Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
洛希极限
@RocheLimit
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
10,697subscribers
-14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001288056915 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @RocheLimit |
| Created | 30 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/RocheLimit |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 18:03 | 10,697 | -4 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:44 | 10,701 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:15 | 10,702 | -3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 16:58 | 10,705 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 20:20 | 10,706 | -3 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:26 | 10,709 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:00 | 10,711 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 10,711 | first reading |
Engagement
40 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 15 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 13.1%
- avg views ÷ 10,697 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,400
- 40 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 40
- of 40 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 40 (4 August 2026 – 12 August 2026) |
| Views total | 55,846 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 13:50 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 27m 11s
- Average length
- 9m 04s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Video, posted without a caption
“检查一下大米是不是进过日本博物馆,我这边暂时建议把大米开除中国籍。 你像华北地区的人,小时候就不咋吃大米,这大米能是什么中国货? 大概率是境外势力渗透。” “我山东人,我小时候真没人吃大米,但是听说日本人爱吃大米,还爱用大米做各种食品” “对上了,这下对上了” “我也是山东的,我也没见过大米,我支持你” “越光米一看就是外务省发力了,活做的太糙了” “大米在日本被称为银舍利,是送礼佳品。这一下子就说的通了” “中国人谁送礼物会送大米呢? 一个在日本很上档次,值得送礼的东西,突然爆发舆情,感觉不奇怪吗? 所以我觉得这是一次精准的对华认知战战术预演,事件并非普通的礼品翻车,也不是普通企业公关危机,更不属于自然爆发的普通网络舆情。它是境外认知作战势力,依托成熟战术模板、固定传播团伙、内外回流链路,针对中国本土舆论场、民族情绪、政企形象、网络治理体系完成的一次低成本、高精度、全流程认知战战术预演。“
如何看待鸿蒙智行赠送用户将在3天后过期的源自日本的越光米? - 知乎 https://www.zhihu.com/question/2070336436352587699
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
Photo, posted without a caption
美联储主席原来在这高就
Photo, posted without a caption
扔在电车底下,自然有 100 个公关来帮你掩盖消息
手里刷新了个手榴弹,如何安全走出城市?
Showing the 12 most recent of 40 posts we hold for @RocheLimit. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 169,417 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@bbacollection · 392 posts二手鱼奇谭
@idlefishFuckyBargainers · 7792 posts2.5次元日常 🍉
@acgdaily · 16,1791 postBboysoul的博客
@bboyapp · 1,5411 post中国航天🇨🇳
@CASC1956 · 531 post天才魔法少女
@haddsddd · 1,5931 postRay Tracing
@kaedeharakazuha17 · 8081 post北大神田書店
@ohhbroken · 661 postDEV Save & Load 🤯
@PatriciaBySamHou · 81 postPika广播电台 | 上班中
@PikaRadio · 1191 post碎碎念的 Thregren
@Thregren_daily · 131 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“洛希极限” (@RocheLimit), 10,697 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/RocheLimit.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.