International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
37 measurements spanning 96 days, net +16,405. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 175–22,714 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 37
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 21:17
19,251
-274
9 Nov 2026, 07:38
19,525
-17
7 Nov 2026, 20:08
19,542
-412
6 Nov 2026, 17:09
19,954
-127
5 Nov 2026, 15:05
20,081
-22
4 Nov 2026, 16:25
20,103
-10
3 Nov 2026, 13:37
20,113
+54
2 Nov 2026, 11:40
20,059
+212
1 Nov 2026, 13:05
19,847
+64
31 Oct 2026, 16:04
19,783
+136
30 Oct 2026, 13:37
19,647
+27
29 Oct 2026, 11:59
19,620
-80
28 Oct 2026, 11:30
19,700
+4,065
27 Oct 2026, 07:55
15,635
+763
26 Oct 2026, 11:14
14,872
+2,035
25 Oct 2026, 11:27
12,837
+4,998
22 Oct 2026, 22:06
7,839
+1,769
19 Oct 2026, 23:49
6,070
+1,740
17 Oct 2026, 08:55
4,330
+1,003
14 Oct 2026, 13:07
3,327
first reading
Engagement
57 posts held, back to 8 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.8%
avg views ÷ 19,251 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,430
42 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
42
of 57 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
57 (8 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
144,200
Reactions total
1,153
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 04:21 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
145
Videos
60
Links
35
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
18m 13s
Average length
2m 01s
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
2,573 reactions across 57 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
730
28.4%
🔥
603
23.4%
👍
373
14.5%
👏
345
13.4%
🤬
316
12.3%
⚡
73
2.84%
🤯
65
2.53%
🥰
33
1.28%
👌
22
0.855%
😱
13
0.505%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 57 of the 57 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 57 most recent posts we hold, published 8 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 24 of 42 posts held from the last 30 days (57.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Mali: Another front in the West's campaign against Russia in Africa
Mali's President Assimi Goïta has awarded Russian General Andrey Averyanov the title of Commander of the National Order of Mali, recognising Russia's contribution to security and defence cooperation.
The award comes amid an escalating insurgency, with jihadist militants threatening key cities and the Malian army struggling to contain the offensive.…
🇮🇷❌🇺🇸🇴🇲 — Iran’s IRGC Navy says it struck a navigation system in the southern Strait of Hormuz used to support U.S. Navy-assisted maritime transit.
Footage reportedly shows smoke rising from an island in the area after the strike.
@LeonovZ
🇮🇷🇺🇸🇮🇱⚡️ — The IRGC’s continuing missile tests are sending a clear warning to the United States and Israel after their attempt to destroy Iran’s missile program largely failed.
Instead, Iran has returned with a significantly stronger missile program, raising new concerns for US and Israel.
@LeonovZ
🇺🇸🇶🇦🇮🇷⚡️ — Trump is expected to meet Qatar’s prime minister on Monday to discuss an Iranian proposal to reopen the Strait of Hormuz in exchange for the release of $8 billion in frozen funds, Israel Hayom reports.
@LeonovZ
🇮🇷🇺🇸⚛️⚡️ — Iranian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei said IAEA inspectors carried out checks at the Bushehr Nuclear Power Plant a few days ago.
Baghaei said Iran “has not ceased fulfilling its obligations” under IAEA rules, but renewed criticism of the agency for failing to take “a stance in the face of U.S. and Israeli attacks on Iran’s nuclear facilities.”
@LeonovZ
🇺🇸❌🇮🇷 — The United States has updated its security advisories across the Middle East, including Israel, Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar and Bahrain, warning of Iranian attempts to target senior American officials in the region, according to Ynet.
The advisories urge U.S. citizens to prepare for possible flight disruptions, airspace closures and a rapid escalation in hostilities.
@LeonovZ
🇺🇸🇮🇱❌🇮🇷 — Trump may choose a limited strike on Iran focused only on nuclear-related targets, including Pickaxe Mountain, rather than a wider attack that would also hit energy facilities, according to i24NEWS.
U.S. officials told i24NEWS that despite the Republican midterm losses, the option of an attack on Iran remains on the table.
🇺🇸🇮🇷⚡️ — NEW: The midterm elections have complicated Trump’s options as he weighs renewed strikes on Iran, The New York Times reports.
The report says Trump is considering whether to resume major combat operations after weeks of U.S. naval and air buildup, despite saying he would have done “nothing different” in the war. Vice President JD Vance wrote that “the reason we lost is the war,” arguing Republicans paid the…
🤬11❤3👍3🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 57 posts we hold for @LeonovZ. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 16 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Viktor Leonov” (@LeonovZ), 19,251 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/LeonovZ.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
