National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Content that also appears on other registered channels
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 245 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 150 of the 784 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 14,811 comparable posts for this entry, running 23 May 2026 to 12 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).
Of the group of 245 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @akharinkhabar. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 13 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Channels linked by matching posts
This channel is in a group of 245 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
194 more channels are in this same group but not listed individually here.
Growth
66 measurements spanning 100 days, net -1,755. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 116,699–118,980 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 66
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
13 Nov 2026, 10:20
116,962
-37
11 Nov 2026, 01:28
116,999
-32
9 Nov 2026, 08:00
117,031
-28
8 Nov 2026, 01:31
117,059
-1
6 Nov 2026, 23:26
117,060
+7
5 Nov 2026, 22:36
117,053
-27
4 Nov 2026, 20:40
117,080
-9
3 Nov 2026, 17:35
117,089
-14
2 Nov 2026, 20:20
117,103
-24
1 Nov 2026, 20:41
117,127
-10
31 Oct 2026, 17:11
117,137
-38
30 Oct 2026, 13:56
117,175
-27
29 Oct 2026, 15:55
117,202
-27
28 Oct 2026, 13:51
117,229
+3
27 Oct 2026, 11:36
117,226
-23
26 Oct 2026, 14:36
117,249
-1
25 Oct 2026, 17:46
117,250
-25
24 Oct 2026, 15:16
117,275
+2
23 Oct 2026, 14:56
117,273
-26
22 Oct 2026, 14:14
117,299
first reading
Engagement
20,249 posts held, back to 23 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1,122 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
3.97%
avg views ÷ 116,962 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,650
1,127 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
1,129
of 20,249 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 November 2026
Posts held
20,249 (23 May 2026 – 13 November 2026)
Views total
5,236,760
Reactions total
—
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 04:29 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2h 04m
Average length
59s
Measured directly from 127 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 137 of 1,129 posts held from the last 30 days (12.1%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
سپاه: حمله به رادار امریکا در بحرین
🔹روابطعمومی سپاه:
رزمندگان هوافضای سپاه ساعتی پیش در پاسخ به تجاوز هوایی دشمن به یک دکل مخابراتی در سیریک، رادار هشدار اولیهٔ متجاوزان آمریکا در جزیرهٔ بحرین را هدفقرارداده و منهدم کردند.
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
حمله آمریکا به سیریک هرمزگان
منابع رسمی اعلام کردند سیریک در استان هرمزگان مورد اصابت دشمن قرار گرفت
اصابت صورت گرفته ماهیت نظامی دارد/ ایرنا
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
ترامپ:
اگر به «السید» در ایالت میشیگان نگاه کنید، او در میان رأیدهندگان یهودی، آرای بیشتری نسبت به نامزد جمهوریخواهان به دست آورد.
این موضوع اصلاً قابل درک نیست. جلب حمایت این گروه واقعاً دشوار است.
وقتی این ماجرا تمام شود، میتوانم به اسرائیل بروم و نخستوزیر شوم!
من محبوبترین فرد در اسرائیل هستم. ۹۹ درصد محبوبیت دارم.
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
آخرین وضعیت مرز بینالمللی شلمچه
ولی الله حیاتی شامگاه پنجشنبه از برنامه انتقال تشریفات گمرکی در مرز شلمچه به پارکینگ بزرگ اربعین برای ساماندهی تردد کامیونها و تسهیل صادرات خبر داد.
asriran.com/0053go
@MyAsriran
ماکرون: شواهد کافی برای اثبات دست داشتن قدرتهای خارجی در تهدیدهای بمبگذاری وجود ندارد
🔹امانوئل ماکرون، رئیس جمهور فرانسه: در حال حاضر، ما شواهد کافی و اثباتشدهای برای نسبت دادن تهدیدهای بمبگذاری در سراسر اروپا نداریم. در این مرحله، نمیتوانیم بگوییم که قدرتهای خارجی پشت این تماسها هستند.
