вони не повернуть ці гроші ?

🤬139🤣8👏21😱1

15 Aug 2026, 08:50 UTC≈8,520 views56 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Якась біда з оплатами в магазинах В атб нормально розрахувалась В інших магазинах проплата не проходить ні з моно банку ні з авалю Майте на увазі, беріть готівку з собою

39🙉14🎄2🤣1

15 Aug 2026, 08:02 UTC≈8,530 views14 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

ШУКАЄМО ОФІЦІАНТА 💜 Якщо ти сміливий, комунікабельний і готовий працювати в крутій команді — приєднуйся до PARADOX! Ми чекаємо саме на тебе 👀 📲 +380961523140 Instagram: paradox.lounge.zt

13💊1

15 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC≈8,530 views146 reactions2 Starsread 15 August 2026
Photo

#нампишуть Це Ілля пророк нассяв? Тоді до Іллі питання - чого так багато і чого мені у ванну? До Житомирводоканал теж два питання: це нам за підвищення плати в 2,2 рази і за те що ми не молимось?

62😁38🤬24💯13👍5💊4

15 Aug 2026, 06:18 UTC≈9,730 views118 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Сервіс за 24 грн 🫡

😁75🤬30🤯74💘1😍1

15 Aug 2026, 05:41 UTC≈10,200 views104 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Якість покриття нового асфальту на Київській …

🤬78🤣193😍3🤩1

14 Aug 2026, 19:08 UTC≈13,900 views272 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026

#нампишуть Хочу поділитись відгуком про Зелену Палатку. Палатка, що продає канцелярію , товари до школи ті іграшки. Прийшовши в палатку ви зможете зайти лише з дитиною на руках. З дитячими візками вхід заборонено. Тобто візок ви лишаєте на вулиці, на вході . Відповідальності за речі вони не несуть. І людина з обмеженими можливостями туди також не зайде. Зелена Палатка вже давно своє віджила. Хіба на тому місці не мо

💯210🔥25🙈12🤣9👍7💊63

14 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC≈13,500 views66 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Сьогодні буде гарний захід сонця 🥰

57💊4🙈4😍1

14 Aug 2026, 13:31 UTC≈14,400 views61 reactions1 Starread 15 August 2026
Photo

#нампишуть Прошу максимальної допомоги!!! В цей час коли місто Житомир розвивається у футбольному плані і всі намагаються залучити дітей до заняття цим видом спорту, але на жаль на футбольному полі Ліцею #19 в м. Житомирі панує занедбаність. Зелені металеві огорожі вкриті іржею, сітка порвана й провисає в багатьох місцях. Штучне покриття місцями зношене, а навколо — суха трава та зарості. На полі відсутні одні ворот

45🗿15💋1

14 Aug 2026, 13:24 UTC≈12,500 views30 reactionsread 15 August 2026

Коростень тривога із-за бпла в ЧЗВ

🤬25🙏4💋1

14 Aug 2026, 09:49 UTC≈13,400 views312 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Video

Хто видав права собаці? 🥰

🥰202😁42😍3821💘6💊2🔥1

Showing the 12 most recent of 196 posts we hold for @blacklist_public. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 714,461 of 1,478,351entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новини Житомира | pzhytomyr
@zhytomyr · 112,151
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 14 August 2026
Труха⚡️Житомир
@truexazhitomir · 138,919
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Житомир|Blacklist” (@blacklist_public), 39,740 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/blacklist_public.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.