Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Спільнота Стерненка

Channel

Спільнота Стерненка

@sternenkofund

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

22,187subscribers

+428 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002297756196
TypeChannel
Username@sternenkofund
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/sternenkofund

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 90% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Views per post sit far above this size band

35,000 average views per post against 22,187 subscribers — an engagement rate of 157.8%. Across the 1,488 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,009–31,575 subscribers, posting mainly in Ukrainian — the middle half sit between 10.3% and 26.6%, with a median of 16.9%.

What this was computed from
Window30 days (24 August 2026 23 September 2026)
Posts measured34 of 34 published in the window (1 exact, 33 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled1,190,427
Mature posts only171.8% over 31 posts read at least 24h after publication
Subscribers22,187 measured 17 September 2026
Cohortb10000:ukr · 1,488 channels · p10 6.33% · p25 10.3% · p50 16.9% · p75 26.6% · p90 39.5%
Position in cohort99.731th percentile · 9.4× the cohort median
Uncertainty±0.139% of the figure, from Telegram’s rounding
Post languageUkrainian · 100.0% of the window’s posts

When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or above the 99th percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — above it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.

This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.

Recorded under the key err_high, last confirmed 23 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

21,75922,18721,9736 August 2026 — 21,759 subscribers6 August 2026 — 21,759 subscribers7 August 2026 — 21,772 subscribers8 August 2026 — 21,804 subscribers9 August 2026 — 21,806 subscribers10 August 2026 — 21,823 subscribers11 August 2026 — 21,863 subscribers12 August 2026 — 21,878 subscribers14 August 2026 — 21,855 subscribers16 August 2026 — 21,846 subscribers17 August 2026 — 21,833 subscribers18 August 2026 — 21,824 subscribers19 August 2026 — 21,833 subscribers20 August 2026 — 21,841 subscribers21 August 2026 — 21,846 subscribers23 August 2026 — 21,858 subscribers24 August 2026 — 21,854 subscribers25 August 2026 — 21,847 subscribers26 August 2026 — 21,834 subscribers27 August 2026 — 21,846 subscribers28 August 2026 — 21,851 subscribers29 August 2026 — 21,863 subscribers30 August 2026 — 21,867 subscribers31 August 2026 — 21,868 subscribers1 September 2026 — 21,878 subscribers2 September 2026 — 21,843 subscribers4 September 2026 — 21,838 subscribers6 September 2026 — 21,852 subscribers10 September 2026 — 21,842 subscribers12 September 2026 — 22,065 subscribers13 September 2026 — 22,114 subscribers15 September 2026 — 22,157 subscribers17 September 2026 — 22,187 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net +428. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 21,695–22,251 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 16:5822,187+30
15 Sept 2026, 17:3922,157+43
13 Sept 2026, 22:5722,114+49
12 Sept 2026, 08:5722,065+223
10 Sept 2026, 01:3721,842-10
6 Sept 2026, 17:3921,852+14
4 Sept 2026, 03:2021,838-5
2 Sept 2026, 20:4421,843-35
1 Sept 2026, 17:4721,878+10
31 Aug 2026, 15:2521,868+1
30 Aug 2026, 16:5821,867+4
29 Aug 2026, 20:0521,863+12
28 Aug 2026, 20:1321,851+5
27 Aug 2026, 18:4521,846+12
26 Aug 2026, 20:3321,834-13
25 Aug 2026, 22:3521,847-7
24 Aug 2026, 21:1321,854-4
23 Aug 2026, 03:5321,858+12
21 Aug 2026, 13:2621,846+5
20 Aug 2026, 10:5221,841first reading

Engagement

89 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
162.1%
avg views ÷ 22,187 subscribers
Avg views / post
36,000
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.471%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 89 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held89 (3 August 20263 September 2026)
Views total1,186,867
Reactions total5,585
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 54s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 42 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

13,511 reactions across 84 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
9,44869.9%
🔥3,09422.9%
👍5734.24%
😢2892.14%
🎉950.703%
🤬120.089%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 89 of the 89 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 14,169 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 89 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 12:30 UTC977 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

+112 FPV-дронів та інше майно закупили за минулу добу! Серед них 20 перехоплювачів шахедів. Загалом на суму 5 618 470 гривень. Від початку місяця ми придбали 415 FPV — це 8% від місячного плану. Більше цікавої статистики на нашому сайті sternenkofund.org Загалом за весь час закупили 292 011 FPV. Долучайтесь до Русорізу!🚀

