Концертов и альбомов в обозримом будущем не планируется. Будут программы и книги, но пока без музыки. Так что, собирайтесь на юбилейный концерт. Будем разрывать. БИЛЕТЫ

Channel
РИЧ
@rich_triphop
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
6,677subscribers
-83 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001517102404 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @rich_triphop |
| Created | 6 March 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 27 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 11 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/rich_triphop |
Topic
Music — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 11 Nov 2026, 10:02 | 6,677 | -5 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 08:21 | 6,682 | -3 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 11:06 | 6,685 | -2 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 18:41 | 6,687 | +1 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 21:39 | 6,686 | -3 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 07:49 | 6,689 | +7 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 6,682 | -1 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 01:35 | 6,683 | -5 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 23:14 | 6,688 | -5 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 14:09 | 6,693 | -1 |
| 13 Oct 2026, 00:49 | 6,694 | -8 |
| 7 Oct 2026, 01:18 | 6,702 | -6 |
| 30 Sept 2026, 05:16 | 6,708 | -7 |
| 19 Sept 2026, 13:57 | 6,715 | -7 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 15:18 | 6,722 | -11 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 04:57 | 6,733 | -6 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 22:25 | 6,739 | -4 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 06:44 | 6,743 | -1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 08:46 | 6,744 | -1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 14:24 | 6,745 | first reading |
Engagement
38 posts held, back to 4 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 61.1%
- avg views ÷ 6,677 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 4,080
- 13 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 13
- of 38 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 38 (4 July 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 53,000 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 16:24 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 4m 24s
- Average length
- 53s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 13 posts held from the last 30 days (30.8%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Нужно переслушать перед концертом последние альбомы: Переходный возраст Четыре осени Без фильтров БИЛЕТЫ
Как проходят наши концерты. Смотреть здесь: 16 ТОНН 2022 AGLOMERAT 2023 КОСМОНАВТ 2023 16 ТОНН 2023 16 ТОНН 2024 16 ТОНН 2024 БИЛЕТЫ
Премьера! Стал ведущим авторской программы «Пойдём поговорим» на Телеканале «78». Первый выпуск
НОВЫЙ АЛЬБОМ 25/17 "Подарок" (2026) Андрей Бледный: Всем привет. Сегодня у меня день рождения, и новый альбом 25/17 - это мой подарок самому себе. Но вы, конечно же, тоже можете его послушать. На всех площадках. 01. Подарок 02. Невидимка х Жар 03. Сердечко х Кристина Ра 04. Омела 05. Однажды 06. Магнитики х Варвара Котова 07. Сон х Аффинаж 08. Считай до ста х Тата Мартынова 09. Папина песня 10. Благодарность х Сер…
Ровно через две недели концерт в Москве. Презентация альбома "Переходный возраст". СЛУШАТЬ БИЛЕТЫ Фото: Дмитрий Провоторов
РИЧ — Переходный возраст СЛУШАТЬ БИЛЕТЫ
РИЧ – Переходный возраст Десятый, юбилейный альбом. Возможно, кому-то поможет пережить осень. СЛУШАТЬ БИЛЕТЫ Гости: 25/17 Обложка: Дмитрий Провоторов Музыка: bollywoodFM (1, 3, 4, 6, 7, 8), Лора (2, 5, 9) Запись, сведение: БО
Если ничего не сорвётся, то уже в эту пятницу выйдет новый альбом «Переходный возраст». Фото: Дмитрий Провоторов
Дни поздней осени бранят обыкновенно, Но мне она мила, читатель дорогой, Красою тихою, блистающей смиренно. Так нелюбимое дитя в семье родной К себе меня влечет. Сказать вам откровенно, Из годовых времен я рад лишь ей одной, В ней много доброго; любовник не тщеславный, Я нечто в ней нашел мечтою своенравной. Как это объяснить? Мне нравится она, Как, вероятно, вам чахоточная дева Порою нравится. На смерть осуждена, Бе…
Москва. Показ документального фильма «Борис Рыжий. Послесловие» БИЛЕТЫ
Встречаемся уже в следующем месяце. БИЛЕТЫ
Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @rich_triphop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @rich_triphop as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
- First seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Most recent seen missing
- 18 August 2026
- Median time before seen missing
- 16 days
- Seen missing in the last 30 days
- 0
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@elpicahielo · 20,0215 postsСАДКО 3000
@SADKO3000 · 1774 postsОТСТАВНИК ПРОТИВ
@otstavnik_protiv · 1722 postsБорис Рыжий. Интерактивная выставка о жизни поэта
@boris_ryzhiy_pfki · 2471 postАНТОН ВЯЧЕСЛАВОВИЧ
@krasovkin · 54,8111 post25/17
@official2517 · 25,4781 postПётр Лундстрем
@petrlundstrem · 23,5491 postРудалёв
@rudalev_andrej · 1,3591 postСловографика
@slovographica · 9,7631 postСаграда / Соль Земли
@sol_zemli_gruppa · 1,6901 postВВГ_книжная серия
@vvg_books · 901 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@readovkanews · 2,015,4197 postsСиняя Z Борода
@beard_tim · 107,5933 posts25/17
@official2517 · 25,4783 postsПётр Лундстрем
@petrlundstrem · 23,5493 postsРЭП ВЗВОД
@rapvzvodrussia · 1,0082 postsWarGonzo
@wargonzo · 738,0652 postsАлександр Пелевин Z
@comradepelevin · 19,8931 postMemorandum | Культура | Антропология | Документалистика | Книги | Люди |
@egomemorandum · 2361 postЛЕДОРУБ
@elpicahielo · 20,0211 postПофестивалили и будет
@festformat · 1201 postFYTW
@fuckyouthatswhy · 24,0551 postМЕТАМЕТРИКА
@Metametrica · 123,7951 postОТСТАВНИК ПРОТИВ
@otstavnik_protiv · 1721 postWAR AND EPILEPSY
@qashqul · 5781 postСАДКО 3000
@SADKO3000 · 1771 post16 Тонн
@sixteentons_club · 9,3051 postСловографика
@slovographica · 9,7631 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@official2517 · 25,478
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
@kaagranovich · 35,297
Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 2 September 2026
@elpicahielo · 20,021
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 28 September 2026
@comradepelevin · 19,893
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 29 September 2026
@julia_chicherina · 43,166
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 28 August 2026
@akimapachev · 47,332
Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026
@dimitribamberg · 24,213
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 17 September 2026
@petrlundstrem · 23,549
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 17 September 2026
@dolgareva · 19,615
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 30 September 2026
@dolgarevaanna · 28,305
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 September 2026
@YourNewsTalk · 19,187
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 1 October 2026
This channel appears in 11 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | No label recorded on this Wikidata item |
|---|
Referenced elsewhere
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
3 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
“…all the media existing in Russia".{{Cite web |title=РИЧ |url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455 |access-date=2022-09-18 |website=Telegram}}{{Cite…”
read 1 November 2026
“…все, просто все существующие в России медиа»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455|title=РИЧ|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-09-18|archi…”
read 1 November 2026
“…«рекомендують всі, просто всі медіа, що існують у Росії»{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/rich_triphop/455|title=РИЧ|website=Telegram|access-date=2022-09-18}}{{Cite…”
read 1 November 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“РИЧ” (@rich_triphop), 6,677 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/rich_triphop.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.