Channel
@wbnet
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
230,462subscribers
-289 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001058462925 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @wbnet |
| Created | 15 May 2016 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/wbnet |
Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 76% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:24 | 230,462 | -37 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 21:34 | 230,499 | -51 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 230,550 | -72 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 00:30 | 230,622 | -38 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 230,660 | -33 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:10 | 230,693 | -27 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:41 | 230,720 | -31 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:54 | 230,751 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:33 | 230,751 | first reading |
65 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 65 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 771,690 |
| Reactions total | 2,956 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 17:55 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2,845 reactions across 62 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 76.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,182 | 76.7% | |
| 👌 | 429 | 15.1% | |
| 🤩 | 148 | 5.20% | |
| 😍 | 86 | 3.02% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 65 of the 65 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,956reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @wbnet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 65 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
کشور ایران رو انتخاب کنید. بعد ازتون میپرسه که آیا از VPN یا ابزار دور زدن فیلترینگ استفاده میکنید؛ گزینه Yes / بله رو بزنید. در مرحله آخر هم نام سرویس یا فیلترشکنی که در حال استفاده ازش هستید رو وارد کنید.
🧪 تست سرعت و پایداری VPN و پروکسی این وبسایت مربوط به پروژه GreatFire هست؛ همون پروژهای که قبلاً Free Browser و GreatFire VPN رو هم ازش معرفی کرده بودیم. این ابزار به شما کمک میکنه عملکرد VPN یا پروکسیتون رو در شرایط واقعی اینترنت بررسی کنید و مواردی مثل سرعت دانلود، تأخیر (Latency) و پایداری اتصال رو بسنجید. 📊 همچنین میتونید ببینید اتصال شما برای کارهایی مثل پخش ویدیو در یوتیوب، استفاده از پیامرسانهایی مثل…
❤6
تغییرات این نسخه 🚀 LxBox v2.20.7 منتشر شد مهمترین تغییرات: 🧪 Mass Actions برای Subscriptionها بعد از تست سرورها میتونی با یک گزینه تمام نودهای قطع یا کندتر از یک سرعت مشخص رو غیرفعال کنی؛ دیگه لازم نیست صدها نود رو دستی خاموش کنی. 🔍 Diagnostics جدید حالا بدون اینکه اتصال فعلیات قطع بشه، میتونی ببینی هر نود از دید اینترنت چه چیزی نمایش میده: Exit IP، موقعیت جغرافیایی، وضعیت WARP (warp=) و پاسخ سرویسهایی مثل…
❤16🤩4👌1
File, posted without a caption
❤19👌3
🚀 نسخه 2.20.7 کلاینت LxBox منتشر شد اگه هنوز LxBox رو نمیشناسید، بد نیست یه نگاهی بهش بندازید. این پروژه یکی از جدیدترین کلاینتهای Sing-box محسوب میشه و با سرعت خوبی در حال توسعهست. امکاناتش هم اونقدر زیاده که میتونه در آینده به یکی از رقیبهای جدی NekoBox و Clash تبدیل بشه. ✨ برخی از قابلیتها: • پشتیبانی از VLESS، VMess، Trojan، Shadowsocks، Hysteria2، TUIC، Naive، SSH، WireGuard، AmneziaWG 2.0 و MASQUE • پشت…
❤18🤩2👌1😍1
🚨 این دسترسیها مربوط به یکی از VPNهای رایگان و بسیار پرطرفداره؛ VPNای که اتفاقاً در ایران هم کار میکنه! 😳 چیزی که واقعاً نگرانکنندهست اینه که این برنامه ۳۵ دسترسی مختلف به گوشی درخواست میکنه. این یعنی قبل از اینکه فقط به «وصل شدن VPN» فکر کنیم، باید ببینیم یک اپلیکیشن VPN واقعاً به چه مجوزهایی نیاز داره و چرا؟ ⚠️ نکته عجیبتر اینکه این VPN توسط بعضی یوتیوبرها و پیجهای اینستاگرامی پربازدید هم معرفی و تبلیغ میشه…
👌54❤16🤩3😍1
من اینجا قبلتر درمورد اینکه چطور بدون دانش فنی متوجه بدافزار و ناامن بودن یک vpn متوجه بشیم همچنین تست با https://reports.exodus-privacy.eu.org/en/
❤22🤩2
🔥 هشدار: وقتی VPNهای ناامن رایگان گوشیتان را به «مزرعه آیپی» تبدیل میکنند (قبل از نصب هر VPN رایگانی، این را بخوانید!) 🔴 چرا نصب بعضی از VPNهای رایگان، گوشی را داغ، باتریرا خالی و حجم را تمام میکند؟ حتماً برایتان پیش آمده: یکی از دوستان یک VPN رایگان معرفی کرده، نصبش میکنید، اما از همان روز اول گوشیتان عجیب داغ میکند، باتری یکدفعه خالی میشود و حجم اینترنتتان مثل برق میپرد! خیلیها فکر میکنند تقصیر …
❤32👌10🤩1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤8
🌐 اینبار عددها حرف میزنند. 💎 در ویدیوی بالا، تست سرعت و پینگ چند لوکیشن پرمصرف میان کاربران ایرانی را مستقیماً روی WBNET Premium Plus میبینید؛ بدون روایت اضافه و بدون اینکه لازم باشد چیزی را از ما باور کنید. ✅ ما معتقدیم کیفیت واقعی یک سرویس، در متن تبلیغاتی مشخص نمیشود؛ در لحظهای مشخص میشود که روی اتصال واقعی خودتان، سایت باز میکنید، بازی میکنید، تماس میگیرید یا یک کار مهم را بدون فکر کردن به اینترنت انجا…
❤36👌6🤩3😍2
File, posted without a caption
❤37
🤖💻🐱 Relay یک ابزار متنباز (Open Source) و متمرکز بر حریم خصوصی است که به شما اجازه میدهد اینترنت یک دستگاه را از طریق هاتاسپات Wi-Fi با دستگاه دیگر به اشتراک بگذارید؛ آن هم بدون نیاز به هیچ تنظیمات دستی شبکه. کافی است هاتاسپات را روی گوشی اندرویدی خود فعال کنید، سپس با لپتاپ ویندوزی کد QR را اسکن کنید تا تمام ترافیک لپتاپ از طریق اینترنت گوشی عبور کند؛ حتی اگر روی گوشی VPN فعال باشد، لپتاپ نیز از همان VPN است…
❤47🤩4
Showing the 12 most recent of 65 posts we hold for @wbnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔴 افزایش گزارشها از کاهش سرعت اینترنت از عصر امروز با توجه به گزارشهای دریافتی، به نظر میرسه اینترنت برای بخشی از کاربران با افت محسوسی مواجه شده. کاربران از کاهش سرعت و پهنای باند، افزایش پینگ و پکتلاست خبر میدن. 📊 وضعیت اینترنت شما الان چطوره؟
The shares total 121%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 65 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank — 14,149 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 25 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 135 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“VPN CLUB” (@wbnet), 230,462 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/wbnet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.