Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
9 measurements spanning 8 days, net -14,418. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 975,102–993,846 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 11:54
977,265
-2,888
14 Aug 2026, 03:08
980,153
-1,555
13 Aug 2026, 00:14
981,708
-1,439
12 Aug 2026, 02:08
983,147
-1,802
11 Aug 2026, 03:06
984,949
-1,583
10 Aug 2026, 04:37
986,532
-1,958
9 Aug 2026, 01:31
988,490
-1,412
8 Aug 2026, 04:13
989,902
-1,781
7 Aug 2026, 05:01
991,683
first reading
Engagement
55 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 24 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.088%
avg views ÷ 977,265 subscribers
Avg views / post
856
54 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.392%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
55
of 55 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 52 of 54 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
55 (1 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
46,218
Reactions total
176
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
16 Aug 2026, 06:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,890
Videos
≈121
Links
≈1,940
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
2 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 128 interp. → 3.0 hours: 235still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
63 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
176 reactions across 52 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
113
64.2%
👍
23
13.1%
🔥
12
6.82%
⚡
6
3.41%
👏
5
2.84%
🫡
5
2.84%
🤗
3
1.70%
😇
2
1.14%
😱
2
1.14%
🤔
2
1.14%
👌
1
0.568%
👨💻
1
0.568%
🥰
1
0.568%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 176reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🟠 Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin ETF Raises $371M in First Three Months
Morgan Stanley's Bitcoin Trust (MSBT) pulled in $371.1 million in gross share proceeds during its first three months on the market, outpacing a $66.8 million paper loss recorded in the same period, according to a new regulatory filing.
The figures offer the clearest public look yet at how the fund has been performing since launch. The $66.8 million u…
🟠 Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs pull in $1.1 billion in a week
U.S. spot Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs recorded combined inflows of $1.1 billion last week, pointing to a notable shift in institutional sentiment toward crypto assets.
No further breakdown of the split between Bitcoin and Ethereum products was provided in the available source details.
Source
🟠 Grayscale: three forces will drive long-term Bitcoin adoption
Grayscale has outlined three structural drivers it believes will sustain Bitcoin adoption beyond the current market downturn: growing government deficits, expanding blockchain utility, and shifting portfolio preferences among investors.
The asset manager argues these trends could deepen Bitcoin's integration with traditional finance over time, even if …
⚖️ SEC Cancels Crypto Fundraising Meeting, Leaving Token Issuers in Limbo
The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission has cancelled a planned meeting on crypto fundraising, leaving token issuers without a clear regulatory path to raise development capital.
While the SEC's March guidance drew a distinction between tokens and investment contracts, capital raising for crypto projects still falls under general securiti…
💵 Tether clears first Big Four audit with $6.8B reserve surplus
KPMG U.S. issued an unqualified opinion on Tether International's 2025 financial statements on Aug. 13, 2026 — the company's first full audit from a Big Four accounting firm, ending years of criticism over its reserve transparency.
The audited figures show Tether's reserves exceeded liabilities by $6.814 billion as of Dec. 31, 2025. Unlike quarterly at…
🪙 Bitwise taps Superstate to tokenize crypto fund shares
Bitwise Asset Management has partnered with Superstate to build a system allowing investors to hold shares of select Bitwise funds as blockchain-based tokens. The Solana staking ETF is expected to be the first product considered for the structure.
The move marks a significant step in the tokenization of traditional fund vehicles, bridging regulated investment…
🚀 Real launched 90-day $ASSET staking with a pool of $75,000 USDC
The Real company opened a staking campaign for holders of the $ASSET token — from August 12 to November 10, 2026. The fixed prize pool is $75,000 USDC, and together with the previous Genesis campaign, the total distribution amount reaches $125,000 USDC.
The reward is calculated in proportion to the size and term of the steak. Participants of the firs…
🔐 Trezor Shipping Partner Breach Hits 13,689 Customers
Hardware wallet maker Trezor has disclosed that a data breach at its logistics partner ShipMonk exposed personal order data belonging to 13,689 customers across seven countries — the US, UK, Sweden, Colombia, Brazil, Italy and Portugal.
The breach affected customers who placed orders between May 10 and August 8, 2025. Exposed data includes names, contact detail…
⚖️ US SEC set to release tokenized stocks framework
The US Securities and Exchange Commission is preparing a regulatory framework for tokenized stocks, with an announcement expected as soon as Friday.
If confirmed, the move would mark one of the most significant regulatory developments for the crypto industry this year, bringing on-chain representations of equities under formal SEC guidance.
Source
🏦 Goldman Sachs acquires Neos to add Bitcoin and Ethereum ETFs
Goldman Sachs has agreed to acquire Neos Investments for up to $2.25 billion, a move that will bring three Bitcoin and Ethereum options-income ETFs into its asset management arm.
The three ETFs collectively manage more than $1.1 billion in assets. The acquisition expands Goldman's footprint in the fast-growing crypto ETF market as institutional demand f…
🪙 NEAR Intents crosses $25 billion in total volume
NEAR Protocol has announced that $25 billion has flowed through NEAR Intents, marking a significant milestone for the cross-chain transaction infrastructure.
NEAR Intents is designed to enable seamless asset transfers and swaps across multiple blockchains. The $25 billion figure reflects cumulative volume processed through the protocol since its launch.
Source
❤2👨💻1🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 769,744 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Nairaland Pulse | News @Nigerii_News · 944,303 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Naija Profit Zone @Naija_free · 1,107,746 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
Nigeria Football Hub @Football_Nigeria · 1,343,189 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 8 August 2026
Naija Sports Hub @Naija_Sports · 927,761 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
DEGEN Crypto Club @degen_Crypto_Hub · 1,085,789 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
GISTSLOVERSBLOG @gistlover @gistlover · 115,225 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 22 here — alongside 21 others — read 14 August 2026
Gist Ng - Nigeria News & Gossips @Gist_Ng · 104,324 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 August 2026
PRO BLOCKCHAIN INTERNATIONAL @cryptopbm · 213,721 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
Petrovskogo @Petrovskogo_V · 165,342 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Crypto Drop Club @drop_cryptogo · 1,533,807 Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 August 2026
HODL, FUCK! @hodl_fuck · 109,238 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026
Easy busy | with Tony Schneider 🇬🇧 @easy_busy_eng · 305,577 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
KRIPTOLOL | Заработок на инвестициях и криптовалюте @airolejon · 256,955 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Mr Bayo Space @mrbayospace · 97,225 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
KSANALYSIS.org 🦍🦍🦍 @KSANALYSIS1 · 239,996 Telegram ranks this channel #61 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 12 August 2026
СкуфиТОН @tonskuf · 124,341 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 13 August 2026
Sports Hub | Football @Sport_HUB_football · 1,450,834 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
ABRO @drgems_official · 170,396 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Engage ADS on Ton @EngageADS · 335,785 Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
ChangeNOW Announcements @CNAnnouncements · 129,035 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
KIWIBET @kiwibet01 · 219,229 Telegram ranks this channel #74 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
BETFUSE @betfuse0 · 542,563 Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Storm Trade | Новости ⚡️ @storm_trade_news_ru · 567,726 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 9 August 2026
Где деньги Криптовски @kriptovsky_drop · 150,246 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
9 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Crypto Pulse Nigeria” (@Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria), 977,265 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Crypto_Pulse_Nigeria.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.