Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 66% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
64 measurements spanning 97 days, net -959. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 42,113–43,360 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 64
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
11 Nov 2026, 17:59
42,257
-14
9 Nov 2026, 21:36
42,271
-16
8 Nov 2026, 13:58
42,287
-8
7 Nov 2026, 07:09
42,295
-11
6 Nov 2026, 09:47
42,306
-5
5 Nov 2026, 11:27
42,311
-4
4 Nov 2026, 14:44
42,315
-4
3 Nov 2026, 16:16
42,319
-16
2 Nov 2026, 17:31
42,335
-9
1 Nov 2026, 14:37
42,344
-14
31 Oct 2026, 13:06
42,358
-6
29 Oct 2026, 17:39
42,364
-8
28 Oct 2026, 17:48
42,372
-12
27 Oct 2026, 19:41
42,384
-14
26 Oct 2026, 18:17
42,398
-10
25 Oct 2026, 16:20
42,408
-11
24 Oct 2026, 16:16
42,419
-21
23 Oct 2026, 17:57
42,440
-14
22 Oct 2026, 19:21
42,454
-10
21 Oct 2026, 14:16
42,464
first reading
Engagement
43 posts held, back to 28 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 193 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
24.8%
avg views ÷ 42,257 subscribers
Avg views / post
10,500
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 43 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026
Posts held
43 (28 April 2026 – 9 November 2026)
Views total
73,430
Reactions total
1,342
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
14 Nov 2026, 09:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈120
Videos
≈854
Links
≈20,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
56m 27s
Average length
1m 37s
Measured directly from 35 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
10,634 reactions across 43 posts, in 49 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
3,517
33.1%
❤
3,033
28.5%
💯
2,172
20.4%
🔥
361
3.39%
👏
354
3.33%
🤡
246
2.31%
🤮
96
0.903%
🙏
93
0.875%
💔
88
0.828%
🤔
85
0.799%
😁
60
0.564%
👌
53
0.498%
😱
42
0.395%
❤🔥
37
0.348%
😈
34
0.32%
😢
34
0.32%
🤬
34
0.32%
🕊
30
0.282%
🥰
30
0.282%
🏆
28
0.263%
29 further kinds
207
1.95%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 43 of the 43 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,634 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 43 most recent posts we hold, published 28 April 2026 to 9 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 7 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
On Chin-wag this week, David and Jaymie give their insight into the midterm election results in America. Alex Jones switches from being a Trump to a Musk sycophant, calling him 'the new Trump, but better.’ Donald Trump warned that he is prepared to become a “veto president" regardless of the Democrat's sweeping victories in the midterms. Israeli opposition unites behind Eisenkot as Netanyahu says voters chose him for…
On this month’s episode of The Dot Connector, David starts the show with an emotive and powerful message in response to the civil unrest happening in different parts of Europe, especially the mass rioting and vandalism occurring in France. Who/what does it actually benefit long-term? As more migrants from one culture integrate into the West, whose culture do they plan on accepting? News headlines covered include ‘The…
On this month's episode of The Dot Connector, David starts the show with an emotive and powerful message in response to the civil unrest happening in different parts of Europe, especially the mass rioting and vandalism occurring in France. Who/what does it actually benefit long-term? As more migrants from one culture integrate into the West, whose culture do they plan on accepting? News headlines covered include 'The…
For centuries we have been told the apocalypse means the end of the world. But take the word back to its original meaning and it says something very different: the unveiling, the revealing. In this lecture from the 1990s, David argues we are living inside that apocalypse right now - a time when magnetic change is bringing everything that has remained hidden to the surface, including the truth about the extraterrestri…
On this ninth instalment of Chin-Wag, David and Jaymie start the show with a brief recollection of the court hearing update regarding David's ban from multiple countries. The duo continue the conversation with an uncomfortable truth occurring not only in the UK but also in many other countries: the rise of babies in care proceedings, which is leading to more unnecessary adoptions. Where exactly do these children end …
During last Friday’s Dot connector, David takes a moment to deliver a timely message about the looming global energy crisis, which is sure to have (the planned) disastrous effect on Western livelihoods. He reminds us to take a step back from all the present fearmongering to remember the (also planned) future outcome – these are not random events, nor should they be treated as such.
Showing the 12 most recent of 43 posts we hold for @davidickeofficial. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 28 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
The Crowhouse @thecrowhouseoffical · 29,267 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 8 September 2026
Reiner Fuellmich 🇺🇸/🇬🇧/🇦🇺 @ReinerFuellmichEnglish · 83,207 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 18 August 2026
Alex Jones @AlexJonesChannel · 27,350 Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 September 2026
The Exposé News (Official) @dailyexpose · 27,447 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 September 2026
Dr David Martin @DrDavidMartin · 49,721 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 25 August 2026
Christine Anderson, MdEP (AfD) @christineanderson · 34,916 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 2 September 2026
Stew Peters ✝️🇺🇸 @stewpeters · 132,267 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 13 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon solo channel @DrMikeYeadonsolochannel · 25,916 Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 13 September 2026
REALCHRISSKY @realchrissky · 31,494 Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 8 September 2026
Health Ranger @RealHealthRanger · 62,372 Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 21 August 2026
Children’s Health Defense @childrenshd · 52,345 Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 24 August 2026
INFOWARS.COM 🚫🚫🚫 @infowarslive · 22,121 Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 20 September 2026
FallCabal Official Channel @Fall_of_the_Cabal · 80,962 Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 18 August 2026
Chef Pete Evans @ChefPeteEvans · 28,226 Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 8 September 2026
Dr. Bryan Ardis @BryanArdis · 36,466 Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 1 September 2026
Dr Jane Ruby @DrJaneRuby · 56,916 Telegram ranks this channel #62 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 22 August 2026
Christiane Northrup M.D @drchristianenorthrup · 40,887 Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 29 August 2026
Dr. Mercola @DoctorMercola · 30,769 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 5 September 2026
Zeee Media 🎙 @zeeemedia · 53,537 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 23 August 2026
Robin Monotti @robinmg · 66,867 Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 20 August 2026
Dr Mike Yeadon @DrMikeYeadon · 26,842 Telegram ranks this channel #67 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 11 September 2026
World Council for Health @wch_org · 33,944 Telegram ranks this channel #69 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 2 September 2026
Candace Owens On Fire🔥 @CandaceOnFire · 28,605 Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 7 September 2026
Robert W Malone, MD @RWMaloneMD · 102,955 Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 25 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cross-platform identity — Wikidata
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“David Icke Official Telegram” (@davidickeofficial), 42,257 subscribers as measured 11 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/davidickeofficial.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.