Neka visi Pedro: je li Fauci pandemijski Pedro? Kad sustav zakaže, treba mu krivac s imenom i licem — jedan, da svi ostali mogu mirno spavati. Fauci je savršen Pedro: objesiš njega i amnestiraš sve druge — korporacije, institucije, politiku i profitere koji su se obogatili, a danas ih ne prozivaju nego ugošćuju. Ono što članak donosi, potkrijepljeno izvorima: — zašto je „svi su lagali" točnije od „Fauci je lagao"; — …

Channel
KANAL INICIJATIVE HIPOKRAT
@kanalhipokrat
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,505subscribers
-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001640477294 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @kanalhipokrat |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/kanalhipokrat |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,505 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:04 | 1,507 | -2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:12 | 1,509 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:32 | 1,513 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:16 | 1,513 | first reading |
Engagement
21 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 12.9%
- avg views ÷ 1,505 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 194
- 21 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 21
- of 21 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (21 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,064 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3h 34m
- Average length
- 26m 46s
Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
"Veliko buđenje"
"Inside vaccine trials"
EUROPA JE OVO ČULA. I NIJE SLUŠALA. O imigraciji se kod nas počelo ozbiljno govoriti tek kad je postala vidljiva na ulici. U „Slobodnima" o njoj govorimo godinama — s ljudima iz jedanaest različitih zemalja i struka. Izvukli smo ih iz arhive i složili na jedno mjesto: 🔹 Sakari Linden (#113): „Švedska državna željeznica dovela je golem broj tražitelja azila na finsku granicu — a finski vojnici došli su da ih nose n…
[Masovnomigrantski eksperiment kao dio šireg posthumanističkog projekta]: https://sapereaudecro.substack.com/p/masovnomigrantski-eksperiment-kao https://www.facebook.com/share/p/191aXgMtzM/
FAUCI JE PRED SENATOM ZAŠUTIO. SEDMERO NAŠIH GOSTIJU NIJE. Na saslušanju 29. srpnja Anthony Fauci se više od stotinu puta pozvao na Peti amandman. Pitanja su se odnosila na njegove mailove, osobni dnevnik i dokumente iz vremena pandemije. Vratili smo se u arhivu „Slobodnih" — sedam razgovora koji danas zvuče aktualnije nego ikad: 🔹 Sasha Latypova (#109): „Radilo se o koordiniranom vojnom napadu na stanovništvo, a …
https://t.me/Edward_Dowd/3586 To nije bio samo loš dan za Tonyja Faucija. Bio je to loš dan za sve plašljive medijske majstore koji su pojačali njegovo lažiranje i napuhali njegov ugled. Bio je to loš dan za sve akademske znanstvenike koji su šutjeli iz straha od gubitka stipendija. Bio je to užasan dan za sve liberalne, konzervativne i slobodarske intelektualce i organizacije koji su šutjeli dok su narodne slobode …
The Business of Wildfires https://youtube.com/shorts/A10CuLbxxn0?si=_8jJ-TWVxFiyTaS9
Saslušanje Faucija u Senatu (Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) 29.7.2026.
https://dijalog.hr/vjera-i-duhovnost/sto-vise-pokusavaju-usutkati-majku-to-glasnije-odjekuje-njezino-ime/93190/
https://t.me/DrBines_verbales_Vitriol/21115 Glavni kirurg Floride, dr. Joseph Ladapo, kaže da je jedan od najvećih koraka prema poboljšanju sigurnosti cjepiva jednostavno davanje ljudima informacija koje im nikada nisu rečene. „Jedan od najvažnijih dijelova ovog pokreta... je jednostavno davanje informacija koje ljudi ne znaju.“ „Ova cjepiva protiv hepatitisa B koja su odobrena za dojenčad temeljila su se na po…
Ekskluzivni izvještaj s lica mjesta; https://dijalog.hr/vijesti/miletic-s-mostovcima-izveo-desant-na-ogradenu-plazu-ispred-hiltona/92893
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kanalhipokrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 735,758 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@kanalhipokrat named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“KANAL INICIJATIVE HIPOKRAT” (@kanalhipokrat), 1,505 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanalhipokrat.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.