🔹در روزهای آینده جلسهای با شورای دفاع و امنیت برای بحث در مورد این تهدیدها تشکیل خواهد داد./باشگاه خبرنگاران
Asriran.com…
آخرین وضعیت مرز بینالمللی شلمچه
🔹معاون امنیتی انتظامی استاندار خوزستان با تشریح آخرین وضعیت مرز بینالمللی شلمچه گفت: این مرز بهصورت شبانهروزی در حوزههای مسافری و تجاری فعال است و روزانه بیش از ۲۰ هزار نفر از پایانه مسافری آن تردد میکند./ایرنا
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
نشست امنیتی نتانیاهو و آیزنکوت دو ساعت طول کشید
🔹شبکه ۱۲ تلویزیون رژیم صهیونیستی گزارش داد که نشست توجیهی امنیتی بنیامین نتانیاهو، نخستوزیر، و سرلشکر گای مارکیزانو، دبیر نظامی او، با گادی آیزنکوت، رئیس حزب «یشار»، پس از دو ساعت به پایان رسید.
🔹بر اساس بیانیه مشترک منتشر شده، آیزنکوت در این نشست در جریان چالشهای امنیتی و سیاسی پیش روی اسرائیل در شرایط کنونی قرار گرفت.
🔹طرفین همچنین توافق کردند که در صورت نیاز، تب…
رویترز: سومین رابطه خارج از ازدواج جنسن هوانگ افشا شد
🔹جنسن هوانگ علاوه بر دو رابطه خارج از ازدواج که پیش از این فاش شده بود و منجر به استعفای او در روز پنجشنبه شد، یک رابطه صمیمی دیگر نیز با یک کارمند دیگر شرکت انویدیا داشته است.
🔹دو زن دیگر که نام آنها ذکر شده، آلیس هوانگ هستند که طبق ادعای سازمانهای اطلاعاتی آمریکا، مظنون به جاسوسی برای چین است، و همچنین کیمبرلی پاول، معاون رئیس شرکت انویدیا./ عصر ایران
Asrira…
اسرائیل هیوم: هدف نتانیاهو از دیدار با آیزنکوت کاهش انتقادات از آغاز جنگ علیه ایران در حین تشکیل دولت توسط آیزنکوت بوده است
Asriran.com
@MyAsriran
Signed Ali Kh
Showing the 12 most recent of 20,249 posts we hold for @MyAsriran. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 137 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 157 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
10
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
10
vacant every time we have ever looked
@MyAsriran named 10 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@myasrirsn named in 300 posts, 8 August 2026 – 5 November 2026
@bank_mehreiran named in 1 post, 12 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
@healthsea_admin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@irancelnews1 named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasiran named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasrian named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@myasrkahabr named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@nyasriran named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@sepahnewsiradmin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@ertebatino_admin named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 14 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
خبرگزاری خبرآنلاین @khabaronline_ir · 115,007 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
چندثانیه آنلاین @chandsanieh_news · 137,499 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 13 August 2026
فرارو @fararunews · 118,007 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 11 August 2026
سهند ایرانمهر @sahandiranmehr · 37,725 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
شرق @SharghDaily · 30,188 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 7 September 2026
پایگاه خبری الف @alef_news · 37,200 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 31 August 2026
اطلاعات آنلاین @ettelaatonline · 45,516 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 27 August 2026
خبر ۲۴ @bisto4news · 55,250 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 23 August 2026
سلام آنلاین @salamonlline · 53,735 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 100 here — alongside 99 others — read 19 August 2026
Tabnak | تابناک @TeleTabnak · 255,150 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
🌻🌾ایران تایمز🌽🌻 @iran_times · 26,657 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 10 September 2026
اعتمادآنلاین @EtemadOnline · 37,556 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 31 August 2026
رسانه خبری بامدادنو @baamdadeno · 101,419 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 14 August 2026
اصلاحات نیوز - رسانه @Eslahatnews · 137,001 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 13 August 2026
کانال خبری رادين @radinnews · 96,465 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 25 September 2026
اخبار فوری جهان (انتخاب) @Entekhab_Jahan · 34,483 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 3 September 2026
تجارت نیوز @tejaratnews · 45,992 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 27 August 2026
جماران @jamarannews · 83,697 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 18 August 2026
دیده بان ایران @didebaniran · 170,348 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 12 August 2026
پایگاه خبری انتخاب @entekhab_ir · 205,381 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 11 August 2026
هممیهن @hammihanonline · 39,093 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 30 August 2026
قیمت سکه،طلا،ارز،بورس @gheymateseketala · 54,940 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 48 here — alongside 47 others — read 23 August 2026
شبکه راوی @raavionline1 · 96,035 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 16 August 2026
تلویزیون روایت فردا | RFT @revayatfarda · 392,947 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 261 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
4 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“عصر ایران” (@MyAsriran), 116,962 subscribers as measured 13 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/MyAsriran.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.