34👍4

3 Sept 2026, 10:25 UTC≈1,800 views69 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ЧИМ ЗАПАМ’ЯТАВСЯ СЕРПЕНЬ? Упродовж серпня разом із вами нам вдалося зібрати 203 292 197 гривень, за які закупили 3 143 FPV-дрони. Крім того, придбали іншого необхідного обладнання на понад 16 мільйонів гривень, а також у межах проєкту ReDrone переробили 554 дрони на суму майже 5 мільйонів гривень. Дякуємо за небайдужість! Продовжуймо допомагати тим, хто захищає Україну💛 Більше цифр дивіться в інфографіці. Детальн

57👍8🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 15:15 UTC≈5,700 views142 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Реактивні шахеди — що далі? Ешелони дронів-перехоплювачів збивають близько 90% звичайних шахедів (за даними президента України). Та з реактивними ситуація набагато складніша. Реактивні шахеди «Герань-4» відрізняються від звичайних швидкістю та конструкцією. Вони мають китайський турбодвигун, який забезпечує середню швидкість 400–600 км/год — порівняно з близько 300 км/год у попередніх моделей. Змінена конструкція та

105🔥30👍6😢1

2 Sept 2026, 13:02 UTC≈2,850 views99 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Нова поставка — 111 дронів уже в Силах оборони. Дякуємо за постійну допомогу! +30 оптоволоконних FPV для Шершнів Довбуша 68 ОАеМБр. +50 10-ти дюймових FPV для воїнів 118 ОМБр. +1 22-дюймовий FPV для бБпС 57 ОМПБр. +30 зенітних FPV для ББС 117 ОВМБр. 🏦 Постійна банка: send.monobank.ua/jar/2JbpBYkhMv 💳Підписка через Монобазу: base.monobank.ua/rusoriz 💸PayPal: [email protected] 🏦Конверт Приват: https://next.

70🔥21👍8

2 Sept 2026, 11:30 UTC≈2,830 views107 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

+159 FPV-дронів та інше майно закупили за минулу добу! Серед них 20 перехоплювачів шахедів. Також закупили 2 авто на суму 3 127 570 гривень. Загалом на суму 11 317 440 гривень. Від початку місяця ми придбали 303 FPV — це 6% від місячного плану. Більше цікавої статистики на нашому сайті sternenkofund.org Загалом за весь час закупили 291 899 FPV. Долучайтесь до Русорізу!🚀

75🔥24👍8

1 Sept 2026, 14:52 UTC≈3,210 views131 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Ще 130 дронів завдяки вам передали до Сил оборони. Дякуємо за регулярну допомогу! +100 10-ти дюймових FPV для ББС Апачі 81 ОАеМБр. +10 зенітних FPV для воїнів 117 ОВМБр. +20 10-ти дюймових FPV для бБпС Спалах 28 ОМБр. 🏦 Постійна банка: send.monobank.ua/jar/2JbpBYkhMv 💳Підписка через Монобазу: base.monobank.ua/rusoriz 💸PayPal: [email protected] 🏦Конверт Приват: https://next.privat24.ua/env/donate/a0f593eb

106👍16🔥9

1 Sept 2026, 09:36 UTC≈3,230 views121 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

+144 FPV-дрони та інше майно закупили за минулу добу! Загалом на суму 7 451 775 гривень. Від початку місяця ми придбали 144 FPV — це 3% від місячного плану. Більше цікавої статистики на нашому сайті sternenkofund.org Загалом за весь час закупили 291 740 FPV. Долучайтесь до Русорізу!🚀

88🔥24👍9

31 Aug 2026, 16:29 UTC≈275,000 views170 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Реактивні шахеди — будемо збивати? Про це і не тільки поспілкувались з Романом «Халком» — Героєм України, повним кавалером ордена «За мужність», командиром взводу підрозділу «Bulava» 72 ОМБр у якого рахунку вже понад 500 збитих шахедів. Обовʼязково дивіться повне інтервʼю на нашому YouTube: https://youtu.be/HpRydXWtQKM Підписуйтесь📹

151👍13🔥4😢2

31 Aug 2026, 14:43 UTC≈3,490 views113 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Понад 4 000 000 грн зібрали разом із GUNIA Project. І це ще не все! Ми вже перевиконали початкову мету на 500 000 грн, а отже, зможемо закупити ще більше цифрових FPV-дронів для Сил оборони України. Але до 8 вересня ви все ще можете долучитися до розіграшу унікальної золотої прикраси «Я» з колекції «Абетка. Георгій Нарбут». Колекція привертає увагу до творчості Георгія Нарбута та його внеску в українську візуальну

