Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -42. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 142,007–142,092 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 01:58
142,017
-27
11 Aug 2026, 03:41
142,044
-35
10 Aug 2026, 00:43
142,079
-3
9 Aug 2026, 03:11
142,082
+6
8 Aug 2026, 01:05
142,076
+20
6 Aug 2026, 21:31
142,056
-3
6 Aug 2026, 01:31
142,059
no change
5 Aug 2026, 22:00
142,059
first reading
Engagement
252 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
11.1%
avg views ÷ 142,017 subscribers
Avg views / post
15,700
252 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
252
of 252 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 251 of 252 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
252 (5 August 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
3,965,893
Reactions total
147,306
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 18:13 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈52,400
Videos
≈16,800
Links
≈17,100
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 16m
Average length
1m 11s
Measured directly from 65 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
137,219 reactions across 231 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
57,776
42.1%
👍
36,883
26.9%
❤🔥
12,057
8.79%
🤬
9,922
7.23%
💔
6,881
5.01%
😢
4,262
3.11%
👎
3,243
2.36%
🤯
2,673
1.95%
😐
1,956
1.43%
👏
697
0.508%
🔥
609
0.444%
🤔
260
0.189%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 251 of the 252 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 147,306reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 252 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
10
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 252 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @uttweet. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 252 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 12 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
اگر ایدهای دارید، اما توضیح دادنش به هوشمصنوعی با متن سختِ؛
یا اصلاً نمونهیِ دقیقی از چیزی که میخواید وجود نداره.
با ابزارِ Squig :
🔗 https://squig.sh/
میتونید خیلی سریع یک طرح اولیه از ایدهتون بکشید و همون رو به هوش مصنوعی بدید تا بهتر متوجه منظور شما بشه و نسخهی واقعی رو بسازه!
🔗 جهت تهیه انواعِ اکانتهایِ هوش مصنوعی میتونید با @ElizaiumHelp در ارتباط باشید.
🔗 بررسی دقیقِ هوش مصنوعیها در @Eliza
یک فریم از ورشکستگی اقتصادی
شما هر بار نیاز به دستمال کاغذی داشته باشی، یک اسکناس هزار تومنی برداری و توش فین کنی، مقرون بهصرفهتره تا اینکه از دستمال کاغذی استفاده کنی!
نه سازش، نه تسلیم، فقط قهقرا!
_Fëanor_
@uttweet
دوستم وسواس داره و به تازگی کات کرده امشب داشت گریه میکرد پیشم، وسط گریه هاش گفت خیلی تمیززز بودددد. ببین سخت ترین کار دنیا بود تو حال بدش بلندترین قهقه عمرمو نزنم :))))))))))))))
_یلدا_
@uttweet
آغاز عرضه بنزین با نرخ تمامشده پالایشگاهی به مبلغ هر لیتر ۸۷ هزار و ۲۰۰ تومان از بامداد پنجشنبه (۲۱ مردادماه) در ۲۰۴ جایگاه سوخت استان کرمان!
_twitterbource_
@uttweet
هر تغییری که تو آیلتس یا تافل اتفاق میافته، معمولاً اول از همه توی کامیونیتی داوطلبها دیده میشه، نه کتابها.
توی گروه تافل تستینو بیشتر از ۲۱ هزار نفر درباره منابع، روش مطالعه، تجربه آزمون و تغییرات جدید حرف میزنن.
توی گروه آیلتس تستینو هم بیشتر از ۴۰ هزار نفر تجربه آزمون در کشورهای مختلف، هزینهها و هماهنگی سفرهاشون رو به اشتراک میذارن.
اشتیاق بیش از حد به ثبت لحظهها با دوربین گوشی، حافظهٔ واقعی ما را ضعیف میکند و توانایی تجربهٔ آرام و بیواسطهٔ زندگی را از ما میگیرد.
وقتی در کنسرت، سفر یا حتی جمعهای خانوادگی همیشه یک لنز میان ما و واقعیت فاصله میاندازد، در عمل «در آن لحظه حضور نداریم». در چنین وضعیتی، زندگی واقعی جای خودش را به یک نمایش میدهد؛ ما پیش از هر چیز به این فکر میکنیم که «چطور این صحنه را قاب بگیریم تا برای دیگران جذاب باشد؟» و ه…
🔷 فیلم | اعتراف غلامحسین ساعدی به ارتباط با سازمان تروریستی چریکهای فدایی خلق برای ترور محمد صادق فاتح، بزرگترین کارآفرین ایرانی در سال ۱۳۵۳:
«فتحعلی پناهیان جوان بیست و چند ساله، بچه عجیبی بود. سیانور هم در گوشه زبانش. همان بود که سرمایهدار گردن کلفت کرجی را کشت، همان که چای جهان را داشت» غلامحسین ساعدی/فصلنامه الفبا
مراد ساعدی از «گردن کلفت»، یکی از بزرگترین کوشندگان آبادانی و از مهمترین کارآفرینان ایران بو…
🤬366💔45👎6👍3😢2
Showing the 12 most recent of 252 posts we hold for @uttweet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 184 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 282 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
لینک ورود به چنل اصلی @Daneshjoo · 408 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 10 August 2026
مجله هنرى ژوان🕊 @zhuanchannel · 226,669 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
Virauniversity | ویرا @virauniversitycom · 382,978 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
تهران پادکست | پادکست و کتاب صوتی @tehranpodcast · 228,444 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
کاف @kafiha · 700,303 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 8 August 2026
BOOK™ @lBOOKl · 189,357 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
توییتر فارسی @officialpersiatwiter · 567,583 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
PDF | پی دی اف @PDFsCom · 301,977 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Soul of Dream️️ @SoulofDream · 169,132 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
درتی کیدز @Dirty_Kids · 192,008 Telegram ranks this channel #24 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 11 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist @Playlistpodcas · 152,133 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
عآلیجناب @Aalijnab · 359,368 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
کتابخانه @BookTop · 355,857 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
اخبار تهران @akhbartehran · 717,424 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 8 August 2026
🎥 CinemaFact 📺 @MyCinemaFact2 · 290,493 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
Vahid Online وحید آنلاین @vahidonline · 1,424,821 Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
ԼαԼαԼαɴƊ™ @LaLaLandTm · 200,134 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 11 August 2026
مملکته @mamlekate · 572,507 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
پادچی | پادکست و کتاب صوتی @podchi · 436,830 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
تیم علمی سایکولوژی @lovoology · 147,125 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 12 August 2026
BBCPersian @bbcpersian · 778,474 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 93 here — alongside 92 others — read 8 August 2026
euronews یورونیوز @euronewspe · 149,134 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
اخبار نظامی ایران و جهان @World_Newsly · 213,609 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
سهام نیوز @sahamnewsorg · 217,407 Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“توییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها” (@uttweet), 142,017 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/uttweet.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
