Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
15 measurements spanning 52 days, net +39. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,941–2,011 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
28 Sept 2026, 06:59
1,988
-9
19 Sept 2026, 03:19
1,997
+4
15 Sept 2026, 02:18
1,993
-4
11 Sept 2026, 14:40
1,997
+2
7 Sept 2026, 06:37
1,995
-8
2 Sept 2026, 18:38
2,003
+3
30 Aug 2026, 22:39
2,000
+2
28 Aug 2026, 02:12
1,998
+18
25 Aug 2026, 01:24
1,980
+3
21 Aug 2026, 05:43
1,977
+2
17 Aug 2026, 20:44
1,975
+2
14 Aug 2026, 12:16
1,973
+3
11 Aug 2026, 13:12
1,970
+19
8 Aug 2026, 07:12
1,951
+2
7 Aug 2026, 09:47
1,949
first reading
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 22 October 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3h 06m
Average length
1h 33m
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
115 reactions across 16 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
50
43.5%
❤🔥
33
28.7%
🥰
16
13.9%
🙏
10
8.70%
👏
6
5.22%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 115 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 22 October 2024 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
سایمد برگزار میکند
دوره جدید رواندرمانی و مدیتیشنهای شرق و غرب؛ سرفصلها:
-تحلیل روانشناختی روشهای عرفانی شرقی و غربی
-علوم اعصاب، فلسفه ذهن و پدیدارشناسی بالینی برای تخصیص تمرینها و مدیریت آسیبزایی
-روانکاوی و مدیتیشن
-دستهبندی یکپارچه مدیتیشنها بر اساس تحلیل فرآیندهای زیربنایی عصب-روانشناختی
-مدیتیشنهای بدنمند و پردازش تروما
- مرور تحقیقات علمی و پروتکلهای بالینی مدیتیشن محور مانند ACT, MBSR, MBCT
…
هر برخوردی با رواندرمانی معمولاً از یک تردید بنیادین آغاز میشود: آیا رواندرمانی واقعاً مؤثر است یا این فقط یک باور رایج میان درمانگران است؟ و اگر مؤثر است، آیا همهی روشها تقریباً به یک نتیجه میرسند یا برخی واقعاً برتری دارند؟
از دل همین تردید، پرسش آشنایی مطرح میشود: آیا رابطهی درمانی همهچیز است و روش اهمیتی ندارد؟ آمارهای معروف این حیطه چقدر قابل اعتمادند؟ و آیا مفاهیمی مانند طرحواره و الگوهای ذهنی واقعیت …
علاقهمندان به حضور و اطلاع از دوره اختصاصی مدیتیشن سایمد لطفا به گروه زیر ملحق بشن؛ برای دیزاین کارآمد و نهایی محتوا، نیاز به فیدبک شرکتکنندگان داریم:
https://t.me/+XFQr5ku7at0yN2Nk
دانشآموختگان دوره اول و یکساله رواندرمانی یکپارچه سایمد، به تعدادی از داوطلبین رواندرمانی کم هزینه ارائه میدهند.
کسب اطلاعات بیشتر درباره شرایط یا درخواست ارزیابی از طریق ادمین:
@clinicpsymed
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
رواندرمانگری حرفهای؛ دوره مورد-محور اخلاق حرفهای در رواندرمانی
آمادگی برای مدیریت مراجعین پرچالش و پیشگیری از مشکلات قانونی و اخلاقی در رواندرمانی و فضای مجازی
+ مدرس: دکتر علی سلیمانی
- دکتری روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی تهران
- روانشناس بالینی دارای پروانه رسمی مستقر در استرالیا
- مبتنی بر تکست بینالمللی اخلاق رواندرمانی آکسفورد با تطبیق بر نظامنامهی اخلاق ای…
مشاهده لایو ضبط شده مصاحبه با دکتر سلیمانی در اینستاگرام سایمد:
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DG5S483t2NZ/?igsh=bjcxcHQybWRxMDdh
مشاهده در تلگرام دانشگاه سایمد:
https://t.me/psymedacademy/1377
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
نشست انتقال تجربه مهاجرت و کار به عنوان روانشناسی بالینی در استرالیا
با پرسش و پاسخ
مهمان: دکتر علی سلیمانی
دکترای روانشناسی بالینی از دانشگاه علوم پزشکی شهید بهشتی؛ روانشناس دارای پروانه کار در استرالیا
جمعه ۱۷ اسفند ماه ساعت ۱۳ به وقت تهران
ثبت شماره موبایل برای ارسال لینک:
https://forms.gle/etcYJT1N3HoBVpp56
@psymedacademy
تسلط بر تشخیصگذاری به شیوه DSM, ICD چالشی در طی عمر حرفهای اغلب بالینگران باقی میمونه. دلیل این موضوع پراکندگی و پیچیدگی ظاهری این مدلهاست که مانع از بررسی دقیق میشه و شکافی بین دستنامه و بالین میسازه. آیا میشه به شیوه این دستنامههارو آموخت که بالینگر یک بار برای همیشه تشخیصگذاری اختلالات مختلف رو شفاف درک کنه و بتونه به کار بگیره؟
با وجود تمام کاستی های این مدلها مرسومترین شیوه محاوره و اشاره به مشکلات روانشنا…
مجموعه سایمد برگزار میکند؛
دوره آنلاین ساختن DSM
تسلط بر DSM-5TR به شیوه شبکهای
سرفصلها:
تاریخ تشخیص روانپزشکی
نحوه ساخت دستنامه تشخیصی
اعتبار، ابعادیت، کاربرد بالینی
تغییرات نسخههای مختلف
تسلط بر اختلالات DSM-5TR در 5 ساعت به شیوه شبکهای (در ابتدای دوره ارائه میشود تا شرکتکنندگان آزمونها بتوانند زودتر استفاده کنند)
علامتشناسی و تشخیص افتراقی
انتقادات از DSM
شرح مفصل سایر سیستمها و روشهای تشخیصی روان
مد…
🔶 فیلم جلسه سوم از سلسله ژورنال کلابهای روانشناسی علمی
▫️برگزار شده توسط مجموعه اعصاب و روان Psymed و مجموعه Persian RFT
▪️ارائهدهنده: لیلا اکبرپور (ارشد روانشناسی شخصیت)
🔰تاریخی که ژورنال کلاب برگزار شد: ۱ آذر ۱۴۰۳
▫️برپایه مقالات: آیندهی شخصشناسانهی درمان شناختی-رفتاری: چه چیزی میان انتقادات وارده به توسعهی اکت برجسته است؟
▪️نویسندگان: استیون هیز، جوزف کیاروچی و استفان هافمن
👍2
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @psymedgroup. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
National Geographic farsi @nationalgeographicfarsi · 35,523 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 2 September 2026
کافه کتاب @CafeKetab · 57,853 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 13 September 2026
کاپلانخوانی @kaplansadockk · 37,404 Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 1 September 2026
ADHD FARSI | روانشناسی @adhdbefarsi · 22,897 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 19 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 38,077 Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
کنکور ارشد و دکتری روانشناسی (آکادمی روانتاج 👑) @RavanTajj · 22,034 Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 22 September 2026
آکادمی زبان روانشناسی @PsyEngAcademy · 21,724 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 24 September 2026
کانال اتحاد زیستشناسان ایران @UIBiologists · 29,874 Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 8 September 2026
کلوزآپ روانشناسی @Closeup_psychology · 69,868 Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 98 here — alongside 97 others — read 20 August 2026
This channel appears in 9 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 28 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“روانشناسی یکپارچه سایمد” (@psymedgroup), 1,988 subscribers as measured 28 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/psymedgroup.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.