Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 94% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 7 days, net +6,123. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 940,672–948,929 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
12 Aug 2026, 15:34
947,841
-135
12 Aug 2026, 04:25
947,976
+261
11 Aug 2026, 15:03
947,715
-123
11 Aug 2026, 01:02
947,838
+163
10 Aug 2026, 13:33
947,675
-1
10 Aug 2026, 01:23
947,676
+639
9 Aug 2026, 10:33
947,037
+2,050
9 Aug 2026, 04:20
944,987
+2,577
8 Aug 2026, 07:32
942,410
+63
8 Aug 2026, 05:14
942,347
+574
7 Aug 2026, 08:15
941,773
-25
7 Aug 2026, 04:58
941,798
+173
6 Aug 2026, 06:50
941,625
-41
6 Aug 2026, 05:00
941,666
no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:52
941,666
-52
6 Aug 2026, 00:41
941,718
first reading
Engagement
1,050 posts held, back to 13 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 83 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
27.5%
avg views ÷ 947,841 subscribers
Avg views / post
261,000
578 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.831%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
578
of 1,050 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held
1,050 (13 June 2026 – 12 August 2026)
Views total
150,764,401
Reactions total
1,252,378
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 17:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈23,300
Videos
≈19,300
Links
≈32,600
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Video runtime
36m 15s
Average length
37s
Measured directly from 59 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
View velocity
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
60 minutes: 59,603 interp. → 3.0 hours: 111,306 interp. → 6.0 hours: 151,000still climbing at last reading
not yet at 24h
1.5 hoursprovisional — final view count still climbing
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed viewsis the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
Reaction mix
258,531 reactions across 143 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
custom 5399939699814980236
70,753
27.4%
custom 6325524440801084490
62,099
24.0%
👎
32,712
12.7%
👍
29,330
11.3%
🤡
24,976
9.66%
custom 6228793071396456322
19,526
7.55%
custom 5352573696668081624
9,286
3.59%
custom 5440724219631542592
4,101
1.59%
custom 5235694820361511198
3,022
1.17%
custom 5402399569319318740
1,710
0.661%
custom 5235885954996117674
1,016
0.393%
Custom emoji. 8 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,370,501reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
0.7%
7 of 1,000 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
252,000
over 7 measured posts
Median views · rest
263,000
over 993 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor.A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 17 June 2026 to 12 August 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
👅 Просим папищиков с премиум-подпиской проголосовать за канал, чтобы помочь нам открыть следующую сторис и дополнительные реакции под постами ➡ https://t.me/boost/xydessa
ps: проголосовавшим навсегда доступны комментарии в канале, даже после истечения премиума (не забудьте в них вступить) 💬
#нампишут
Дед сел напротив девушки с ребенком сначала начал тыкать какой-то свой кефир, но это пол беды. Потом расстегнул штаны и начал дрочить. Ушел только когда сказали что полицию вызовут
⚓️ Хуевая Одесса | LIVE
Афиша | Прислать новость
⛓️Як підготуватись до анального сексу?
🔥 Пози в сексі, які звужують піхву, збільшують член та задоволення.
🫦Техніки мінету та еротична білизна З ДЕМОНСТРАЦІЄЮ НАЖИВО🔥
🤞🏽Фістинг та лінгам, йоні масаж.
незвичайна вагінальна стимуляція😎
Секрети топового сексблогера Олександри Петрайчук для тебе БЕЗКОШТОВНО!
👇🏼 підписуйся, щоб про все дізнатись:
https://t.me/+2TdkYr0xnG01ZTAy
а також:
❤️ ІГРАШКИ ДЛЯ СЕКСУ з шален…
😨 На Гайдара, 32 несколько соседок обратились в полицию из-за 91-летней женщины, которая уже двое суток находилась на улице и не могла попасть домой. Женщина утверждала, что её не пускает в квартиру сын. Спасатели в присутствии полиции вскрыли дверь и обнаружили внутри тело её 62-летнего сына уже с признаками разложения. Тело направили на судебно-медицинскую экспертизу, причина смерти пока неизвестна.
