Channel
@Original_psychodynamic
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
480subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002615402108 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Original_psychodynamic |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Original_psychodynamic |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:08 | 480 | -6 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:18 | 486 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 04:32 | 485 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:32 | 485 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 12 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 February 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
123 reactions across 19 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 88 | 71.5% | |
| 👍 | 23 | 18.7% | |
| 👌 | 8 | 6.50% | |
| 🙏 | 2 | 1.63% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.813% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 0.813% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 123reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 September 2025 to 8 February 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
در این روزهایی که حجم عظیمِ سوگ، خشم و درماندگیِ جمعی از آستانهی تابآوری روانمان گذشته، «بیحسی» به عنوان یک دفاع روانیِ هوشمندانه فعال شده است. این بیحسی و گسست، نه فراموشی است و نه بیتفاوتی!! سپری موقتی است برای حفظ سازمان روانی و جلوگیری از فروپاشی کامل! @original_psychodynamic اورجینال سایکوداینامیک
❤8👍2
@original_psychodynamic
❤1
گریمون هیچ...خندمون هیچ... باخته و برندمون هیچ❤️🩹...
❤5
On the wall of history, faces remain, but power does not. Dictators rise through fear and repression, and fall under a judgment that never fades. Thrones collapse, nations endure, and history reminds us: no tyranny is eternal, and the end of despotism is always inevitable. بر ديوار تاريخ، چهره ها می ماند اما قدرت نه. ديكتاتورها می آیند باترس وسركوب، و می روند باقضاوتى كه هيچگاه پاك نمی شود. تخت ها فرو مى ريزند، ملت …
❤10👏1🕊1
کمالگرایی برای هر شخصیت ( وسواسی، خودشیفته، وابسته و نمایشی) متفاوته، این مهمه که درمانگر با یه دیدِ ساده به واژه ی "کمالگرایی" نگاه نکنه، این یه کلمه هست اما برای هر کس یه دنیای متفاوت ساخته، پشتِ هر کمالگرایی یه جهانِ متفاوت پنهان هست. دنیاهای متفاوتی از نیاز به دیده شدن، تحقیر نشدن ، طرد نشدن ، که برای هر شخصیت ؛ متفاوت شکل گرفته. ترجمه و زیرنویس: اورجینال سایکوداینامیک @original_psychodynamic
👍7❤3
درمانگر به گذشته و روانِ مراجع هجوم نمیبرد؛ منتظر میماند تا ظرفیت روانی مراجع شکل بگیرد. دنیای درونی، در زمان مناسب، خود را آشکار میکند. دربِ ورود به گذشته را خودِ مراجع می گشاید، و همان مسیر می تواند مبنایی معتبر برای فهم و تبیینِ تجربهی اکنون باشد. اورجینال سایکوداینامیک @original_psychodynamic
👌8
گاهی مراجع با راهبردِ سبک دلبستگی اجتنابی تمایل دارد که درمانگر را مانندِ بخشی از ideal self یا خودِ ایده آل تجربه کند، همچون درمانگرِ ایده آلی که قرار نیست مراجع را ناکام کند. اما در مسیر درمان، یک حقیقت مهم آشکار میشود: درمانگر قرار نیست ایدهآل باشد و پذیرش این محدودیت ، ناکامی و سوگواری ؛ هم برای مراجع و هم برای درمانگر بخشی از روند درمان است. این ناکامیِ آرام و تدریجی، گاهاً می تواند زمینه ی شکلگیری رابطهای …
👍5❤3
هشت باور اشتباه درمورد رواندرمانی از دکتر جاناتان شدلر به نقل از دکتر گلن گابارد : ۱) درمانگر باید تا حد زیادی سکوت کند.❌ ۱) درمانگر باید در مواقع مناسب سکوت کند.✅ ۲)درمانگر باید مثل یک لوح سپید با چهره ای بی احساس و خنثی باشد.❌ ۲)بیاحساسی باعث فاصله گرفتن مراجع میشود و حس امنیت و اعتماد ایجاد نمیکند ، مراجع نیاز دارد احساسات درمانگر را درک کند تا بتواند به بیان احساسات خودش اعتماد کند.✅ ۳)درمانگر نباید هیچ نظر…
❤3
Photo, posted without a caption
نادیدهگرفتن اهداف و تکالیف درمان و تمرکز صرف بر کیفیت رابطهی درمانی، میتواند روند درمان را با چالش هایی مواجه کند. نیاز است که تعیین هدف درمانی بهصورت مشترک میان درمانگر و مراجع شکل بگیرد؛ صرفِ وجود آن در ذهن درمانگر کافی نیست. پس از گذشت چندین جلسه، ممکن است روشن شود که هدف مشترکی شکل نگرفته ، لازم است در همان ابتدای مسیر، دربارهی اینکه مسئلهی اصلی مراجع چیست به توافق برسیم؛ در غیر اینصورت، مراجع مشکل را پی…
❤2🙏2
Video, posted without a caption
❤4
چند نفر از دوستان در دایرکت ؛ راجع به ترجمه ی درستِ این قسمت از متن پرسیده بودن، توضیحات رو براتون داخل یه کلیپ پنج دقیقه ای پُر کردم. اگه دوست داشتین میتونین ببینین @Original_psychodynamic
❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Original_psychodynamic. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 310,982 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Original Psychodynamic| اورجینال سایکوداینامیک” (@Original_psychodynamic), 480 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Original_psychodynamic.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.