Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
27 measurements spanning 96 days, net +166. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,859–9,075 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Nov 2026, 08:18
9,050
+7
6 Nov 2026, 14:01
9,043
-2
3 Nov 2026, 11:29
9,045
+6
31 Oct 2026, 05:28
9,039
+18
28 Oct 2026, 03:37
9,021
+6
24 Oct 2026, 20:40
9,015
+2
21 Oct 2026, 10:57
9,013
-1
18 Oct 2026, 14:55
9,014
+17
15 Oct 2026, 09:44
8,997
-6
12 Oct 2026, 03:20
9,003
+25
5 Oct 2026, 01:20
8,978
+23
25 Sept 2026, 17:41
8,955
+40
17 Sept 2026, 13:19
8,915
+1
13 Sept 2026, 04:00
8,914
+1
9 Sept 2026, 09:36
8,913
+4
3 Sept 2026, 21:19
8,909
+14
31 Aug 2026, 07:38
8,895
+6
28 Aug 2026, 17:46
8,889
-1
25 Aug 2026, 09:03
8,890
+4
22 Aug 2026, 11:03
8,886
first reading
Engagement
140 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 50 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
8.03%
avg views ÷ 9,050 subscribers
Avg views / post
727
43 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.73%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
43
of 140 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 41 of 43 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026
Posts held
140 (26 July 2026 – 12 November 2026)
Views total
31,257
Reactions total
520
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
13 Nov 2026, 00:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈3,290
Videos
≈300
Links
≈3,000
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
1,836 reactions across 134 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 72.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
1,332
72.5%
🔥
182
9.91%
👍
150
8.17%
👏
62
3.38%
🤔
45
2.45%
🙏
31
1.69%
💯
13
0.708%
👌
11
0.599%
🥰
10
0.545%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 134 of the 140 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,836 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 140 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 26 of 43 posts held from the last 30 days (60.5%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
به باورِ مهرپرستان، هیچگونه تضاد بنیادینی میان خیر و شر وجود ندارد. در فصل پنجم استدلال میشود که میثره (مهر)، که به عنوان قهرمان و نجاتبخش بشریت شناخته میشود، میانجیای دادگر و بیطرف در نبرد کیهانی میان نیروهای متقابلِ اورمزد (اهورا مزدا) و اهریمن است. افزون بر این، اهریمن و اورمزد دوقلوهایی هستند که از مادری زاده شدهاند که در عین حال پدرِ آنان نیز محسوب میشود؛ ایزدی دوسویه و دوجنسیتی به نام «زوروان» که بعدها …
نگاه به زرتشت به عنوانِ نخستین صدا در یک گفتمانِ فلسفی—که در نهایت ذخایرِ درخشانی چون فیثاغورس و هراکلیتوس را در بر میگیرد—همچنین به معنایِ پذیرشِ این حقیقت است که زرتشت نیز خطاپذیر بوده است. در حالی که فیثاغورس و هراکلیتوس هر دو پیوندهای بسیار تنگاتنگی با ایرانِ امپراتوری داشتند—اولی دوازده سال در پایتختِ آن به تحصیل پرداخت و دومی از سوی داریوش دعوت شد تا به عنوان فیلسوفِ دربارِ او خدمت کند—این متفکرانِ یونانی زرتش…
. فصلِ نخستِ این پژوهش همچنین واکاوی میکند که چگونه این سنخ از معنویت—که در آن قربانیهای هولناک، مدهوشیِ آیینی ، آزمونهای آتش، شمشیرِ مقدس، جامِ مقدس و بانوی دریاچه نقشهای بنیادینی ایفا میکردند—به دستِ سکاها، سرمتیها و آلانها از «ایرانِ قفقازی» به درونِ اروپا انتقال یافت. در همین حال، این سنت در فلاتِ ایران در قالبِ سنتِ ریشهدارِ «جوانمردی» یا «پهلوانی»—یعنی فرهنگِ شوالیه گری قهرمانانِ دلاور—استمرار و بقا …
یکی از دلایل اصلی موفقیت اسپانیاییها در غارت و فتح این تمدنها این بود که کاهنان بومی، بر اساس ظاهر اسپانیاییها و فناوری «جادویی» آنها، مردانی مانند کورتس و همرزمانش را با خدایان تمدنآفرینی که وعده داده بودند پس از فرار با «قایقهای بدون پارو» بازگردند، اشتباه گرفتند. رویارویی بزرگی میان «مار پردار» کوئتزالکواتل یا ووتان، و شخصیتی به نام تسکاتلیپوکا ، ارباب «آینه دودکننده» رخ داد. اولی ایزدی نیکوکار و تمدنآفرین…
آیا جرج اسمیت لوح دیگری هم غیر از الواح حماسه گیلگمش ترجمه کرده بود که جنجال برانگیز باشد ؟
بله
ترجمه این لوح به حدی تکان دهنده بود که هرگز منتشر نشد .
