Channel
@vitaliy_klitschko
On this record: Topic · Observations · Also posting the same content · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cross-platform identity · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry
189,689subscribers
-387 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.
| Telegram ID | -1001290660837 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @vitaliy_klitschko |
| Description | Про #твійкиїв і його мера |
| Created | 16 May 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 13 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/vitaliy_klitschko |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
155,000 average views per post against 189,689 subscribers — an engagement rate of 81.8%. Across the 6,910 registered channels in the same cohort — 100,018–316,087 subscribers — the middle half sit between 2.10% and 14.2%, with a median of 5.93%.
| Window | 30 days (19 July 2026 – 18 August 2026) |
|---|---|
| Posts measured | 32 of 32 published in the window (0 exact, 32 rounded by Telegram) |
| Views totalled | 4,962,800 |
| Mature posts only | 82.4% over 31 posts read at least 24h after publication |
| Subscribers | 189,689 measured 17 August 2026 |
| Cohort | b100000 · 6,910 channels · p10 0.679% · p25 2.10% · p50 5.93% · p75 14.2% · p90 27.3% |
| Position in cohort | 99.624th percentile · 13.8× the cohort median |
| Uncertainty | ±0.155% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding |
| Post language | Ukrainian · 100.0%of the window’s posts |
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal.A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 18 August 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
This channel’s posts match, word for word or near enough, posts on 2 other registered channels, found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register. That matching has been checked by hand against the live Telegram pages and found reliable — 0 wrong of 45 pairs re-read.
Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown. The same hand-check found that reading wrong 18 of 45 times — 60%, no better than a coin flip — because it depends on how deep our own crawl happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Word-for-word matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 23:03 | 189,689 | -46 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:53 | 189,735 | -13 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 189,748 | -62 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:38 | 189,810 | -55 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 189,865 | -48 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 189,913 | -41 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 23:46 | 189,954 | +62 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:34 | 189,892 | -49 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 23:36 | 189,941 | -16 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:33 | 189,957 | -60 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 21:49 | 190,017 | -59 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 190,076 | no change |
| 5 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 190,076 | first reading |
32 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 28 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 17 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 32 (4 August 2026 – 17 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,962,800 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 18 Aug 2026, 09:54 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Київ отримав ще 3 пожежних авто від Брюссельської столичної служби пожежної охорони та екстреної медичної допомоги. Під час повномасштабної війни, коли нашому місту важливо оперативно реагувати на надзвичайні ситуації, ця допомога дозволить рятувати більше життів, зокрема, під час ворожих атак. Також вшанували памʼять друга Києва, старшого сержанта Олів’є Франкотта, який загинув під час рятувальної операції після в…
В Оболонському районі, внаслідок атаки ворога, сталося падіння уламків та загоряння в нежитлових приміщеннях за двома адресами. Біля одного з приміщень палають кілька авто. У Голосіївському районі пожежа на території нежитлової забудови. Екстрені служби працюють на місцях.
Пожежа в Оболонському районі столиці на території нежитлової забудови. Екстрені служби на місці. Також, внаслідок атаки, палає нежитлове приміщення в Голосіївському районі.
Вибухи в столиці. Київ під атакою балістики. Перебувайте в укриттях!
У Деснянському районі, внаслідок падіння уламків, пошкоджений вхід до одного із комунальних медзакладів. Потерпілих немає.
Сьогодні, в День молоді, відзначив талановитих представників молодого покоління столиці премією Київського міського голови — за наукові та творчі досягнення, за внесок у розвиток молодіжного руху. Нагороду отримали ті, хто своїми знаннями, талантом, працею та енергією робить Київ більш динамічним і сучасним. Відзначення молоді премією — це свідчення того, що місто цінує працю молодих киян та вірить у їхній потенціа…
У Дарницькому районі, внаслідок падіння ворожого БпЛА, пошкоджене нежитлове приміщення. Пожежі немає. Екстрені служби прямують на місце.
У столиці працюють сили ППО по ворожих БпЛА. Перебувайте в укриттях!
Виклик медиків у Шевченківський район Києва. Бригада виїхала.
Вибухи в столиці. Місто під атакою балістики. Перебувайте в укриттях!
Четверо постраждалих у столиці внаслідок атаки ворога. Трьом із них медики надали допомогу амбулаторно, одному — на місці.
За попередньою інформацією, в Голосіївському районі загоряння на території нежитлової забудови. В Оболонському районі надійшло повідомлення про загоряння резервуарів з паливом. Екстрені служби прямують на місця.
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @vitaliy_klitschko. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 2,591 of 1,549,376entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 48 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 11 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 73 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Vitali Klitschko |
|---|---|
| Description | Ukrainian boxer and politician (1971-) |
| X / Twitter | @vitaliy_klychko |
| YouTube | UCvsytGcgYkvwV1_Av8LqnAA |
| Official site | http://klitschko.com/ |
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
4 Wikipedia articles name this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Hacker News
This handle was named once in a Hacker News comment or story, via the public Algolia search API. HN comment and story text has no confirmed reuse licence, so nothing quoted from either is reproduced here — only that a mention exists, when, and by whom, with a link to read it at the source.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Віталій Кличко” (@vitaliy_klitschko), 189,689 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vitaliy_klitschko.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.