Channel
@covidvaccineadversereactions
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
6,055subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001471208744 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @covidvaccineadversereactions |
| Created | 24 May 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 25 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 25 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/covidvaccineadversereactions |
Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 25 Sept 2026, 05:41 | 6,055 | -14 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 06:15 | 6,069 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 21:21 | 6,080 | -17 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 11:59 | 6,097 | -6 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 00:37 | 6,103 | +1 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 07:05 | 6,102 | +1 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 6,101 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 09:23 | 6,106 | -1 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 12:56 | 6,107 | +3 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 01:52 | 6,104 | +1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 04:29 | 6,103 | +4 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 00:14 | 6,099 | +6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:23 | 6,093 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:31 | 6,087 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 6,087 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 14 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
216 reactions across 15 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 💯 | 45 | 20.8% | |
| 👍 | 30 | 13.9% | |
| 👏 | 26 | 12.0% | |
| 👌 | 16 | 7.41% | |
| 🤬 | 16 | 7.41% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 6.94% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 6.48% | |
| 🙏 | 12 | 5.56% | |
| 😡 | 9 | 4.17% | |
| 🥱 | 8 | 3.70% | |
| 🤡 | 6 | 2.78% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 2.31% | |
| 😈 | 5 | 2.31% | |
| 💩 | 3 | 1.39% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 1.39% | |
| ⚡ | 1 | 0.463% | |
| 🖕 | 1 | 0.463% | |
| 🤮 | 1 | 0.463% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 216 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Young Man Cuts Through the Corruption With Sharp Analysis of Forced Childhood Vaccination Policies Once you see it, you can never unsee it... “So let me get this straight. It's illegal to not send your child to school, but it's also illegal to send your child to school if they have not received injections of pharmaceutical products. Because of this, 98% of children have received injections of pharmaceutical product…
💯14👏6❤1🔥1
A Defacto Depopulation Event Has Been Occurring and 80% of Humanity is Too Sheep Like To Enable Criminal Charges NEW: Former BlackRock fund manager Ed Dowd on the Covid jabs as a depopulation tool: "I wasn't in the room, so I don't know... but a de facto depopulation is occurring as we speak. Excess deaths continue to this day, and birth rates are declining" "regardless of whether or not there was a plan, it's hap…
👍6👌4
The Most Trusted Standards For Non Biased Science Have Ignored for Decades the Most Insidious Bias of All "Most published research findings are false." Say that out loud in a hospital and you'd get laughed out of the room. That's the actual title of a paper by John Ioannidis at Stanford, whom Dr. Aseem Malhotra calls the most cited medical researcher alive. The greater the financial interest in a field, the less l…
💯5👌2
Fauci Falsely Discredit Ivermectin So they Could Experimentally "Vaccinate" Everyone The ONLY way our government could inject the entire population with experimental gene therapies was to FRAUDULENTLY claim ivermectin didn’t work. We now have 106 studies involving 200,000+ patients showing ivermectin: CUT mortality by 47% CUT hospitalizations by 34% CUT infections by 79% BOOSTED viral clearance by 44% IMPROVED rec…
❤3👌3💩3🤬1🤮1
Aaron Rodgers Slams Vaccine Circus Under Directed by Former NIH Director Anthony Fauci MCAFEE: “You have a lot of teammates that are vaccinated… heading into the season.” RODGERS: “A lot of people had probably FAKE vax cards back in the day too.” McAFEE: “Not me!” RODGERS: “I remember seeing some of the vax cards. It was like written in CRAYON.” “I’m like, all right, so we’re going to pass that up, but we [unvax…
😁5👏3❤2👍2
Bill Gates Depopulation Agenda Continues to Be Exposed to the World Without Any Real Accountability For His Actions DEPOPULATION operations were launched in 2021, when over 70% of the global population was forced or coerced into taking the fertility-damaging COVID-19 “vaccines” that Bill Gates spent over $100 MILLION funding. These plans were revealed 16 years ago in a 2010 TED Talk, where Bill Gates stated his des…
🤬8😨3🙏1
Moderna Patented the Furin Cleavage Site in 2016 That Had a 1 in 31 Billion Chance of Matching the Covid Coronavirus How is this not the smoking gun? John Leake highlights the fact the SARS -COV-2 furin cleavage cite had been patented by Moderna in 2016. They then partnered with Fauci/ NIAID to create their COVID vaccine. The chances of this happening naturally . One in thirty one billion!! One of the main issu…
🔥7👏5🙏2
Join us👇 @CovidVaccineAdverseReactions
👍11🔥7👌2
Stephen A. Smith Publicly APOLOGIZES to Kyrie Irving after Calling Him "Selfish" for Refusing the COVID jab "Hindsight-wise, it didn’t make him stubborn or selfish. It made him BRAVE." "I watched Dr. Fauci on Capitol Hill yesterday, and the person I thought about most was Kyrie Irving." “Kyrie Irving stood out in my mind because of the heat that he was taking... He refused the vaccine. New York City's mandate made…
👍10👏7❤3
The Dark Side of a Dark Little Man Jeffrey Tucker, Professor of Brownstone Institute. has read through "the Fauci Diaries" which is not a diary at all. RFk tells how they got a hold of the Fauci files and it was from communications that Fauci sent to himself on government servers. Jeffrey Tucker wasn't prepared for the side of darkness he saw in Fauci that he saw in the files. Pharmaceutical companies historically…
💯6🙏2👍1
Fauci Worked to Suppress Ivermectin as a Potential Treatment for Covid at All Cost Fauci FRAUDULENTLY claimed ivermectin didn’t work so the government could inject the entire population with emergency-use-authorized gene therapies. No need to cherry pick studies based on one's own bias which is why meta studies are considered the crème of the crop, a higher form of evidence than even a RCT. The meta data gathered …
🤬7👏2🙏2⚡1
24% of the 39,000 deaths Reported to Vaers Occurred 1 to 2 DaysAfter the Covid "Vaccine" Senator Informs Fauci A Senator, Ron Johnson, tells Fauci in the hearing today where Fauci pleads the 5th amendment, that he followed the VAER reports even though it wasn't his job. He asked Fauci if he followed them but fauci would not answer. Sen Ron Johnson then blasts the push against "misinformation" led by Fauci against…
👌5💯5😡4❤2🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @covidvaccineadversereactions. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 12 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 7 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Covid Vaccine Adverse Reactions” (@covidvaccineadversereactions), 6,055 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/covidvaccineadversereactions.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.