Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 黑洞资源笔记

Channel

黑洞资源笔记

@piracy6

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

77,423subscribers

+295 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001466835758
TypeChannel
Username@piracy6
Description群组 @unnamechat
Created31 October 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held35
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/piracy6

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 86% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

77,11277,42377,267.56 August 2026 — 77,128 subscribers6 August 2026 — 77,128 subscribers7 August 2026 — 77,139 subscribers8 August 2026 — 77,128 subscribers9 August 2026 — 77,123 subscribers10 August 2026 — 77,129 subscribers11 August 2026 — 77,133 subscribers12 August 2026 — 77,129 subscribers13 August 2026 — 77,125 subscribers14 August 2026 — 77,112 subscribers16 August 2026 — 77,137 subscribers17 August 2026 — 77,134 subscribers18 August 2026 — 77,144 subscribers19 August 2026 — 77,153 subscribers20 August 2026 — 77,175 subscribers21 August 2026 — 77,189 subscribers22 August 2026 — 77,195 subscribers24 August 2026 — 77,186 subscribers25 August 2026 — 77,169 subscribers26 August 2026 — 77,181 subscribers27 August 2026 — 77,187 subscribers28 August 2026 — 77,183 subscribers29 August 2026 — 77,186 subscribers30 August 2026 — 77,182 subscribers31 August 2026 — 77,208 subscribers1 September 2026 — 77,191 subscribers2 September 2026 — 77,182 subscribers4 September 2026 — 77,181 subscribers6 September 2026 — 77,214 subscribers9 September 2026 — 77,239 subscribers11 September 2026 — 77,244 subscribers13 September 2026 — 77,257 subscribers15 September 2026 — 77,285 subscribers17 September 2026 — 77,362 subscribers25 September 2026 — 77,423 subscribers6 August 202625 September 2026
35 measurements spanning 50 days, net +295. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 77,065–77,470 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 35
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 07:4277,423+61
17 Sept 2026, 05:5777,362+77
15 Sept 2026, 06:5477,285+28
13 Sept 2026, 18:5877,257+13
11 Sept 2026, 21:5777,244+5
9 Sept 2026, 13:4177,239+25
6 Sept 2026, 06:4077,214+33
4 Sept 2026, 03:0177,181-1
2 Sept 2026, 18:4577,182-9
1 Sept 2026, 17:4477,191-17
31 Aug 2026, 20:3677,208+26
30 Aug 2026, 17:0577,182-4
29 Aug 2026, 14:1777,186+3
28 Aug 2026, 11:5377,183-4
27 Aug 2026, 12:0777,187+6
26 Aug 2026, 12:1577,181+12
25 Aug 2026, 09:1777,169-17
24 Aug 2026, 09:1777,186-9
22 Aug 2026, 20:3577,195+6
21 Aug 2026, 13:1877,189first reading

Engagement

185 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 108 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.83%
avg views ÷ 77,423 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,420
129 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.276%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
131
of 185 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 91 of 129 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 September 2026
Posts held185 (26 July 2026 – 26 September 2026)
Views total182,858
Reactions total402
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Sept 2026, 13:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈20,100
Videos
≈906
Links
≈16,800

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 27 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
13m 34s
Average length
1m 42s

Measured directly from 8 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

658 reactions across 112 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 30.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19830.1%
❤16024.3%
💩12118.4%
👎609.12%
🤮284.26%
🤡223.34%
😭182.74%
😁162.43%
👏71.06%
🖕71.06%
🤬71.06%
😢50.76%
😱40.608%
🎉30.456%
👀10.152%
🤣10.152%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 131 of the 185 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 658 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 185 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.32%
8 of 185 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,240
over 8 measured posts
Median views · rest
1,430
over 175 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Measured over the 185 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 26 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

26 Sept 2026, 05:55 UTC≈2,040 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026

出去考试了,频道停更至10月1日左右

👍21🎉3👀1

25 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC≈2,510 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

