Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Exciton Missile Program

Channel

Exciton Missile Program

@Exciton_missile_program

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

32,044subscribers

+1,443 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537306555
TypeChannel
Username@Exciton_missile_program
DescriptionTwitter (X): mohsenreyhani01 Blog: https://mreyhani.wordpress.com این کانال شخصی است و مطالب آن به صورت گاه به گاه و تصادفی آپدیت میشود.
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 November 2026
Measurements held64
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/Exciton_missile_program

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 55% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 11 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@Minas_Tirith2024/1594424 Oct 2026, 14:45 UTC@Exciton_missile_program/8228 · this entry24 Oct 2026, 14:55 UTC1.0010 minutes
@Minas_Tirith2024/1603328 Oct 2026, 12:53 UTC@Exciton_missile_program/8247 · this entry28 Oct 2026, 13:49 UTC1.0056 minutes
@Minas_Tirith2024/1611131 Oct 2026, 14:46 UTC@Exciton_missile_program/8266 · this entry31 Oct 2026, 19:08 UTC1.004.4 hours
@Exciton_missile_program/8210 · this entry22 Oct 2026, 15:21 UTC@P_raetorio/4859722 Oct 2026, 17:42 UTC1.002.3 hours
@Exciton_missile_program/8220 · this entry23 Oct 2026, 12:59 UTC@P_raetorio/4862123 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC1.002 minutes
@cataphract1/7013221 Oct 2026, 14:52 UTC@Exciton_missile_program/8205 · this entry21 Oct 2026, 14:56 UTC1.005 minutes
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@Minas_Tirith202496 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0028 minutes@Minas_Tirith2024 (55–41)
@P_raetorio73 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0036 minutesthis entry (40–33)
@cataphract148 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0042 minutes@cataphract1 (25–23)
@defence_news34 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0053 minutes@defence_news (18–16)
@RedLionCorps26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0050 minutes@RedLionCorps (14–12)
@RASTAKHIZ_PERSIAN15 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0080 minutesthis entry (13–2)
@jangaavaran13908 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.001.7 hoursthis entry (5–3)
@Military_Tweet13 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.002.9 hoursthis entry (9–4)
@Irandezh_online5 (5/5 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0069 minutes@Irandezh_online (5–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 27 of the 27 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 340 comparable posts for this entry, running 3 August 2026 to 10 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 11 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @RedLionCorps. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 11 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

30,57035,59533,082.532,0446 August 202611 November 2026
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net +1,443. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29,816–36,349 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Nov 2026, 00:4632,044+18
9 Nov 2026, 08:3932,026+13
7 Nov 2026, 23:0632,013+94
6 Nov 2026, 20:1131,919+8
5 Nov 2026, 21:1531,911+174
4 Nov 2026, 19:1631,737-15
3 Nov 2026, 15:4731,752+5
2 Nov 2026, 19:1031,747+3
1 Nov 2026, 19:2831,744+27
31 Oct 2026, 21:3531,717+14
30 Oct 2026, 18:4931,703+16
29 Oct 2026, 19:5631,687+16
28 Oct 2026, 21:2731,671+65
27 Oct 2026, 16:5731,606+17
26 Oct 2026, 17:5131,589-9
25 Oct 2026, 17:1031,598-5
24 Oct 2026, 16:0931,603+6
23 Oct 2026, 16:5931,597+71
22 Oct 2026, 14:0031,526+36
21 Oct 2026, 09:0131,490first reading

Engagement

408 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 168 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.1%
avg views ÷ 32,044 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,900
162 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
162
of 408 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held408 (3 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total1,772,331
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 10:08 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈5,330
Videos
≈1,130
Links
≈613

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2h 52m
Average length
1m 55s

Measured directly from 90 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 162 posts held from the last 30 days (4.94%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 10:00 UTC871 viewsread 11 November 2026

تحلیل برخی عین گربه مرتضی علی است. هر طرف که آنها را بیندازی آخر 4 دست و پا روز زمین هستند. هر خطایی را یک نکته مثبت از آن برداشت میکنند. هنوز یادم هست که یک عده می‌گفتند این 7 اکتبر را اسرائیل خودش درست کرده است که فلان بهمان کند. علت هم اینست که تاریخ امنیتی اسرائیل را نخوانده اند. اسرائیلی ها واقعا خبره های امنیتی هستند. اما به این معنی نیست که اشتباهات نکرده اند. بارها گفتم، اسرائیلیها حتی از حمله مصری ها در یوم …

