Channel
@informationliberation
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
5,294subscribers
+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001209887535 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @informationliberation |
| Created | 4 December 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/informationliberation |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 08:03 | 5,294 | +9 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 5,285 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 08:11 | 5,288 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:00 | 5,290 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 5,290 | first reading |
33 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 33 (28 July 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 108,201 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 04:31 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 22 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Bill O'Reilly urges Trump to commit war crimes in Iran, framing the bombing of Tehran's civilian infrastructure as a cheat code to victory. "We had enough with Japan, we had enough with Germany…we took care of that. And we're going to have to do the same thing with Iran!" (Keep in mind as you listen that Trump regularly calls O'Reilly for advice.)
"We lost the war!" John Podhoretz and the Commentary Mag crew lament that the Iran War they championed is a total disaster. "People say, 'Oh, the neocons got what they wanted!' No! None of us wanted this!" Abe Greenwald protests. Be careful what you wish for! 🤌
Brian Kilmeade says the US is never going to comply with Iran's new list of demands (withdraw from the region, pay them reparations for war damages, release frozen assets, lift all sanctions, etc.). "None of this stuff is going to happen!" he insists. Bookmark this for later, lmao.
Mark Levin kvetches up a storm over Trump wanting to make a deal with Iran. "It is apparent to me that we want a deal," Levin laments. "But the Israelis want to defeat the regime! They want to defeat the enemy, because they know that is the only way!" "We have sidelined, and through the press, have trash-talked our greatest ally—Israel," he whines. "[They're] not only [our greatest ally] in the region, but they're …
Lisa Boothe, in a rare moment of pushback, asks Amb. Mike Huckabee why America's efforts against Iran don't seem to be working. He insists the Iranian regime "is weaker than it has been in 47 years," but then notes how the range of their ballistic missiles is longer than ever. "Their missile capacity, unfortunately, has grown."
Mike Huckabee says war-weary Americans need to support the war because Iran plans to nuke us "the moment" they get a nuclear weapon. He also says they mustn't be allowed to drive up the price of oil and other goods by blocking the Hormuz Strait. (It's an affordability issue!)
Mark Levin throws a fit over Americans not wanting to fight Israel's wars, insisting that the "Greatest Generation" would be eager to fight Iran and wouldn't be complaining about higher prices. "I remember a time when America would say, 'Let's go! Let's destroy that country!'" He wonders if a draft would "work" today and insists that "the vast majority of us are utterly unaffected" by "what's going on in Iran."
Ben Shapiro proposes the US strike Iran's energy facilities and "walk away."
Bill O'Reilly to Ben Shapiro: "Researching you…there's almost a constant theme that you are a defender of Israel and Judaism. Would that be true?" Shapiro: "I mean, it's certainly true that I defend Israel… I would not say that that is my predominant characteristic…" (This is how he opened the interview, lmao)
Bari Weiss' "Free Press" has a podcast called "School of War" that's literally sponsored by the Dept of Defense's Maven Smart System ("powered by" Palantir). Their new episode features Ted Cruz lobbying for regime change in Iran and whining about Tucker Carlson/anti-Semitism.
Katie Pavlich evidently thinks it's a great idea that elderly Jewish women are getting armed and training with the Jewish gun group "Lox & Loaded" to fight Muslims they fear under Mamdani are going to come door to door to "take out" Jews and turn NYC into a Muslim caliphate.
🚨 Fox News just stealth-edited this report from Efrat Lachter (a former IDF spokeswoman) which claimed matter-of-factly that IRGC chief Ahmad Vahidi had "declared Wednesday" that Iran was "working on nuclear weapons." The report now says Vahidi "reportedly" said it and links to Channel 14 as the source. As YNet reported, the (almost certainly fake) quote first went viral after being shared by the Israeli propaganda…
Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @informationliberation. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 9,176 of 1,084,084entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Information Liberation” (@informationliberation), 5,294 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/informationliberation.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.