【云端AI Agent,注定活在“数字监狱”里吗?】| blog OpenAI在安全评测中曾遇到离奇一幕:为了在测试中拿到高分,AI智能体利用代理漏洞逃出沙箱连上外网,甚至建了个留言板协同刺探外部系统。 给模型一个目标并让它反复尝试,模型越强就越容易突破原本的执行边界,如果放任它在本地直接调用权限与文件,隐患可想而知。 Norman Ponte在这篇长文中指出,将智能体封入云端隔离牢笼已是必然:利用单veth网络命名空间隔离、结合eBPF挂钩与外部独立进程的白名单机制,逐一审查网络出站请求,在放手让它干活的同时彻底切断越界路径,对安全沙箱演进的推演非常扎实。

❤3

25 Sept 2026, 08:47 UTC≈2,130 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

平时看到好的视频、图文和播客,收藏后往往成了“信息黑洞”,写东西时很难翻出原文出处。 开源工具 Chubby Skills 刚好解决了这个痛点,它包含命令行工具与 14 个技能包,能把 B站、小红书、公众号、抖音及播客等内容抓取并整理成规范的本地 Markdown。 针对音视频支持字幕优先抓取免 GPU 跑转录,也支持本地音频转录与 PDF 导入。所有素材完整保留原始来源,不仅支持本地关键词与语义检索,还能一键导出带行号与逐字摘录的选题资料包。项目还自带知识库 MCP 服务,方便直接接入各类 Agent 辅助创作。

25 Sept 2026, 08:44 UTC≈1,950 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

从零构建一个Jev风格的分类模型 | 帖子 | 配套代码与流程 构建专属的轻量分类模型并不需要高昂投入。 Together AI 开源的 tev1 项目演示了如何基于 Qwen3.5 4B 定制类似 Jev 的分类器。通过整理 3.8 万条涵盖意图识别、规则判定与情感分析的多任务样本,仅需花费 17 美元和 25 分钟微调,就能得到一个直接输出规范 JSON 结果的专用模型。 训练完成后支持一键部署为 HTTP 接口,跑客服判别、工单流转或文本归类都很利落;不想自行微调也可直接调用其 Serverless 版本,输入每百万 token 仅需 0.042 美元且输出免费。

20 Sept 2026, 09:59 UTC≈4,750 views0 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

各类新模型层出不穷,恨不得向全世界证明自己能写、能聊。然而,近期风头最劲、刷屏全网的顶流,却是 Jev。它一句话都不说,到底怎么玩? ——APPSO

20 Sept 2026, 00:19 UTC≈4,970 views25 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

👍21❤4

19 Sept 2026, 14:22 UTC≈4,490 views4 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

【放弃生成式对话:Jev 正在重塑 Agent 的决策骨架】 TypeSafe 推出的 Jev 并非用于聊天,而是专门处理非结构化输入到类型化决策的转换。它通过 Noul、Choice 和 Score 三种原语,在单次请求中并行处理多个原子判断。输入成本为每百万 Token 0.042 美元,输出符合预定义的类型约束,杜绝了模型乱吐字符导致程序崩溃的风险。 开发者应当把复杂逻辑拆解为看一眼就能判的微小任务,利用代码逻辑而非提示词工程来组合结果。这种做法将决策权从模型黑盒收回到确定性的程序逻辑中。置信度字段为自动化流程提供了分层依据:高置信度任务直连执行,低置信度任务触发人工复核。 尽管官方数据亮眼,但实际应用中仍需针对特定业务校准阈值,防止模型以高置信度给出错误答案。

❤4

19 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,980 views3 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Video

Qwen 发布全新 Qwen3.8‑Omni‑Flash:首款原生 omni‑modal、具备“感知→推理→工具执行”闭环的 agent 模型,能同时理解音视频并编排多步工作流(如自动剪辑 Vlog、短视频翻译、影片摘要);支持 1M 令牌长上下文、在 OmniVideoBench 用 51.8% 更少令牌定位关键片段、较 Qwen3.5‑Omni‑Plus 视频输入成本降约 89%,在 WildClawBench‑MM 与 UniClawBench 上平均领先 +19.5 点;同时开源 Qwen‑MM‑Plugins,便于把模型接入现有 agent 生态,适合需要长视频理解与可执行工作的生产化场景。

❤3

19 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,510 viewsread 27 September 2026
Photo