11 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC≈5,070 viewsread 11 November 2026

توانمندی در دستیابی به اطلاعات، لزوما معادل تحلیل اطلاعاتی دقیق نیست. کمتر کسی در توانمندی اطلاعاتی اسرائیلی‌ها در ایران تردید دارد. اما در دو نقطه، خامی تحلیلی و شاید شتاب‌زدگی امنیتی آن‌ها را به علت فرصت استثنایی‌ای که با همکاری آمریکا در اختیار داشتند، مشاهده کردم: 1- حمله بی‌جهت به زندان اوین با تصورات نادرست 2- حمله به پایگاه‌های بسیج و نیروی انتظامی در روزهای نخست. این در حالی بود که مشاهدات میدانی نشان می‌داد …

11 Nov 2026, 08:10 UTC≈3,860 viewsread 11 November 2026

اینرا دیدم، به یاد رشته توییت قدیمی خودم در رابطه با حمله تکنیکی لوفت وافه به بندر باری ایتالیا که در اشغال متفقین بود افتادم. یکی از آخرین رشته توییتهایی که با موضوع جنگ جهانی دوم نوشتم که به نظرم رشته توییت بدی نیست، با عکسهای خوب. قبلا تاریخ جنگ جهانی دوم در جامعه میلیتاری بیشتر مورد توجه بود، اکنون کسی حوصله ندارد. خواستید با زدن روی Instant View به همراه عکسهایش ببینید. https://fixupx.com/mohsenreyhani01/status…

11 Nov 2026, 07:44 UTC≈3,790 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @cataphract1Photo

⚜در چنین شبی در سال ۱۹۴۰، ۲۱ فروند بمب‌افکن اژدرافکن «سوردفیش» متعلق به ناو هواپیمابر بریتانیایی «ایلاستریوس»، ناوگان دریایی ایتالیا را که در بندر تارانتو مستقر و لنگر انداخته بود، هدف حمله قرار دادند. ⚜در این عملیات شبانه، حدود شش فروند از شناورهای جنگی ایتالیا آسیب دیدند که سه فروند از آن‌ها ناو جنگی بودند. حمله به تارانتو نقطه عطفی در تاریخ جنگ دریایی به شمار می‌رود؛ چراکه نشان داد هواپیماهای مستقر بر ناوهای هواپ…

10 Nov 2026, 20:38 UTC≈4,510 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @Minas_Tirith2024Video

ویدئو منتشر شده از سوی نیروی هوایی عربستان و حمله به تاسیسات مونتاژ و اسمبل موشک های بالستیک در صنعا @Minas_Tirith2024

10 Nov 2026, 20:05 UTC≈3,990 viewsread 11 November 2026

نتانیاهو در کنست: در آینده‌ای بسیار نزدیک، با فشارهای بین‌المللی برای پذیرش یک ایرانِ مجهز به سلاح هسته‌ای مواجه خواهیم شد. فشارهایی بر ما وجود دارد تا از دستاوردهایی که در سوریه، لبنان و غزه — و همچنین در یهودا و سامره (کرانه باختری) — کسب کرده‌ایم، دست بکشیم. در این شرایط نمی‌توان به دولتی متشکل از "اسرائیل‌ستیزان" تکیه کرد؛ و منظورم اعراب نیست، بلکه کسانی را می‌گویم که از اسرائیل متنفرند.»

