Channel
@DrBretWeinstein
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
609subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001590283183 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @DrBretWeinstein |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 14 May 2022— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/DrBretWeinstein |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 10:26 | 609 | +14 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:32 | 595 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 06:24 | 595 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 14 May 2022 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
168 reactions across 11 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 84 | 50.0% | |
| ❤ | 44 | 26.2% | |
| 💯 | 17 | 10.1% | |
| 🤬 | 12 | 7.14% | |
| 😢 | 8 | 4.76% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.19% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.595% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 168reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 14 May 2022 to 27 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
I believe the adverse events from regular old vaccines are far more common than we imagine, including things like allergies. I believe that my allergy to wheat is likely the result of an adjuvant that caused my immune system to react to something normal in my gut in a way that I will never be free from. One of my sons has seasonal allergies that are significant enough to get in his way. The other has an allergy to…
❤23👍14💯1
👆 Join @DrBretWeinstein
❤6🤬1
👆 Join @DrBretWeinstein
❤9
👆 Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍8
What a racket. Pharma had a technology that allowed it to play a new game that was going to be profitable at a new level. All pharma needed to inaugurate a brand new profit stream was the name of a scary disease. And get their contractors to rig an RCT that suggested that the platform was safe. Boom boom boom, injectable after injectable. Everything is fast tracked. Join @DrBretWeinstein
🤬11👍4
Bret Weinstein: "They are hiding everything. And what I mean by that is that they are sabotaging all of the mechanisms that we would normally use to figure out what's true. And that sounds like a wild exaggeration, but it isn't. The fact is it's not even just a an attack on the university system." "It's an attack on every single university. The research done there is low quality, not repeatable. The lessons taught t…
👍16💯6❤5😢2🔥1
Our governments should be forbidden from justifying any secrecy or lying on the pretext of preventing “panic”. That rationalization becomes universal camouflage for betrayal and coverup. We have a natural right to know what threatens us. We pay for institutions to enable us to see, not to willfully blind us. Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍22💯10👏1
Bret Weinstein Explains How the mRNA Vaccine Platform Can Cause Autoimmune Issues "The fact that there is no targeting of those mRNA's, so that they can land in any cell, means that every time you attempt to vaccinate somebody with that technology you are inviting an autoimmune attack on the tissue that happens to pick up the lipid nanoparticle." The number of design failures with the mRNA vaccines is staggering. Th…
😢6👍5❤1
I’m sure all antisemites hate the ADL, but challenging the ADL does not make you an antisemite. Nor does challenging the SPLC makes you anti black. Nor does questioning the wage-gap make you a misogynist. Nor does opposing “affirmative care” make you a transphobe. Obviously. Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍5👏1
If they try to lock us down again they’ll face a mutiny the likes of which the world has never seen. We watched them callously lie as they drained our wealth, targeted our children & plotted our subjugation. We may be stuck with the virus, but not the new world order. #Nuremberg2 Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍7
Interesting that the "science" we are supposed to be following on Ivermectin turns out to be riddled with FTX money. It's probably just a coincidence that has nothing to do with the utterly indefensible methods, sensational headlines and still-secret datasets.💰 Join @DrBretWeinstein
👍3
What does Bret Weinstein @DrBretWeinstein say about a positive outlook? Join ➡️ @ShankaraChetty
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @DrBretWeinstein. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 131,911 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Dr. Bret Weinstein” (@DrBretWeinstein), 609 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/DrBretWeinstein.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.