Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for KANAL INICIJATIVE HIPOKRAT

Channel

KANAL INICIJATIVE HIPOKRAT

@kanalhipokrat

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

1,505subscribers

-8 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001640477294
TypeChannel
Username@kanalhipokrat
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/kanalhipokrat

Growth

1,5051,5131,5097 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,513 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,509 subscribers14 August 2026 — 1,507 subscribers17 August 2026 — 1,505 subscribers7 August 202617 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 10 days, net -8. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,504–1,514 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 12:381,505-2
14 Aug 2026, 01:041,507-2
10 Aug 2026, 13:121,509-4
7 Aug 2026, 20:321,513no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:161,513first reading

Engagement

21 posts held, back to 21 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.9%
avg views ÷ 1,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
194
21 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
21
of 21 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held21 (21 July 20267 August 2026)
Views total4,064
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:11 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3h 34m
Average length
26m 46s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 14:14 UTC50 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Neka visi Pedro: je li Fauci pandemijski Pedro? Kad sustav zakaže, treba mu krivac s imenom i licem — jedan, da svi ostali mogu mirno spavati. Fauci je savršen Pedro: objesiš njega i amnestiraš sve druge — korporacije, institucije, politiku i profitere koji su se obogatili, a danas ih ne prozivaju nego ugošćuju. Ono što članak donosi, potkrijepljeno izvorima: — zašto je „svi su lagali" točnije od „Fauci je lagao"; —

31 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC281 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

EUROPA JE OVO ČULA. I NIJE SLUŠALA. O imigraciji se kod nas počelo ozbiljno govoriti tek kad je postala vidljiva na ulici. U „Slobodnima" o njoj govorimo godinama — s ljudima iz jedanaest različitih zemalja i struka. Izvukli smo ih iz arhive i složili na jedno mjesto: 🔹 Sakari Linden (#113): „Švedska državna željeznica dovela je golem broj tražitelja azila na finsku granicu — a finski vojnici došli su da ih nose n

31 Jul 2026, 19:57 UTC161 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SapereAudeCro

[Masovnomigrantski eksperiment kao dio šireg posthumanističkog projekta]: https://sapereaudecro.substack.com/p/masovnomigrantski-eksperiment-kao https://www.facebook.com/share/p/191aXgMtzM/

31 Jul 2026, 19:56 UTC187 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

FAUCI JE PRED SENATOM ZAŠUTIO. SEDMERO NAŠIH GOSTIJU NIJE. Na saslušanju 29. srpnja Anthony Fauci se više od stotinu puta pozvao na Peti amandman. Pitanja su se odnosila na njegove mailove, osobni dnevnik i dokumente iz vremena pandemije. Vratili smo se u arhivu „Slobodnih" — sedam razgovora koji danas zvuče aktualnije nego ikad: 🔹 Sasha Latypova (#109): „Radilo se o koordiniranom vojnom napadu na stanovništvo, a

30 Jul 2026, 19:29 UTC174 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/Edward_Dowd/3586 To nije bio samo loš dan za Tonyja Faucija. Bio je to loš dan za sve plašljive medijske majstore koji su pojačali njegovo lažiranje i napuhali njegov ugled. Bio je to loš dan za sve akademske znanstvenike koji su šutjeli iz straha od gubitka stipendija. Bio je to užasan dan za sve liberalne, konzervativne i slobodarske intelektualce i organizacije koji su šutjeli dok su narodne slobode

30 Jul 2026, 19:25 UTC228 viewsread 7 August 2026

The Business of Wildfires https://youtube.com/shorts/A10CuLbxxn0?si=_8jJ-TWVxFiyTaS9

30 Jul 2026, 19:22 UTC179 viewsread 7 August 2026
Video

Saslušanje Faucija u Senatu (Senate Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs) 29.7.2026.

29 Jul 2026, 06:36 UTC220 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://dijalog.hr/vjera-i-duhovnost/sto-vise-pokusavaju-usutkati-majku-to-glasnije-odjekuje-njezino-ime/93190/

27 Jul 2026, 05:47 UTC267 viewsread 7 August 2026

https://t.me/DrBines_verbales_Vitriol/21115 Glavni kirurg Floride, dr. Joseph Ladapo, kaže da je jedan od najvećih koraka prema poboljšanju sigurnosti cjepiva jednostavno davanje ljudima informacija koje im nikada nisu rečene. „Jedan od najvažnijih dijelova ovog pokreta... je jednostavno davanje informacija koje ljudi ne znaju.“ „Ova cjepiva protiv hepatitisa B koja su odobrena za dojenčad temeljila su se na po

27 Jul 2026, 05:41 UTC207 viewsread 7 August 2026

Ekskluzivni izvještaj s lica mjesta; https://dijalog.hr/vijesti/miletic-s-mostovcima-izveo-desant-na-ogradenu-plazu-ispred-hiltona/92893

Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @kanalhipokrat. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 735,758 of 1,507,151entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“KANAL INICIJATIVE HIPOKRAT” (@kanalhipokrat), 1,505 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/kanalhipokrat.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.