3 measurements spanning 4 days, net +21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,946–1,973 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,970
+19
8 Aug 2026, 07:12
1,951
+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:47
1,949
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.59%
avg views ÷ 1,970 subscribers
Avg views / post
189
1 post measured
Reaction rate
0.529%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 19 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 August 2026
Posts held
19 (22 October 2024 – 5 August 2026)
Views total
189
Reactions total
1
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:12 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 06m
Average length
1h 33m
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
50
43.5%
❤🔥
33
28.7%
🥰
16
13.9%
🙏
10
8.70%
👏
6
5.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سایمد برگزار میکند
دوره جدید رواندرمانی و مدیتیشنهای شرق و غرب؛ سرفصلها:
-تحلیل روانشناختی روشهای عرفانی شرقی و غربی
-علوم اعصاب، فلسفه ذهن و پدیدارشناسی بالینی برای تخصیص تمرینها و مدیریت آسیبزایی
-روانکاوی و مدیتیشن
-دستهبندی یکپارچه مدیتیشنها بر اساس تحلیل فرآیندهای زیربنایی عصب-روانشناختی
-مدیتیشنهای بدنمند و پردازش تروما
- مرور تحقیقات علمی و پروتکلهای بالینی مدیتیشن محور مانند ACT, MBSR, MBCT
…
هر برخوردی با رواندرمانی معمولاً از یک تردید بنیادین آغاز میشود: آیا رواندرمانی واقعاً مؤثر است یا این فقط یک باور رایج میان درمانگران است؟ و اگر مؤثر است، آیا همهی روشها تقریباً به یک نتیجه میرسند یا برخی واقعاً برتری دارند؟
از دل همین تردید، پرسش آشنایی مطرح میشود: آیا رابطهی درمانی همهچیز است و روش اهمیتی ندارد؟ آمارهای معروف این حیطه چقدر قابل اعتمادند؟ و آیا مفاهیمی مانند طرحواره و الگوهای ذهنی واقعیت …
علاقهمندان به حضور و اطلاع از دوره اختصاصی مدیتیشن سایمد لطفا به گروه زیر ملحق بشن؛ برای دیزاین کارآمد و نهایی محتوا، نیاز به فیدبک شرکتکنندگان داریم:
https://t.me/+XFQr5ku7at0yN2Nk
دانشآموختگان دوره اول و یکساله رواندرمانی یکپارچه سایمد، به تعدادی از داوطلبین رواندرمانی کم هزینه ارائه میدهند.
کسب اطلاعات بیشتر درباره شرایط یا درخواست ارزیابی از طریق ادمین:
@clinicpsymed
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
رواندرمانگری حرفهای؛ دوره مورد-محور اخلاق حرفهای در رواندرمانی
آمادگی برای مدیریت مراجعین پرچالش و پیشگیری از مشکلات قانونی و اخلاقی در رواندرمانی و فضای مجازی
+ مدرس: دکتر علی سلیمانی
- دکتری روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی تهران
- روانشناس بالینی دارای پروانه رسمی مستقر در استرالیا
- مبتنی بر تکست بینالمللی اخلاق رواندرمانی آکسفورد با تطبیق بر نظامنامهی اخلاق ای…
مشاهده لایو ضبط شده مصاحبه با دکتر سلیمانی در اینستاگرام سایمد:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DG5S483t2NZ/?igsh=bjcxcHQybWRxMDdh
مشاهده در تلگرام دانشگاه سایمد:
https://t.me/psymedacademy/1377
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
نشست انتقال تجربه مهاجرت و کار به عنوان روانشناسی بالینی در استرالیا
با پرسش و پاسخ
مهمان: دکتر علی سلیمانی
دکترای روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی؛ روانشناس دارای پروانه کار در استرالیا
جمعه ۱۷ اسفند ماه ساعت ۱۳ به وقت تهران
ثبت شماره موبایل برای ارسال لینک:
https://forms.gle/etcYJT1N3HoBVpp56
@psymedacademy
تسلط بر تشخیصگذاری به شیوه DSM, ICD چالشی در طی عمر حرفهای اغلب بالینگران باقی میمونه. دلیل این موضوع پراکندگی و پیچیدگی ظاهری این مدلهاست که مانع از بررسی دقیق میشه و شکافی بین دستنامه و بالین میسازه. آیا میشه به شیوه این دستنامههارو آموخت که بالینگر یک بار برای همیشه تشخیصگذاری اختلالات مختلف رو شفاف درک کنه و بتونه به کار بگیره؟
با وجود تمام کاستی های این مدلها مرسومترین شیوه محاوره و اشاره به مشکلات روانشنا…
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
دوره آنلاین ساختن DSM
تسلط بر DSM-5TR به شیوه شبکهای
سرفصلها:
تاریخ تشخیص روانپزشکی
نحوه ساخت دستنامه تشخیصی
اعتبار، ابعادیت، کاربرد بالینی
تغییرات نسخههای مختلف
تسلط بر اختلالات DSM-5TR در 5 ساعت به شیوه شبکهای (در ابتدای دوره ارائه میشود تا شرکتکنندگان آزمونها بتوانند زودتر استفاده کنند)
علامتشناسی و تشخیص افتراقی
انتقادات از DSM
شرح مفصل سایر سیستمها و روشهای تشخیصی روان
مد…
🔶 فیلم جلسه سوم از سلسله ژورنال کلابهای روانشناسی علمی
▫️برگزار شده توسط مجموعه اعصاب و روان Psymed و مجموعه Persian RFT
▪️ارائهدهنده: لیلا اکبرپور (ارشد روانشناسی شخصیت)
🔰تاریخی که ژورنال کلاب برگزار شد: ۱ آذر ۱۴۰۳
▫️برپایه مقالات: آیندهی شخصشناسانهی درمان شناختی-رفتاری: چه چیزی میان انتقادات وارده به توسعهی اکت برجسته است؟
▪️نویسندگان: استیون هیز، جوزف کیاروچی و استفان هافمن
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psymedgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد” (@psymedgroup), 1,970 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psymedgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.