10 Nov 2026, 12:41 UTC≈9,090 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

یک حدس فوق العاده ضعیف با درصد بسیار کم از این موشک سانسور شده میتوان زد. اینست اگر فرض کنیم این ناپیوستگی بدنه و سر موشک در اثر افکت سانسور موشک نیست شاید ورودی هوا باشد. ورودی هوا هم اینقدر جلو قرار داشته باشد نمیتوان چیزی گفت ولی شاید یک شکل سوپرسونیک این را تداعی کند. مشکل این حدس (سوپرسونیک) اینست که پایه و سکویی که روی آن قرار گرفته ضعیف است، یعنی بدنه سنگین نیست و فریم سبکی دارد و شاید خیلی مقاوم نباشد. در هر …

10 Nov 2026, 11:50 UTC≈14,200 viewsread 11 November 2026

از نوع و برد موشکها یک حدس میتوان زد که این پایگاه شاید متعلق به یک پایگاه در نقاط نه چندان عمیق کشور و شاید در نواحی جنوبی کشور باشد. حضور گسترده موشکهای کروز، حضور موشک جهاد، موشک قیام.... @Exciton_missile_program 🚀

10 Nov 2026, 11:31 UTC≈6,520 viewsread 11 November 2026
Forwarded from @P_raetorioPhoto

نیرو هوافضای سپاه پاسداران انقلاب اسلامی با پخش تصاویری از افتتاح پایگاه موشکی جدید خود توسط سرلشکر عبدالهی،رئیس ستاد نیرو‌های مسلح و سرتیپ موسوی فرمانده سازمان هوافضای سپاه پاسداران خبر داد. @P_raetorio

10 Nov 2026, 10:37 UTC≈16,600 viewsread 10 November 2026

فهرستی از برخی حملات زیرساختی ج.ا. به تأسیسات کشورهای منطقه در طول جنگ 40 روزه جمع‌آوری کردم که همراه با سطح اثرگذاری و روز وقوع هر کدام است. این فهرست از آن جهت در خور توجه است که می‌تواند منظور از «اثربخشی حملات آمریکایی و اسرائیلی برای سرکوب توان آفندی در خاک ایران و جنگ زیرساختی» را روشن‌تر کند؛ یعنی نشان دهد که توان آسیب‌رسانی به زیرساخت‌های منطقه تا چه روزهایی و با چه سطوحی همچنان برقرار بوده یا کاهش یافته است:…

10 Nov 2026, 07:45 UTC≈4,520 viewsread 10 November 2026
Video

سردار بلالی مشاور فرمانده نیروی هوافضای سپاه: موشک فتاح 2 با الگوریتم‌های مختلف مانورهایی را انجام می‌دهد تا مانع از پیش‌بینی نقطه آتی مسیر پروازی توسط پدافند شود. پیش از این شایعاتی از لغو پروژه فتاح 2 در فضای مجازی مطرح شده بود که بنظر می‌رسد واقعیت ندارد. @Military_Tweet

10 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC≈12,700 viewsread 10 November 2026
Photo

منظور تلویحی بلینکن اینست که در نهایت باید امتیاز بدهید، پس فشار بیشتری بیاورید تا با شرایط بهتری امتیاز به طرف ایرانی بدهید. سرنخ همه اینها به بن و بستها و توانمندی های فنی میرسد. اثر پروانه ای پایگاه موشکی که نتوانستی کامل سرکوبش کنی، اینگونه چندین سال حزب جمهوری خواه را به فنا داد. موشک ضد کشتی که قرار بود ناو غرق کند، فعلا کار نکرده است و هزینه محاصره کمی به صرفه تر شده است و کشور به بدترین محاصره اقتصادی ممکن …

Showing the 12 most recent of 408 posts we hold for @Exciton_missile_program. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@Exciton_missile_program edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 October 2026
Most recent edit
8 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 2 posts on @Exciton_missile_program as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
22 September 2026
Most recent seen missing
5 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
37 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 29 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