史记知识库:将《史记》57万字以AI驱动的知识工程重构为可交互的语义网:14,000+实体、3,198条事件、126,000+次标注、130条动态图谱与20,000+篇Wiki页面;采用可复用的“SKILL”管线与Butler Agent持续反思修正,开放源码与CC BY‑NC‑SA数据许可,既是学术级方法论与工具集,也是创作与教学的历史素材引擎。

19 Sept 2026, 14:12 UTC≈2,500 views1 reactionsread 27 September 2026
Photo

Jev-cu:一个以「类型安全」为核心的桌面交互决策引擎(俗称「Jev Use」),能从界面文字候选中选取元素、动作并评估完成度与风险,由 Codex 负责读取界面并执行;仅传文字不传截图,本地策略门槛拦截删除/支付/授权等敏感操作,默认 dry-run,支持离线评测与单元测试,提供可安装的 skill、调用脚本与 AX 快照用例,适合希望把“下一步点哪儿”交给可信自动化决策系统的团队。 源码与说明: Sac-Y/Jev-cu/blob/38fb31de7dfe6209bbe6e04057c00c6e885ba577/scripts/jev-decide.mjs Sac-Y/Jev-cu/blob/38fb31de7dfe6209bbe6e04057c00c6e885ba577/README.md

❤1

19 Sept 2026, 13:54 UTC≈1,800 viewsread 26 September 2026
Photo

【机器人学的范式转移:从喂数据到自动化工程】 加州大学伯克利分校的 Ken Goldberg 教授近期指出,代理机器人学(Agentic Robotics)正在重塑行业路径。 这一方法不再执着于采集海量物理演示数据,也不再依赖工程师手动调参,而是利用多智能体 AI 系统在离线状态下自主编写、测试并迭代机器人控制程序。核心框架 Graph-as-Policy 将复杂的控制逻辑拆解为模块化图结构,配合 GPT-6 Astra 等模型展现出的逆向物理推断能力,AI 仅凭一段视频就能在模拟器中还原摩擦力、质量等物理参数,实现从真实到模拟再回真实的闭环优化。 目前该技术已在 Ambi Robotics 的工业分拣任务中完成部署,生成的轻量化代码可直接运行于 ROS2 系统。这一转变标志着机器人开发正从概率拟合转向结构化工程的自动化。 过去行业长期受困于物理数据稀缺与模拟器失真,而代理机器人学通过将控制问题转化为编程问题,让 AI …

Showing the 12 most recent of 185 posts we hold for @piracy6. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@piracy6 edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
12 September 2026
Most recent edit
12 September 2026

