10 measurements spanning 10 days, net -65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,874–16,959 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
16 Aug 2026, 02:54
16,884
-14
14 Aug 2026, 11:38
16,898
-3
13 Aug 2026, 05:14
16,901
-14
12 Aug 2026, 03:33
16,915
-8
11 Aug 2026, 01:25
16,923
-8
10 Aug 2026, 03:01
16,931
-2
8 Aug 2026, 23:55
16,933
-7
7 Aug 2026, 21:40
16,940
-7
6 Aug 2026, 21:55
16,947
-2
5 Aug 2026, 18:40
16,949
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 1 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 44s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
4,590 reactions across 19 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,983
43.2%
👍
1,155
25.2%
👎
1,005
21.9%
😡
275
5.99%
🙏
62
1.35%
🤔
58
1.26%
👌
30
0.654%
🤯
8
0.174%
🔥
7
0.153%
😱
4
0.087%
😍
3
0.065%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,590reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 7 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
16
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 19 we hold a reading for · 58%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @akbarnejad_ir. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 7 February 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
📌 امروز 158 روز از زندانی شدن استاد محمدتقی اکبرنژاد گذشت. کسی که با دلسوزی برای مردم و کشورش، هزینه نقد از حاکمیت را بر جان خرید. جای خالی ایشان و دیگر زندانیان سیاسی دلسوز، در این روزهای پرالتهاب کشور بیش از پیش دیده میشود. اما افسوس که حاکمیت، متملّقین را بر دلسوزان منتقد ترجیح میدهد.
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
📌بازنشر(این گفتگو در سال 1403 ضبط شده است)
استاد محمدتقی اکبرنژاد:
❗️۶۰ درصد عدم مشارکت به حاکمیت این پیام را داد که اگر تن به تغییر ندهد، قدم بعدی خیابان است. به هیچ وجه خشونت را تایید نمیکنم، اما جامعه بر اساس آرزوهای ما پیش نمیرود.
🎥 فیلم کامل در:
https://youtu.be/E1Yq_s_xRhQ
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
ابلاغیه جهت اجرای حکم و رفتن به زندان در سه روز آینده جهت گذراندن پنج سال حبس.تمام این ماجرا به سرعت برق و باد در فاصله دو ماه صورت گرفت.گویی با قاتلی حرفه ای روبرو هستند.در ماه های قبل هم با احضارهای مکرر و گفتگو و گرفتن توبه نامه های اجباری و ایجاد فضای حصر برای یک معلم ساده جامعه شناسی و تحت تعقیب قرار دادن های بی معنا من را از هر گونه سخن گفتن منع کرده بودند، آن هم سخنانی که حالا بعد از شش ماه تبدیل به حقیقتی مسل…
🔻امسال جشن نیمه شعبان در دفتر آیتالله بیات زنجانی برگزار نشد؛ محسن بیات زنجانی در این باره گفت: پدرم گفتند امسال چند هزار خانواده، عزیزانشان را از دست دادند
🔹به نظرم خود امام زمان هم راضی تر خواهند بود که برای همدردی با این خانوادهها امسال مراسمی برگزار نشود./جماران
@Falaakhon
🔸عنوان و لینک جلساتی از استاد اکبرنژاد که در رابطه با مهدویت و امام عصر(عج) در سالهای گذشته منتشر شده است خدمت شما مخاطبین گرامی تقدیم میشود:
1. امام زمان(عج)؛ افسانه یا واقعیت؟
2. مُنجی در عصر مدرن
3. بود و نبود امام غائبِ دائم، چه فرقی به حال ما دارد؟
4. آیا طول عمر امام زمان توجیه علمی دارد؟
5. توهّم زمینهسازی برای ظهور!
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
بیانیه استاد محمدتقی اکبرنژاد
انا لله و انا الیه راجعون
▪️اینجانب فاجعه بزرگی را که در روزهای اخیر بر ایران عزیز و ملت شریف آن وارد شد تسلیت میگویم. خصوصا به خانوادههای داغداری که خون جگرگوشههایشان کف خیابانها را رنگین کرد. از خداوند متعال برای ایشان صبر و آرامش و برای کسانی که در این فاجعه کشته شدند غفران و رحمت میطلبم، مگر کسانی که به قصد به آشوب کشاندن کشور، همسو با دشمن دست به اسلحه و آتش بردند و حسرت یک ح…
❇️ جلسات معرفتی《حیاط خلوت》
✅ اگر امام علی(ع) خلفا را غاصب میدانست، چرا نام آنان را بر فرزندانش گذاشت؟
🎥 فایل تصویری جلسه در آدرس زیر:
https://youtu.be/1N4n0_n_r_8
https://www.aparat.com/v/yzgvyms
#حیاط_خلوت
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
📌 بازنشر
⭕️چرا علماء و مراجع از حاکمیت تقیه میکنند؟!
استاد اکبرنژاد:
🔹علما و مراجع تقلید، از حاکمیت تقیه میکنند و سکوت کردهاند.
🔹وقتی علماء در روزهای بد مردم آنها را تنها میگذارند باعث فرار بیشتر مردم از دین میشوند.
🎥جهت مشاهده فیلم مصاحبه به آدرس زیر مراجعه نمایید:
https://youtu.be/mXYWQVj_ee8
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
📚معرفی اجمالی کتاب «بررسی فقهی اجتماعی لباس دین»
🔸اثر علمی از استاد اکبرنژاد(که پس از سالها هنوز اجازه نشر پیدا نکرده است)
✅ این اثر یک کار فقهی و ناظر به یک پدیده فرهنگی و اجتماعی یعنی لباس روحانیت است و میخواهد به پرسشهایی، پاسخی در خور بدهد.
❓اینکه آیا ما چیزی به نام لباس دین داریم یا این از ابداعات مسلمین است که به مرور زمان پیدا شده است؟ آیا آنچه امروز به نام «لباس روحانیت» شناخته میشود، واقعاً لباس پیغمب…
❇️ به اطلاع مخاطبین گرامی میرساند میتوانید آثار استاد اکبرنژاد را در قالب نسخه چاپی، الکترونیکی(PDF) و کتاب صوتی از طریق آدرس زیر و با دسترسی بسیار آسان تهیه نمایید:
https://AkbarNejad.com
پشتیانی سایت: @Akbarnejad2
🆔 @AkbarNejad_ir
❤42👍14👎8🙏5
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @akbarnejad_ir. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 259,218 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@akbarnejad_ir named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@akbarnejad_ir_2 named in 3 posts, 8 August 2026 – 12 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“محمدتقی اکبرنژاد” (@akbarnejad_ir), 16,884 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/akbarnejad_ir.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.