جنگاوران
@jangaavaran1390 · 136,954
#1
کاتافراکت
@cataphract1 · 59,718
#2
🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷
@defence_news · 49,297
#3
Minas Tirith
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,134
#4
Military Times🎖
@Military_Times_Blog · 13,970
#5
Red Lion Corps
@RedLionCorps · 25,235
#6
TAC OPS
@TAC_OPS · 13,386
#7
Praetorio
@P_raetorio · 40,928
#8
✍️𝐖𝐀𝐑 𝐑𝐎𝐎𝐌 | اتاق جنگ⚔️
@WAR_ROOM_NEWS · 17,062
#9
Tankograd🛡
@SNTankograd · 21,419
#10
Partisan / پارتیزان
@partisan2015 · 62,766
#11
Samuel
@samueltarikh · 19,389
#12
Iranian Naval Force
@Navy_Iranian · 20,805
#13
میلیتاری در پارسی
@militaryinpersian · 19,853
#14
توئیت نظامی
@Military_Tweet · 18,251
#15
بامداد خاور
@Bamdad_Khavar · 4,528
#16
NEUTRINO
@neutrino_x · 15,638
#17
MILITA CAMP
@Milita_Camp · 23,742
#18
Iranian Defensive Power
@iranian_defensive_power · 13,117
#19
🗽🅤🅢.🅐🅡🅜🅨.🅓🅐🅣🅐
@USAMRYDATA · 8,154
#20
MESHKAT | مشکات
@Projectmeshkat · 19,393
#21
𝐆𝐔𝐀𝐑𝐃 𝐖𝐀𝐑𝐑𝐈𝐎𝐑𝐒
@guard_warriors · 6,063
#22
RASTAKHIZ
@RASTAKHIZ_PERSIAN · 16,822
#23
🇮🇷Defender IRAN🇮🇷
@irDefender · 95,728
#24
بن بست خاورمیانه Middle East Dead End
@Middleeastdeadend · 11,353
#25
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین
@vahidonline · 1,386,989
#26
مملکته
@mamlekate · 560,865
#27
خشاتریا
@Khashateria_Cata · 6,800
#28
اخبار سوریه
@syriankhabar · 89,604
#29
انتخابات آمریکا... ادامه راه
@usgelections · 9,881
#30
Military Humor
@military_humor · 4,657
#31
میلیتاری در جهان موازی
@MilitaryDarJahanMovazi · 4,091
#32
Military Podcast | پادکست نظامی 🎙
@mili_podcast · 20,754
#33
MilitaryQuiz
@MilitaryQuiz · 1,946
#34
Iran International ایران اینترنشنال
@iranintltv · 1,380,853
#35
فرازِ خاکستری
@FarazTheGrey · 1,601
#36
GENERAL
@General_persiian · 34,887
#37
اخبار امنیتی - نظامى
@tasnim_military · 8,588
#38
🎬 بیسیمچی مدیا
@bisimchimedia · 1,031,053
#39
NEUTRINO_RADIATION
@neutrino_radiation · 4,653
#40
(Irandaily24) ایران دیلی
@iran_daily24 · 17,522
#41
BBCPersian
@bbcpersian · 771,493
#42
🇮🇷Defenders Plus+
@defenders_plus · 30,009
#43
Fighter Radar | فایتر رادار
@fighter_radar · 186,227
#44
🇺🇸 امریکانا 🇺🇸
@Americana_ir · 13,272
#45
سودابه قیصری
@soudabeh_qaisari · 8,757
#46
Neutrino
@T_neutrino · 5,239
#47
هوافضای کاسموس
@rus_cosmos · 6,804
#48
محمد مهدی بابایی - اخبار جنگ
@m_Mahdibaba · 138,417
#49
AirCraft ✈️
@AirCraft_ir · 15,396
#50
Mohammad Aleph
@mohammadaleph · 6,626
#51
کاوش مدیا
@kavoshmedia · 73,413
#52
Patriot meme
@MGC1400 · 15,773
#53
Parvaz dar oj
@Parvazdaroj · 32,163
#54
مهمات
@mohem_mat · 21,620
#55
Task Force Artemis⚓️
@Artemis_Force · 11,631
#56
NAVY FORCE
@Navy_force · 2,800
#57
اقوال الانعام
@aqvalanam · 41,105
#58
📋Mɪʟɪᴛᴀʀʏ Aʀᴛɪᴄʟᴇs
@Army_Ir · 2,474
#59
وایو(دست نوشته ها)
@vayuvata · 2,146
#60
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,305,082
#61
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,733,010
#62
تاریخ قرن بیستم WW1-WW2
@historyworldwar2 · 28,437
#63
MSAI
@M_S_A_Institute · 933
#64
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 318,342
#65
Anarconomy
@anarconomy · 46,078
#66
VPN CLUB
@wbnet · 227,373
#67
𝐒𝐤𝐲 𝐀𝐢𝐫𝐥𝐢𝐧𝐞𝐬
@Sky_Airlines · 4,549
#68
Zoomit | زومیت
@thezoomit · 132,579
#69
Digiato | دیجیاتو
@Digiato · 115,453
#70
Aerospacetalk
@aerospacetalk · 10,581
#71
TechTube 𝕏 تک توب
@TechTube · 75,094
#72
FactNameh | فکت‌نامه
@factnameh · 109,848
#73
Toos Tahmasebi
@toos1989 · 5,573
#74
توییتر فارسی
@officialpersiatwiter · 569,491
#75
خبرهای فوری مهم 🔖
@khabar_fouri · 1,148,952
#76
لژیون
@legion_cata · 1,582
#77
پایگاه خبری انتخاب
@entekhab_ir · 205,381
#78
⚽️Dashagh News⚽️
@Dashaghnews · 111,808
#79
IRCF | اینترنت آزاد برای همه
@ircfspace · 97,082
#80
چین‌نگار
@ChinNegar · 4,059
#81
رسانه خبری بامدادنو
@baamdadeno · 101,535
#82
‌ Do You Know | مجله ™
@razcom · 1,218,000
#83
🌐مطالب تاریخی
@matalebtarikhim · 30,312
#84
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,860,139
#85
Scale Modeling world VH
@SMWVh1 · 1,244
#86
مووی کاتیج
@CottageOrg · 744,032
#87
Zoomg | زومجی
@myzoomg · 85,975
#88
Meme template
@persian_meme_template · 488
#89
Alireza.S
@cryptobyalireza · 36,647
#90
TMS
@TMSCGC · 4,546
#91
Vigiato | ویجیاتو
@vigiatonet · 83,789
#92

