National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 32% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
61 measurements spanning 95 days, net -205. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 10,564–11,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
8 Nov 2026, 22:41
10,621
-4
7 Nov 2026, 15:58
10,625
+5
6 Nov 2026, 16:07
10,620
-5
5 Nov 2026, 16:45
10,625
-3
4 Nov 2026, 20:08
10,628
-2
3 Nov 2026, 23:15
10,630
-2
2 Nov 2026, 22:31
10,632
-2
1 Nov 2026, 19:06
10,634
-3
31 Oct 2026, 15:46
10,637
-5
30 Oct 2026, 16:56
10,642
-3
29 Oct 2026, 19:11
10,645
-6
28 Oct 2026, 17:47
10,651
-4
27 Oct 2026, 15:56
10,655
-5
26 Oct 2026, 12:31
10,660
+2
25 Oct 2026, 09:55
10,658
-2
24 Oct 2026, 12:05
10,660
-2
23 Oct 2026, 10:25
10,662
-8
22 Oct 2026, 10:44
10,670
-286
21 Oct 2026, 00:34
10,956
-5
19 Oct 2026, 20:21
10,961
first reading
Engagement
91 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 59 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
20.8%
avg views ÷ 10,621 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,210
27 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.61%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
28
of 91 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held
91 (27 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total
59,620
Reactions total
2,153
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Nov 2026, 10:36 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
831
Videos
691
Links
436
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Video runtime
2h 03m
Average length
4m 35s
Measured directly from 27 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,874 reactions across 86 posts, in 21 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,549
26.4%
🔥
1,310
22.3%
🙏
1,007
17.1%
👍
939
16.0%
❤🔥
260
4.43%
😁
256
4.36%
💯
117
1.99%
🎉
93
1.58%
🤬
90
1.53%
⚡
50
0.851%
👌
41
0.698%
💔
38
0.647%
custom 5458603043203327669
24
0.409%
🏆
24
0.409%
👏
24
0.409%
🥰
15
0.255%
😢
11
0.187%
🤔
11
0.187%
😱
8
0.136%
🤩
4
0.068%
1 further kind
3
0.051%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 90 of the 91 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,194 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 91 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
8
of 90 we hold a reading for · 9%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @kamerton_press. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 91 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 4 of 28 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
10 ноября — день рождения Михаила Тимофеевича Калашникова.
Родился в 1919 году. Конструктор, чьё имя стало известно во всём мире.
Его разработки изменили историю стрелкового оружия.
Автомат Калашникова стал одним из самых узнаваемых образцов вооружения в мире.
Человек, чья фамилия стала символом целой эпохи отечественного оружейного дела.
Михаил Тимофеевич Калашников. 1919–2013.
Вечная память!
@kamerton_press 😀 Мы ш…
5 НОЯБРЯ — ДЕНЬ ВОЕННОГО РАЗВЕДЧИКА
Разведка не терпит шума, ошибок и лишних слов. Здесь решают профессионализм, выдержка, точный расчёт и умение действовать в любых условиях.
Информация — оружие. Своевременное решение — преимущество. Выполненная задача — результат.
Честь и уважение военным разведчикам России. С праздником!
@kamerton_press 😀 Мы шли и будем идти вперед!
С Днём народного единства России!
Сила нашей страны — в единстве народа, в общей истории, верности Отечеству и готовности встать плечом к плечу в трудную минуту.
Разные поколения, разные судьбы — одна страна, одна Родина.
С праздником!
@kamerton_press 😀 Мы шли и будем идти вперед!
Сегодня Казанской иконы Божией Матери — праздник особенный, тёплый и душевный. Образ этот почитают с давних времён: по преданию, именно перед ним молились ополченцы Минина и Пожарского перед освобождением Москвы. Казанскую считают защитницей дома и семьи — икону часто ставят в красный угол, просят у неё здоровья близким и мира в доме.
Пусть в вашем доме сегодня будет светло, тепло и спокойно — с праздником!
@kamert…
Солёный пот нам жжет глаза.
На пике сердце замирает.
Идти туда, куда нельзя —
Нам путь стихии преграждают…
И шаг вперед сквозь вихрь и гром,
Сквозь ветра яростный напор,
Мы этот вызов принимаем —
Таков с судьбой наш уговор.
Пусть рвут одежду ветры в клочья,
Пусть тьма сгущается вокруг,
Дорога шепчет: «Будь упрямей,
Прорвись сквозь ледяной испуг».
И там, за гранью всех запретов,
Где небо сходится с землёй,
Откроется п…
Свершилось! В сквере Ермолова в Пятигорске установлен памятник «Крестовоздвижение»
Монумент посвящён реальному событию. В декабре 2024 года казаки бригады «Терек» вместе со священниками под обстрелом противника установили поклонный крест в Запорожской области. Автор проекта — Вадим Цыганов. Скульпторы — Сергей Полегаев и команда мастеров под руководством Вадима Борисовича Цыганова.
Над этим большим делом трудились …
Уже ставшие обыденностью, налеты вражеских дронов, которые наши мужчины встречают с неистовым азартом
Около 50 БПЛА противника атаковали позиции наших птичников. Встретили их достойно. С почестями и салютами 🤣
Группа Каштана|СпН «Ахмат» | ВК | MAX
🔥68👍12❤11🏆2⚡1🥰1custom 54586030432033276691
Showing the 12 most recent of 91 posts we hold for @kamerton_press. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts recorded as deleted after publishing
We recorded 1 post on @kamerton_press as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
First seen missing
9 November 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@kamerton_press named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@kamertom_press named in 6 posts, 8 August 2026 – 13 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Адам Делимханов @adelimkhanov_95 · 1,867,392 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
ЛОРД @mdaudov_95 · 1,837,058 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Отряд «Камертон Ахмат»” (@kamerton_press), 10,621 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kamerton_press.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