100🔥13

31 Aug 2026, 11:32 UTC≈3,120 views115 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Ще 202 дрони за останні дві доби завдяки вам передали до Сил оборони. Дякуємо за регулярну допомогу. +20 зенітних FPV для воїнів 3 ОШБр. +45 оптоволоконних FPV для бійців мпб 30 ОМБр. +30 зенітних FPV для бійців 2 ОЗСП ОМЕГА НГУ. +10 15-ти дюймових FPV для одного з підрозділів СБУ. +47 оптоволоконних FPV для ББС 36 ОБрМП. +20 10-ти дюймових FPV для 15 БрОП Кара-Даг НГУ. +30 оптоволоконних FPV для ББС Апачі 81 ОАеМБр

91🔥18👍6

31 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC≈3,000 views113 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

+144 FPV-дрони та інше майно закупили за минулі дві доби! Загалом на суму 6 238 165 гривень. Від початку місяця ми придбали 3 143 FPV — це 63% від місячного плану. Більше цікавої статистики на нашому сайті sternenkofund.org Загалом за весь час закупили 291 596 FPV. Долучайтесь до Русорізу!🚀

99🔥6😢5👍3

29 Aug 2026, 13:04 UTC≈3,650 views147 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Нова поставка — 100 дронів уже в Силах оборони. Дякуємо за регулярну допомогу. +50 10-ти дюймових FPV для одного з підрозділів ЦСО А СБУ. +20 10-ти дюймових FPV для бійців 13 ГУ ДВКР СБУ. +30 перехоплювачів шахедів для воїнів 420 ОПБпС Astur. 🏦 Постійна банка: send.monobank.ua/jar/2JbpBYkhMv 💳Підписка через Монобазу: base.monobank.ua/rusoriz 💸PayPal: [email protected] 🏦Конверт Приват: https://next.privat2

118🔥23👍6

Showing the 12 most recent of 89 posts we hold for @sternenkofund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

STERNENKO
@ssternenko · 882,036
9 posts
SIGNUM
@umftteam · 23,250
5 posts
Дикі шершні 🐝🇺🇦 | Ударні дрони-камікадзе🧨🚀
@wild_hornets · 20,577
4 posts
Іван рекомендує музику
@Ivanrecs · 47
2 posts
🍉пікчорс🇺🇦
@picchors · 1,669
2 posts
Ptashka Drones
@ptashka_drones · 9,094
2 posts
➕QUICK DEATH➕
@quickdeaht · 1,320
2 posts
Inzhur
@InzhurREIT · 57,304
1 post
ОГо!
@OGoMono · 651,038
1 post
Saprobasni Live Channel
@Saprobasni_Live · 282
1 post
Солов'єVox✨️
@Solovie_Vox · 68
1 post
Victory Drones
@VictoryDrones2023 · 23,336
1 post
COMFY.UA
@comfysale · 49,044
1 post
Ескадрон
@escadrone · 24,488
1 post
Exilenova+
@exilenova_plus · 287,167
1 post
Студенти ХПІ 🇺🇦
@khpistudents · 4,114
1 post
Кошеня нявчить у мікрофон
@kosenaaaa · 26
1 post
Kovalchuk IT
@kovalchuk_it · 3,330
1 post
Лачен пише
@lachentyt · 1,554,565
1 post
мastyrbator2003(Може)
@mastyrbator2003 · 54
1 post
✙Український Націоналіст✙🇺🇦
@nacionalist_ua · 12,988
1 post
Продизайн
@prodesign_in_ua · 1,343
1 post
𝐊𝐎𝐇𝐀𝐍𝐀#
@serkovirt · 154
1 post
SKARLAT🇺🇦
@skarlatop · 4,213
1 post
StudAlliance
@studalliancekhpi · 197
1 post
Твій космос можливостей 🚀
@tviyspace · 29,309
1 post
Андрій Карпов Полтава
@vata_show · 26,282
1 post
WINFLY DRONES
@winflyua · 366
1 post
рест | вбийте мене під цвинтар літаків.
@yaterpilapitannya · 79
1 post

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Спільнота Стерненка (uk.wikipedia.org)
“…[https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCHT13FKSkcJUTVg2C2vtM4A YouTube] * [https://t.me/sternenkofund Telegram] == Додаткові джерела == * [https://www.theguardian…”
read 13 September 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Спільнота Стерненка” (@sternenkofund), 22,187 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sternenkofund.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.