Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤6👍1

Channel
@JDVance_VicePresident
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
168subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001520075293 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @JDVance_VicePresident |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 11 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 11 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/JDVance_VicePresident |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 25 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 168 | -1 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 11:25 | 169 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 15:32 | 168 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:28 | 168 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 18 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
91 reactions across 20 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 43 | 47.3% | |
| ❤ | 28 | 30.8% | |
| 🙏 | 9 | 9.89% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 6.59% | |
| 👌 | 2 | 2.20% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 1.10% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 1.10% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 91 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 20 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤6👍1
If you want to help a normal person, don't provide a corporation nine low wage migrants to compete against them...You actually give workers more power when you have a more restrictive immigration policy. Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
💯2
JD Vance Lindsey Graham came from humble beginnings and became one of the most powerful lawmakers in the most powerful nation on Earth. His story was a fundamentally American one. Early in my Senate tenure, I remember getting into a shouting match with Lindsey about a Ukraine funding bill at lunch and then learning the very next day that he was pushing rail legislation I really cared about behind the scenes. That w…
👍8🙏2
Today and every day, we are proud of our American heritage. Here’s to the next 250 years of American greatness🇺🇸 Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤3
When people say 'you can't ever do immigration enforcement if it produces a bad video clip,' what they're really saying is 'you can't ever actually do immigration enforcement.' We had 12M people come into the country [under Biden] — and we were elected with a mandate to get some of those people OUT. Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
👍6❤2
Yesterday was a very, very good day. We made a lot of good progress. The Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a major milestone for the American people and the first step in permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran. Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
👍5❤2
What's brought us to this moment is @POTUS' leadership, and @POTUS' willingness to see a Middle East that is much different 10 years from now than it was 10 years ago. Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤3
This is probably what we're most excited as Americas — the Iranians have agreed to invite IAEA inspectors back into their country. That is a MAJOR milestone for the American people. And the first step in permanently denuclearizing or permanently ending a nuclear weapons program in Iran. And that's exactly what we wanted to do. That's exactly what we asked to happen. We made a lot of great progress on other nuclear …
🙏4👎1
To Christians in Lebanon, keep your faith in Jesus Christ and know you have friends in the U.S. govt who are trying to promote peace… Christians face such violence because you have Hezbollah — that has taken up shop in Lebanon. Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
👍3🙏3
Just two days ago, I spent over an hour on The View, so I actually have great experience in very hostile negotiations Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤1
Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
❤1
"No, not at all. I think the President was joking, as he often does" 🤣 Subscribe for more: @JDVance_VicePresident
👍3❤1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @JDVance_VicePresident. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Vice President JD Vance 🇺🇸” (@JDVance_VicePresident), 168 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/JDVance_VicePresident.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.