Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
34 measurements spanning 42 days, net -4,031. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 148,614–153,855 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 12:18
149,219
-200
15 Sept 2026, 14:22
149,419
-197
13 Sept 2026, 20:19
149,616
-154
12 Sept 2026, 02:58
149,770
-193
9 Sept 2026, 22:37
149,963
-285
6 Sept 2026, 17:17
150,248
-209
4 Sept 2026, 07:37
150,457
-124
2 Sept 2026, 20:35
150,581
-89
1 Sept 2026, 16:17
150,670
-66
31 Aug 2026, 18:08
150,736
-146
30 Aug 2026, 16:02
150,882
-46
29 Aug 2026, 18:08
150,928
-76
28 Aug 2026, 19:26
151,004
-119
27 Aug 2026, 20:33
151,123
-85
26 Aug 2026, 20:54
151,208
-44
26 Aug 2026, 00:09
151,252
-112
25 Aug 2026, 00:48
151,364
-165
23 Aug 2026, 10:05
151,529
-146
22 Aug 2026, 00:13
151,675
-161
20 Aug 2026, 19:46
151,836
first reading
Engagement
151 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 106 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 149,219 subscribers
Avg views / post
24,000
60 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.44%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
60
of 151 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held
151 (31 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total
1,439,260
Reactions total
35,121
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
26 Sept 2026, 21:02 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,510
Videos
≈1,300
Links
≈2,480
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 26 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
1h 32m
Average length
1m 55s
Measured directly from 48 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
86,950 reactions across 147 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 41.2% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
35,854
41.2%
🔥
28,912
33.3%
❤
19,866
22.8%
👎
2,318
2.67%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 151 of the 151 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 89,370 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 151 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
On October 14th, join me in Washington, D.C. for the Gold Institute’s Second Annual Indo-Pacific Summit.
We are bringing together ambassadors, government officials, national security experts, and business leaders for an important discussion about the future of the U.S.–Korea alliance and the security of the Indo-Pacific.
The alliance between our two nations was forged through tremendous sacrifice. This summit is an…
What does it mean and what does it take to be an American?
Check out what America’s Future is doing to protect our God-given rights.
https://www.americasfuture.net/newsletter/defend-the-constitution-protect-our-future/
Breaking: The Theft of American Elections: How far back does it go?
Americans have been told to trust the election systems that count their votes. Americans also deserve answers about the intelligence warnings, the vendors entrusted with election equipment, and the decisions made by officials responsible for protecting America’s election process.
With the supremely important midterms approaching, releasing document…
When you vote this November, understand you’re voting for our constitutional republic based on American values and a functioning rule of law (despite the challenges we still face in parts of our federal government).
If you don’t vote for those American values, we will eventually face this challenge addressed by the imam in this “pro sharia law in America” video.
Get out and vote for Patriots and conservatives who w…
I don’t care about the United Nations at this moment. The UN is only giving the United States headaches.
I care about accountability and it is because of this statement below by Representative Clay Higgins that still gives the nation pause about our DOJ and FBI.
Everyone that has paid attention knows that J6 was a set up.
Why can’t we get to the bottom of it immediately?
What is stopping the FBI from releasing th…
President Trump should use today’s address to the United Nations to make clear what America expects from the rest of the world and how we (America) intend to help secure peace in both Europe and in the Middle East.
He must clearly define the objectives.
Explain what must happen for the fighting to stop.
Tell our allies, partners and friends what they must contribute and,
Tell our adversaries what terms they must meet…
What’s next matters a lot less than what’s right in front of each of us today.
You don’t need a title, a national platform, or permission from anyone to make a difference. Look at your own community. Find where you can serve, lead, speak up, or simply help someone who needs it.
That’s where change starts.
LOCAL ACTION = NATIONAL IMPACT
In order for our Nation to survive another 250 years, we must hold accountable those who abused their power and worked to subvert our institutions from within.
If people in our government abused their authority or broke the law (and we now know they did), we must hold them accountable.
I don't care what agency they worked for, what title they held, or who they know.
No one is above the law!
You may not want war but war wants you. The military industrial complex exists globally for the globalists.
Something is seriously wrong with what is happening in this European war.
What happened to the recent “peace” negotiations and did Zelensky give our POTUS the finger by bombing Russian refineries last 24 hrs, which simply beg for this level of retaliation?
BREAKING: Perpetual Wars vs Perpetual Peace
Perpetual wars have no net benefits for anyone who fights, funds, or lives through them. Yet, our politicians and corporate titans seem to love them.
War destroys lives, capital, and institutions while transferring resources to a narrow set of elite interests.
Most claims made (usually by those who don’t have to fight) of any benefits usually describe positive side effec…
U.S. Army Colonel Theresa Long’s testimony in support of Ivan Raiklin is part of a defamation lawsuit brought by Dr. Terry Adirim who had been a senior Pentagon health official advising on the COVID mandate. The discovery in this case appears to be exposing some very serious (deadly) consequences of the COVID VAX.
Thanks to the indomitable Catherine Herridge for her reporting.
👍456🔥143❤56
Showing the 12 most recent of 151 posts we hold for @RealGenFlynn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republished by 138 registered channels. The 48 listed are the ones that have forwarded the most posts; the rest are counted here but not each listed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 19 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 12 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Tracy Beanz @TracybeanzOfficial · 26,479 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 September 2026
Wendy Rogers @wendyrogersaz · 45,674 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 27 August 2026
⚡️ 🇺🇸 Sidney Powell 🇺🇸 🗽 @SidneyPowell · 127,205 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 13 August 2026
Marco Polo @MarcoPolo501c3 · 32,430 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 4 September 2026
Praying Medic @praying_medic · 97,951 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 15 August 2026
Mike Lindell @MichaelJLindell · 78,848 Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 18 August 2026
Liz Harrington @LizHarrington76 · 22,953 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 19 September 2026
General Patton 🪖 @GeneralPatton17 · 39,147 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 30 August 2026
Right Side Broadcasting Network (RSBN) @rsbnetwork · 103,061 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 August 2026
Mikki Willis Official @OfficialPlandemic · 33,413 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 4 September 2026
✞ Dr C ✞ @InevitableET · 38,818 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 31 August 2026
TheStormHasArrived17 @TheStormHasArrived17 · 92,725 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 16 August 2026
John Durham @johndurhamchannel · 24,195 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 16 September 2026
Jon Herold @patelpatriot · 84,673 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 2 September 2026
David Clements @theprofessorsrecord · 50,604 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 25 August 2026
Captain Keshel and Co. American Election Integrity HQ @ElectionHQ2024 · 69,581 Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 20 August 2026
The Babylon Bee @TheBabylonBee · 94,841 Telegram ranks this channel #8 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 16 August 2026
Princess Diana 👒 @PrincessDiana_Q · 60,499 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 56 here — alongside 55 others — read 22 August 2026
Dan Scavino FORCE🇺🇸🦅 @DanScavinoFORCE · 90,076 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 16 August 2026
Trump Supporters Channel 🇺🇸 @TrumpChannel · 133,650 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 13 August 2026
Shadow of Ezra @ShadowofEzra · 146,732 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 12 August 2026
James O'Keefe @JamesOKeefeIII · 166,322 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
Jeffrey Peterson - jeff.pro @jeffdotpro · 24,014 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 17 September 2026
JovanHuttonPulitzer @JovanHuttonPulitzer · 26,546 Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 11 September 2026
This channel appears in 165 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“General Flynn ️” (@RealGenFlynn), 149,219 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RealGenFlynn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
