Channel
@ensanak
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
31,308subscribers
-38 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001219748266 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ensanak |
| Description | 🌕 پادکست انسانک تأملی است در تجربیات زیسته و زندگی جاری به روایت حسام ایپکچی 💬 برای دسترسی به متن اپیزودها و درج نظرات یا پیشنهادها میتوانید به وبسایت انسانک مراجعه کنید: https://ensanak.com 🎧 لینکهای دسترسی به پادکست: http://zil.ink/ensanak |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ensanak |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 22:35 | 31,308 | +10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 20:53 | 31,298 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 31,299 | -7 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 02:01 | 31,306 | -20 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 01:11 | 31,326 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 31,329 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 31,331 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 06:19 | 31,346 | first reading |
24 posts held, back to 20 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 18 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 24 (20 June 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 86,342 |
| Reactions total | 1,079 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:06 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,899 reactions across 23 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 84.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 1,602 | 84.4% | |
| 👍 | 190 | 10.0% | |
| 👏 | 80 | 4.21% | |
| 🕊 | 15 | 0.79% | |
| 👎 | 7 | 0.369% | |
| 😢 | 2 | 0.105% | |
| 🤩 | 2 | 0.105% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.053% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 24 of the 24 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,925reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 24 most recent posts we hold, published 20 June 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @ensanak. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 24 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 June 2026 to 13 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
گاهی مشورت، بهجای مقدمهای برای عمل، به راهی برای بهتعویقانداختن آن تبدیل میشود. اگر قصد انجام کاری را داریم، جایی باید بررسی را متوقف کنیم، تصمیم بگیریم و وارد عمل شویم؛ باقیِ بررسی میتواند در حین اجرا اتفاق بیفتد. «بازنگری» ازاینجهت یک عمل فعال است: امکانِ دوباره دیدن، دوباره سنجیدن و اصلاح آنچه پیشتر بدیهی به نظر میرسید. و اگر در این بازنگری دریافتیم مسیر اشتباه است، مسیر طیشده، دلیل خوبی برای ادامهدا…
❤15👍6
روزها وزن دارند برخی سبک و برخی سنگین تنوع احوال و دگرگونی در منظره نشانهای است بر «در حرکت» بودن * میوه هر درخت از آن خود است یک روز میوهاش شیرین است و یک روز دیگر میوهاش ترش یک روز نرم است و روز دیگر در پوستهای چوبین و سخت * جاری در بستان زندگی هستیم و جاری بودن با همه سختی ترجیح دارد بر ایستایی #حسام_ایپکچی #نهانخانه @Ensanak 🌿☀️
❤98👏18🕊3👍2
اهالی انسانک سلام؛ انشای شصتوچهارم که درباره تصمیمهای بهآغازنرسیده بود، به پایان رسید. هم از آغازهایی بزرگ و سخت گفتید و هم از آغازهایی کوچک، که کلیدشان فقط به دست شماست... در این انشا، همدلیهای شما در بخش کامنتها پررنگ بود و مایه دلگرمی... ---- برگزیدههای انشای شصتوچهارم از نیمه اول و دوم کامنتها: 1⃣ محمد هیراد 2⃣ فاطمه قاسمی برایتان تصمیمهایی رشددهنده و روشن، و آغازهایی مستمر و نوشونده آرزو میک…
❤38👎3👏2
