Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
8 measurements spanning 6 days, net -969. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 211,657–212,916 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 09:44
211,802
-85
11 Aug 2026, 09:14
211,887
-248
10 Aug 2026, 09:21
212,135
-146
9 Aug 2026, 09:52
212,281
-112
8 Aug 2026, 12:32
212,393
-232
7 Aug 2026, 12:43
212,625
-146
6 Aug 2026, 10:00
212,771
no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:45
212,771
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 28 October 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,000
Videos
≈896
Links
≈1,640
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
8m 40s
Average length
1m 44s
Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
6,558 reactions across 20 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤯
1,354
20.6%
👍
1,125
17.2%
👏
1,056
16.1%
❤
989
15.1%
🔥
895
13.6%
💯
595
9.07%
😨
142
2.17%
🫡
134
2.04%
⚡
85
1.30%
👌
67
1.02%
💊
59
0.9%
🆒
38
0.579%
🏆
19
0.29%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,558reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 28 October 2025 to 10 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
116
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
102
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @project_veritas. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 October 2025 to 10 March 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Stanford Law School is now using our case, Project Veritas v. Vasquez, to train its top students - debating Oregon's unconstitutional ban on undercover journalism in a mock trial.
The team arguing Project Veritas' First Amendment position won the finals.
The competition's focus on this real-world case underscores the ongoing national importance of defending the right to record wrongdoing and expose corruption.
htt…
The tide is finally turning against the transgender attack on children.
Project Veritas was among the FIRST to expose this insidious industry - undercover videos showing doctors pushing puberty blockers on 8 year olds, secret transitions without parental consent, & more...
MORE: https://www.projectveritas.com/news/too-young-veritas-exposes-the-transgender-health-industry
Unlikely alliance of the year:
Trump calls out Pelosi’s insider trading in the State of the Union…
David Hogg drops the same truth on Veritas hidden camera.
WATCH. 👀
🚨Over the years, we've exposed radical leftists who view their fight as do-or-die: Willing to let cities burn, break laws, or see blood spilled for the 'cause.'
In this 2020 undercover investigation, Bernie Sanders field organizer Kyle Jurek confessed:
- Conservatives belong in GULAGS for 're-education'
- Trump supporters are 'f***ing Nazis' needing forced lessons via 'free education.'
- If things don't go their …
But the battle is far from over.
As long as corruption exists in our institutions, Project Veritas will be there to expose it.
Join us by making an IMPACT for 2026 NOW: https://www.projectveritas.com/donate
Project Veritas has been at the forefront of the most groundbreaking investigative stories of 2025, including:
Foiled Orlando Terror Plot
EPA Corruption Exposed
Leticia James Mortgage Fraud Investigation
DNC Exposed
Election Integrity
Protecting Kids
Complete Victory: Project Veritas triumphed over the DOJ’s years-long, unconstitutional targeting of our newsroom regarding Ashley Biden’s diary, with no charges …
🚨BREAKING: Threatening texts from number linked to Armstrong Williams corroborate Project Veritas' report on the targeting of Candace Owens:
“Barr is already running out of patience… take a good hard look at what happened to (Charlie)Kirk and maybe you’ll think twice.”
Leaked messages published on Project Veritas have ignited a storm around Candace Owens, after claims that the daughter of a former senior Department of Justice official discussed plans to blackmail her.
MORE TO COME.
https://www.ibtimes.co.uk/candace-owens-blackmail-doj-officials-daughter-allegedly-planned-underage-trap-1758562
🤯188👏54🔥34❤12💊9💯8👍4🫡3
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @project_veritas. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 45,435 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII · 171,140 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Donald Trump Jr @TrumpJr · 366,891 Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 10 August 2026
Donald J. Trump @real_donaldjtrump · 605,821 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 10 August 2026
Charlie Kirk @CharlieKirk · 156,047 Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 12 August 2026
General Flynn ️ @RealGenFlynn · 152,630 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 12 August 2026
One America News Network @OANNTV · 148,331 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 12 August 2026
X22 Report Official @realx22report · 164,170 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 12 August 2026
Disclose.tv @disclosetv · 328,133 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project Veritas” (@project_veritas), 211,802 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/project_veritas.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