لوحی که خبر از یک زمین دیگر می دهد و پلی که بین این دو جهان ساخته شده و در زمان های خاصی باز و بسته می شود .
چهار آنوناکی در آگاه کردن یک سری انسانهای برگزیده از این پل نقش داشته اند :
انکی
نین هارساگ
نین گیش زیدا
و نفر چهارمی که معمار پل هست ...
در کانال ویژه کتاب گ…
تاریخی ماندگار
برای بیش از دو هزار و پانصد سال، قومیت و زبان ایرانی، هسته بنیادین هویت تمدن ایران را شکل دادهاند. این حقیقت از دید تمامی دولتهای اروپایی که بهعنوان رقیب با امپراتوری ایران مواجه شدند—از روزگار یونانیان کلاسیک گرفته تا رومیان پاگان، بیزانسیها، بریتانیاییها، فرانسویها و روسها—پنهان نماند. تمامی آنان، بدون استثنا، سراسر ایران و گستره تمدنی آن را همواره «پرشیا» یا «امپراتوری پرشیا» نامیدهاند. فرید…
به نظر میرسد مدت کوتاهی پس از شکلگیری تمدنی در مریخ (که از دیدگاه ما در ماقبل تاریخ بسیار دورِ بشری قرار میگیرد)، اوضاع بهشدت خراب شد و نهتنها این تمدن، بلکه زیستکره مریخ نیز نابود گردید. شواهد حاصل از دور بینی اطلاعات مرکزی آمریکا( سیا) نشان میدهد که «مریخیها» در آن زمان هیچ چاره دیگری جز پناه بردن به زمینِ نخستین نداشتند. با این حال، این اتفاق در دورانی پیش از پیدایش ماه رخ داد؛ زمانی که زیستکره اولیه سیار…
فهرست مطالب
1- قارهی آتلانتیس
قارههای در حال حرکت
2- تاریخ آتلانتیس
اولین تمدنها
سرآغاز تفکر
3- فناوری اتری: قدرتهای «جادویی» آتلانتیسیها
فناوری اتری
دوران افول جادوگران
4- پیامآوران الهی
5- دانش سرّی آتلانتیس: خیانت و سرنوشت متعاقب آن
منشاء اسرار
6. بررسی پایانی: آتلانتیس و تکامل معنوی
فهرست منابع
پیشنهاد جهت مطالعهی بیشتر
یادداشتی دربارهی سخنرانیهای رودولف اشتاینر
@Buyingbook
کتاب گمشده ابتدا یه وبلاگ بود بعد یه صفحه در فیس بوک شد بعد کانالی در تلگرام و الان بعد از بیش از دو دهه سایتی هم به همین نام راه اندازی شده .الهام بخش بسیاری بودیم. راه درازی پیموده شده تا اینجا و دوستان بسیاری به شیوه های مختلف کمک کردند تا سرپا بمونیم که سپاسگذار همه هستیم . برای تداوم و دوام و بقا همچنان به کمک های شما عزیزان نیازمندیم و امیدوارم بتوانیم در آینده آثار برجسته تری را تقدیم شما کنیم
با تشکر .🙏
6104-…
❤12🤔4👏2🙏1
Signed Mehr01
Showing the 12 most recent of 140 posts we hold for @thelostbook. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@thelostbook edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
24 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 November 2026
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
دنياى گمشده @lostworldss · 33,380 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 4 September 2026
دنیای ناشناخته @wonderfullllll · 36,175 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 2 September 2026
کتب @cotob · 59,290 Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 22 August 2026
📚 من و کتاب 📚 @aramesh13577 · 26,587 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
اسرار ممنوعه با آرمین @Forbidden_Mysteries · 23,175 Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 19 September 2026
برترین کتابها @bartarinbookk · 33,249 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 5 September 2026
انبارستان🎧 @anbar100 · 29,863 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 9 September 2026
Spirit_and_life_ | روانشناسی تحلیلی یونگ @Spirit_and_life · 40,558 Telegram ranks this channel #56 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 1 September 2026
جهانهای موازی™ @Parallel_WORLDS · 30,433 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 6 September 2026
⚖️ DNA_Pluse⚖️ @dnapluse · 29,874 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 9 September 2026
روانشناسی (پذیرش) @PAZIRESH_LIFE · 35,652 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 1 September 2026
آنتی ایلومیناتی @antiluminati · 33,495 Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 5 September 2026
This channel appears in 12 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کتاب گمشده” (@thelostbook), 9,050 subscribers as measured 10 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/thelostbook.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.