Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 42% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 43 days, net -458. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 47,899–48,495 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 19:57
47,968
-4
15 Sept 2026, 16:37
47,972
-12
14 Sept 2026, 03:16
47,984
+10
12 Sept 2026, 12:17
47,974
-25
10 Sept 2026, 12:21
47,999
+11
7 Sept 2026, 09:37
47,988
-16
4 Sept 2026, 12:19
48,004
-19
2 Sept 2026, 22:09
48,023
-13
1 Sept 2026, 21:04
48,036
-10
31 Aug 2026, 17:54
48,046
-11
30 Aug 2026, 18:47
48,057
-23
29 Aug 2026, 18:34
48,080
-14
27 Aug 2026, 14:47
48,094
-21
26 Aug 2026, 16:09
48,115
-12
25 Aug 2026, 13:52
48,127
-19
24 Aug 2026, 11:16
48,146
-7
22 Aug 2026, 21:34
48,153
+7
21 Aug 2026, 08:02
48,146
-17
20 Aug 2026, 10:44
48,163
-13
19 Aug 2026, 07:16
48,176
first reading
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 104 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
19.5%
avg views ÷ 47,968 subscribers
Avg views / post
9,360
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 25 September 2026
Posts held
151 (27 July 2026 – 25 September 2026)
Views total
505,600
Reactions total
7,292
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 22:34 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,880
Videos
≈1,510
Links
≈2,070
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 24m
Average length
2m 20s
Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
17,228 reactions across 143 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.9% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
3,600
20.9%
custom 5208952172133229569
3,320
19.3%
😁
2,900
16.8%
🙏
2,632
15.3%
🔥
2,512
14.6%
👎
1,203
6.98%
🫡
436
2.53%
🤔
337
1.96%
😢
213
1.24%
😱
40
0.232%
🤬
35
0.203%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 148 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 18,027 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
22
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 148 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akimapachev. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 151 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Довольно занятно наблюдать, как некоторые мои товарищи и коллеги, вчера еще поддерживающие какую-то политическую силу и топившие за выборы, вдруг начали ругать власть за повышение налогов и многие прочие новшества.
Вы серьезно? Типа вы не знали?
Очень удобно, знаете ли, тут вижу, тут не вижу.
Всегда говорил о том, что Госдума - институция России чуждая. А те сумасшедшие деньги, которые на эти выборы потратились, м…
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Всё в порядке. Восстановление идёт как надо, настроение боевое — остальное уже детали и вопрос времени. Совсем скоро буду снова в строю! Ваша поддержка очень сильно заряжает !
Для тех, кто хотел поддержать:
2202 2083 5377 1356 (Сбер)
Обращение к жителям Украины
Ко мне в комментарии с завидной регулярностью приходят "украинцы" со своими пропагандистскими протоколами. Какой-то вечный срач устраивают, чего-то доказать хотят. Причем чаще всего это далеко не глупые люди, со своей крепкой аргументацией. Обращаясь к ним, также хочу обратиться ко всем, кого угораздило почувствовать в себе украинскую "идею нации".
Знаете, почему вы ко мне приходите и че…
Только сейчас, когда мы наносим противнику критический урон, когда мы выкатили линейку высокотехнологических изделий, когда мы перестроили военную промышленность под современные задачи и вышли в эндшпиль в безоговорочном материальном перевесе, вот только сейчас с нами начали считаться, договариваться и куда-то там звать.
А нам оно теперь вообще надо? Владимир Владимирович, вот мы наконец-то начали по-настоящему. Не …
Ну а еще сегодня День Рождения самой любимой моей русской поэтессы Анны Ревякиной. (Совпадение?)
Аннушка, бесконечно рад нашей дружбе. Рад, что Господь открыл мне глаза на драгоценный камень, который под носом у меня лежал, а я, слабоглазый никак рассмотреть его не мог.
Теперь вот кручу в руках камень тот, к солнцу прикладываю да лучики отражения ловлю. Наглядеться не могу. Красивый, теплый, светлый.
Сила в тебе, …
У меня сегодня именины. Сегодня день памяти Иоакима Богоотца и Анны, родителей Девы Марии.
Так уж вышло, что сегодня еще и Дни Рождения моей мамы и моей дочки.
В целом, праздник сегодня у меня большой. С чем я себя и поздравляю.
Всем мир 🙏 Русским мир, естественно
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @akimapachev. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@akimapachev edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
13 August 2026
Most recent edit
13 September 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
The shares total 123%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 25 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 54 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 37 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 26 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Юлия Чичерина @julia_chicherina · 43,800 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
25/17 @official2517 · 24,985 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
Пётр Лундстрем @petrlundstrem · 23,826 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
RT.Док | Документальное кино @rtdocu · 44,098 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 16 September 2026
FRONT SIDE OF THE MEDAL @rsotmvideo · 93,211 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 16 September 2026
дима бамберг @dimitribamberg · 23,731 Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 September 2026
Екатерина Агранович @kaagranovich · 35,926 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
КАСПЕР 🇧🇾 @kasper_mus · 69,506 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 28 August 2026
Долгарева • Река Смородина @dolgarevaanna · 28,592 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
Владлен Татарский @vladlentatarsky · 174,452 Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 12 August 2026
Española | Организация «Эспаньола». ОФ @spainrus · 102,759 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 15 August 2026
PITBULL & EspañolA @OlympicPitbull · 35,119 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 2 September 2026
Объявления о работе в Африке @bold_advertising_agency · 43,667 Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 28 August 2026
Депутат Дмитрий Кузнецов @deputatdvkuznetsov · 21,074 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 25 September 2026
Морпех РОКОТ 🇷🇺 Антон Филимонов @morpexROKOT · 24,546 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 16 September 2026
Марьяна Батьковна @maryananaumova · 70,345 Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 20 August 2026
ЖОГА @zhogaartem · 40,470 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 30 August 2026
Енот из Херсона 🦝 @HersonEnot · 40,891 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 17 September 2026
Иван Охлобыстин @Ohlobistin · 69,554 Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 19 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Аким Апачев☀️ 🏹” (@akimapachev), 47,968 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akimapachev.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