⚓️ Хуевая Одес…
Вчера на улице Ильфа и Петрова КОРД штурмовал квартиру 50-летнего мужика, который забаррикадировался и угрожал полицейским автоматом и гранатой 🔫
Полицейские прибыли к нему для проведения санкционированного обыска в рамках дела о незаконном обращении с оружием, однако мужик отказался открывать дверь и начал угрожать оружием. ДСНС принудительно вскрыли квартиру, после чего мужик заявил, что ебанёт гранату и откроет с…
💛💙14.08 Благодійний захід на підтримку дітей, які втратили батьків через війну 🙏🏼🧑🧒🧒
В ІНСТ РОЗІГРУЮТЬ 10 квитків 👌🏼
Усі кошти, зібрані з продажу вхідних квитків, будуть повністю спрямовані на благодійність 🙌🏼
Ніч якісного європейського саунду та незабутньої атмосфери разом із ЗАПРОШЕНИМ DJ СВІТОВОГО РІВНЯ — PASCAL ROTH 🔥🎶🪩
🇫🇷 PASCAL ROTH — французький DJ, продюсер і музикант з фірмовим звучанням Tech House, Prog…
Showing the 12 most recent of 1,050 posts we hold for @xydessa. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@xydessa edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
8 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 52,663 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 24 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
4
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
4
vacant every time we have ever looked
@xydessa named 4 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@british_language_academy_ua named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
@anker named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@fitness_club_smile named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
@wow_name named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s.When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
⚔️БРАТЧУК @Bratchuk_Sergey · 151,177 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 12 August 2026
Повітряна тривога️ | Бережіть себе! @raketna_neb · 210,690 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
Труха⚡️Одеса | Новини @odesatruexa · 250,155 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Типичная Одесса @odessa_typical · 255,509 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 10 August 2026
Одесса как она есть @odessapublic · 313,396 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
Новости Одесса | Одеса @our_odessa · 450,875 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Одесса INFO ⚓️ 🇺🇦 Новости | Одеса @odessa_infonews · 983,365 Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
Сила Громади @Sila_GO · 247,863 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
ОДЕССА ИНФО LIVE - радар Одеса @odessa_inform · 373,755 Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Хуевый Херсон 🇺🇦 @hueviyherson · 297,013 Telegram ranks this channel #3 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Новости Николаева🇺🇦 | Миколаїв @novostiniko · 250,111 Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Артем Дмитрук @dmytrukartem · 161,335 Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 12 August 2026
Всевидящее ОКО 18 ✙ @oko18_ukr · 307,407 Telegram ranks this channel #12 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Николаевский Ванёк @vanek_nikolaev · 2,669,113 Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 7 August 2026
Всевидящее ОКО: Україна | Політика @oko_ua · 1,147,761 Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 8 August 2026
Волхва України Ольга Берлінська @VolxvaUkrain · 165,776 Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 12 August 2026
Новое Издание @Novoeizdanie · 193,676 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 11 August 2026
Труха⚡️Україна @truexanewsua · 3,167,312 Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 7 August 2026
➕Ігор Мосійчук 🦏 @mosiychuk72 · 503,150 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 10 August 2026
Україна Online: Новини | Політика @UaOnlii · 1,561,387 Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 8 August 2026
INSIDER UA @insiderukr · 2,168,347 Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 7 August 2026
Хуевый Днепр | Дніпро @huevyi_dnepr · 166,258 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 12 August 2026
Харьков life | Харків 🇺🇦 @kharkivlife · 672,193 Telegram ranks this channel #22 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 8 August 2026
Gura Anton @guraanton · 267,229 Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
This channel appears in 115 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Domains linked from posts
25 domainsthis channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.
Wikipedia
One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.
Хуевая Одесса(ru.wikipedia.org) “…{{Карточка сайта
| название = Хуевая Одесса или XYDESSA
| url = https://t.me/xydessa
| коммерческий = да
| тип = развлекательно-новостной Телеграм-канал…” read 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Хуевая Одесса” (@xydessa), 947,841 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/xydessa.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