پترسن | ۲۰۱۶ چقدر به چیزهای کوچک دوروبرمان اهمیت میدهیم؟ چقدر برای لذتبردن از زندگی دنبال اتفاقهای خوبِ روزِ «بادا»ییم؟ این پایان هفته با هم فیلم پترسن را تماشا کنیم؛ داستان راننده اتوبوسی که چیزهای کوچک را دستمایه سرودن شعر میکند کارگران این فیلم جیم جارموش است و آدام درایور و گلشیفته فراهانی بازیگرهای اصلی آناند. در کامنتها درباره «مسئله اندیشیدنی» این هفته، گفتوگو کنیم، با تأکید دوباره بر اینکه از تجربه…
❤54👍13👏1
انشای شصتوچهارم این هفته در #انشائک از آغازهایی بنویسید که «مالِ شما»یند و کس دیگری نمیتواند کلید آنها را بفشارد! آیا شما تصمیمی شخصی دارید که مدتها در هزارتوی ذهنتان مانده، به آن زیاد فکر کردهاید اما به آغاز نرسیده؟ چه کار باید بکنید تا آغاز شود؟ کدام قدم را باید بردارید؟ از تجربه جزئی و شخصیتان بنویسید. در انشا دنبال مقاله علمی و توصیه برای دیگران نیستیم... 🌱 زمان ارسال انشا: پایان روز جمعه ۱۶ مرداد 🌱تعد…
❤44👎2
انشای شصتوسوم هم تمام شد. از صداها گفتید و گوش کردیم. نوشتید و خواندیم. تجربه متفاوتی بود، نه؟ کمتر پیش میآمد که در موضوعی، انشاهای آخر شبیه انشاهای اول خوانده و پسندیده شوند. اینبار اما انگار چون نوشتهها از جنس صدا بودند، بیشتر شنیده شدند تا خوانده؛ و این، رخداد جالب و تازهای بود. برگزیدههای این انشا براساس پسندهای شما از نیمه اول و دوم کامنتها: 🟡 نیمه اول 🔻 هنگامه 🟡 نیمه دوم: 🔻 محمد هیراد 🦋 برگزیده…
❤29👏6
تجربه تماشا سلام به اهالی انسانک؛ از امروز، پنجشنبۀ هر هفته یک فیلم معرفی میکنیم که نکتههایی برای اندیشیدن هم داشته باشد. این فیلمها را با هم ببینیم و دربارهشان فکر کنیم و اگر نخی از آن به تجربه زیستهمان وصل میشد، از آن تجربه برای هم در کامنتها بنویسیم؛ البته بیاینکه داستان فیلم را به دیگران لو بدهیم یا بهاصطلاح «اسپویل» کنیم این آخر هفته، فیلم جنگل کوچک را تماشا کنیم به آن فکر کنیم و درباره مسئله اندیشی…
❤114👍26👏8
https://youtu.be/RkHCxqLx3rA?is=qBXkCG6pSUfJ4vSj
❤38
شاید صدای یه پرنده، صدای زمزمه مادربزرگ، صدای جریان رود یا یه موسیقی خاص، بخشی از خاطرات ما رو بسازه و آهنگِ زمینۀ جانمون بشه... این که «کدوم صدا» چنین اثری داشته باشه، برای تکتک ما فرق داره ولی بعیده کسی با صداها مأنوس نباشه و ازشون اثر نپذیره. برای #انشائک شصتوسوم، از صداها بنویسید؛ صداهایی که شما رو شکل دادهن، و همیشه یا گاهگاه، درونتون اونها رو میشنوین؛ چه این صدا براتون خوشایند باشه و چه نادلخواه. منتظر…
❤52👍4
سهم ما از انتخاب آنقدر کم است که ارزیدنی است... اگر زیاد بود سنگ بود! چون یک ذرهست، طلاست. --- ما در میانه انبوهی از جبرها به دنیا میآییم و احتمالاً فقط در محدوده کوچکی امکان انتخاب داریم. اما کوچک بودن محدوده انتخاب به معنای کوچک بودن اثر آن نیست. گاهی یک انتخاب کوتاه، مسیری را میگشاید که سالها ادامه پیدا میکند. 🛤️✨ 📔 گوشهای از درسهای #نامدرسه #حسام_ایپکچی #انسانک @Ensanak 💎
❤137👍12👏12
هفتهای که گذشت، #انشائک میزبان نوشتههایی بود که درباره اشیا و وسایل دوستداشتنیتان نوشتید؛ همان چیزها که بخشی از شما و زندگیتان را با خود حمل میکنند. این انشاها عجیب خواندنی بودند؛ چون از صداقتی زیسته برمیآمدند. انگار خودتان را از دریچه اشیای دوروبرتان که عمری همراهتان بودهاند، خواندید... برای انشائک شصتودوم، دو برگزیده داریم، از نیمه اول و دوم کامنتها: 1⃣ محمد هیراد https://t.me/ensanak/2742?comment=282…
❤38
سوادداشتن بدون «باسواد دیدهشدن» برای شما ارزنده است؟ ثروتداشتن بدون ثروتمند دیدهشدن چطور؟ و زیبابودن بدون زیبا دیدهشدن آیا همچنان «زیبایی» محسوب میشود؟ این سؤالها را اگر در برگه امتحان مدرسه بنویسند راحت میشود به آنها پاسخ داد اما در متن زندگی و براساس تجربه زیسته هم، آیا پاسخ به این پرسشها ساده است؟ جرعه شصتوهفتم، آغاز فصل سه و البته آغاز پیاله پنجم از پادکستِ می است و سخن از ابتدای صفحه ۷۳ کتاب «درباب حک…
❤95👍13🕊2🤔1
Showing the 12 most recent of 24 posts we hold for @ensanak. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 159,576 of 1,176,251entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“| پادکست فارسی انسانک |” (@ensanak), 31,308 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ensanak.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.