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 6 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Tankograd🛡
@SNTankograd · 21,419
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 25 September 2026
Praetorio
@P_raetorio · 40,928
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 30 August 2026
کاتافراکت
@cataphract1 · 59,718
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 22 August 2026
Red Lion Corps
@RedLionCorps · 25,235
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 15 September 2026
🇮🇷وقایع الاتفاقیه نظامی🇮🇷
@defence_news · 49,297
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 25 August 2026
میلیتاری در پارسی
@militaryinpersian · 19,853
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 27 September 2026
Military Podcast | پادکست نظامی 🎙
@mili_podcast · 20,754
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 24 September 2026
Minas Tirith
@Minas_Tirith2024 · 43,134
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 29 August 2026
جنگاوران
@jangaavaran1390 · 136,954
Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 13 August 2026
یدالله کریمی پور
@Karimipour_K · 21,452
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 23 September 2026
Iranian Naval Force
@Navy_Iranian · 20,805
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 29 September 2026
MILITA CAMP
@Milita_Camp · 23,742
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 19 September 2026
world_newsly
@World_Newsly · 261
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
MESHKAT | مشکات
@Projectmeshkat · 19,393
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 2 October 2026
دانشگاه صوتی چکیده ماندگار | خلاصه کتاب تاریخی، سیاسی
@EsfandiarKhodaee · 23,813
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 99 here — alongside 98 others — read 19 September 2026
مجله سلامت و پزشکی 🫀
@DrSalamat_Journal · 22,848
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 16 September 2026
Partisan / پارتیزان
@partisan2015 · 62,766
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 21 August 2026
Fighter Radar | فایتر رادار
@fighter_radar · 186,227
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
Parvaz dar oj
@Parvazdaroj · 32,163
Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 9 September 2026
دیپلماسی
@Bestdiplomacy · 19,746
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 30 September 2026
🇮🇷Defenders Plus+
@defenders_plus · 30,009
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 September 2026
🇮🇷Defender IRAN🇮🇷
@irDefender · 95,728
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 22 August 2026
GENERAL
@General_persiian · 34,887
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 3 September 2026
(تحلیل نظامی و اخبار جنگ) MilitaryToday.IR
@MILITARYTODAYIR · 25,556
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026

This channel appears in 51 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exciton Missile Program” (@Exciton_missile_program), 32,044 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Exciton_missile_program.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.