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

在花🎗️科技圈
@zaihuapd · 283,183
#1
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 163,238
#2
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563
#3
Course Combination
@hodonote · 4,262
#4
每日消费电子观察
@CE_Observe · 75,036
#5
极客分享
@geekshare · 64,804
#6
MJJ出征
@wearemjj · 9,587
#7
Yummy 😋
@GodlyNews1 · 69,298
#8
心灵魔法站
@personal_hub · 11,556
#9
LoopDNS资讯播报
@DNSPODT · 72,064
#10
Solidot
@solidot · 47,568
#11
ahhhhfs|A姐分享
@abskoop · 306,126
#12
扫地僧º笔记
@lover_links · 19,706
#13
蓝点网订阅频道
@landiansub · 45,199
#14
黑科技软件资源分享
@kkaifenxiang · 260,900
#15
少数派sspai
@sspai · 38,286
#16
层叠 - The Cascading
@outvivid · 9,009
#17
小声读书 🙈
@weekly_books · 38,219
#18
你不知道的内幕消息🅥
@inside1024 · 107,720
#19
VPS信号旗播报
@vps_xhq · 49,725
#20
今天abc看了啥🤔
@abcthoughts · 6,944
#21
AI探索指南
@aigc1024 · 37,130
#22
每日沙雕墙
@woshadiao · 115,194
#23
APPDO 数字生活指南
@AppDoDo · 40,725
#24
树洞🌳群友问❓有点意思🗳
@qunyouwen · 89,267
#25
螺莉莉的黑板报
@im_RORIRI · 3,838
#26
主机百科资讯分享
@zhujiwiki_info · 10,674
#27
Appinn Feed|小众软件
@appinnfeed · 33,556
#28
即刻精选
@jike_collection · 35,824
#29
科技&趣闻&杂记
@kejiqu · 36,473
#30
Widget🏂软件工具资源分享
@WidgetChannel · 100,285
#31
网络安全笔记
@tsecrecord · 7,910
#32
不周的生活观察
@buzhouxiansheng · 6,916
#33
AI Copilot
@AI_Copilot_Channel · 10,705
#34
ChatGPT 精选
@AwesomeChatGPT · 15,061
#35
灵车漂移
@Hearse_Drifting · 10,576
#36
AppSnitch · 器
@app_snitch · 3,417
#37
cnBeta.COM中文业界资讯站 - 总频道(精选新闻)
@cnbeta_com · 27,529
#38
互联网从业者充电站
@https1024 · 30,798
#39
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,814
#40
渗透/安全推送中心
@cvebird · 4,868
#41
你有一个打折需要了解
@SteamNy · 16,187
#42
TG大学堂/得到课程分享(预览)
@coursestogether · 22,332
#43
微信搬运工
@wxbyg · 19,469
#44
Λ-Reading ♡
@GoReading · 15,210
#45
浮生东京
@LifeJapan · 7,426
#46
特价VPS分享
@Tjjcfx · 17,854
#47
隐私中国 Dark Web Inform
@CN_Privacy · 16,727
#48
Roller | ChatGPT Astra 中文社区
@rollerrolling · 8,567
#49
 Apple Nuts
@AppleNuts · 37,006
#50
Surge & Loon & QX 脚本收集
@NobyDa · 63,570
#51
竹新社
@tnews365 · 164,267
#52
不存在的世界
@illusory_world · 10,974
#53
gledos Lia green 的微型博客
@gledos_microblogging · 6,631
#54
LetITFly News
@LetITFlyW · 9,586
#55
笔记本:Lin's 文字世界 : 个人见闻/B站视频/网络见闻
@LinsBookA · 8,031
#56
青鸟的频道
@bluebird_channel · 7,915
#57
Karen医生の日常
@KarenMoeMoe · 9,385
#58
飛蛾書庫
@MothLib · 34,658
#59
豆瓣精选
@douban_read · 35,976
#60
Foolish TraceWind
@FoolishTraceWind · 16,632
#61

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 19 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

📖Telegram数字图书馆
@TG_book_data · 30,414
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 8 September 2026
PPbuzz | PP分享🧚
@ppbuzz_pro · 37,520
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 1 September 2026
黑科技软件资源分享
@kkaifenxiang · 260,900
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 39 here — alongside 38 others — read 19 August 2026
ahhhhfs|A姐分享
@abskoop · 306,126
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 17 August 2026
极客分享
@geekshare · 64,804
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 21 August 2026
油油の科技软件资源分享
@youyousharechannel · 90,145
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 43 here — alongside 42 others — read 17 August 2026
Appinn Feed|小众软件
@appinnfeed · 33,556
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 4 September 2026
小声读书 🙈
@weekly_books · 38,219
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 31 August 2026
ChatGPT / AI新闻聚合
@AI_News_CN · 22,071
Telegram ranks this channel #18 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 22 September 2026
Widget🏂软件工具资源分享
@WidgetChannel · 100,285
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 44 here — alongside 43 others — read 17 August 2026
外滩读书会-最新报纸、杂志、财经报告及流行电子书分享
@readingclubus · 29,128
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 41 here — alongside 40 others — read 8 September 2026
桔梗书屋
@JGBOOK · 21,214
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 34 here — alongside 33 others — read 24 September 2026
少数派sspai
@sspai · 38,286
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 31 August 2026
Iyouport
@iyouport · 27,814
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 10 September 2026
Newlearnerの自留地
@NewlearnerChannel · 67,563
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 62 here — alongside 61 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 15 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

8 domains this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

x.com4 posts · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
github.com3 posts · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
www.reddit.comregistrable domain: reddit.com2 posts · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
artificialanalysis.ai1 post · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
brevio.pro1 post · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
platform.claude.comregistrable domain: claude.com1 post · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
drive.google.comregistrable domain: google.com1 post · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post
karimjedda.com1 post · 26 July 2026 – 26 July 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“黑洞资源笔记” (@piracy6), 77,423 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/piracy6.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.