Channel
@tesla_drifting
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,524subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001164785279 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tesla_drifting |
| Created | 21 April 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tesla_drifting |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:01 | 1,524 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:31 | 1,527 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:22 | 1,527 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 2 August 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
243 reactions across 13 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 69 | 28.4% | |
| 🤡 | 51 | 21.0% | |
| 🥴 | 38 | 15.6% | |
| 🔥 | 32 | 13.2% | |
| 😱 | 13 | 5.35% | |
| ❤ | 12 | 4.94% | |
| 👻 | 9 | 3.70% | |
| 🙊 | 7 | 2.88% | |
| 😇 | 5 | 2.06% | |
| 🙏 | 4 | 1.65% | |
| 🍾 | 1 | 0.412% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 0.412% | |
| 🤷♂ | 1 | 0.412% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 243reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2025 to 4 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
特斯拉Cybertruck电子门把手故障致19岁女子被困车内烧死 19岁的Krysta Tsukahara家属对特斯拉提起过失致死诉讼，指控其Cybertruck"危险缺陷"的门把手设计导致女儿被困在燃烧车辆内死亡。2024年11月，一辆载有三名乘客的Cybertruck在加州皮埃蒙特撞树，司机和一名乘客当场死亡。诉讼称Tsukahara在后座仅受轻伤并幸存，但车辆随后起火，电子门系统因断电失效，她无法逃脱最终死于烟雾吸入和烧伤。 Cybertruck没有传统门把手，需按下门柱按钮并持钥匙才能开门，车内也需按按钮推门才能出去。虽有手动释放拉线，但位置隐蔽在后门地图袋底部橡胶垫下。近月来特斯拉电子门把手困人事件频发，美国国家公路交通安全管理局已展开调查。 The Verge 🍀在花频道 🍵茶馆 📮投稿
🔥25🙏4🤡2❤1👍1
浮华暂借问: https://jandan.net/t/5993812 OO: 142 XX: 2 猫仙生: 身手真敏捷 OO: 53, XX: 0 蛋友e63b64bec06ee: 无人驾驶，高科技呀 OO: 35, XX: 0 油腻中年男: 跟上前面那辆白色面包车 收到 OO: 23, XX: 0
👻9❤1
一个2262: https://jandan.net/t/5990135 OO: 153 XX: 28 akiha: 没有重罚只有偏袒，这类事只会越来越多 OO: 177, XX: 0 俺是耕田的: 女性友好社会是这样子的 OO: 101, XX: 2 夜无痕: 只能说停导流线上比停路中间好一点。但是这不就是高架吗，那么多出口随便找个出口到停车位上休息一会儿不行？非要在这地方扭腰？ OO: 59, XX: 0 蛋友e5e86b0c424ec: 高速上有服务区，城市道路更不用说到处都有停车场，再不济你违停在人少路段的路边不行吗？ OO: 9, XX: 1 JIN: 大家怎么都把别人想的这么坏，我们要学会包容和关怀，或许她是神经病发作呢 OO: 6, XX: 0
❤2
Video, posted without a caption
🤡13😇5🔥4
Video, posted without a caption
😱13
[笑cry] 新能源汽车头顶的这些激光雷达，的确是摄像头的杀手 这个MPV刚过去之后，地下车库的监控就被激光彻底杀死了
🥴38🔥3🍾1
界车是这样的
本来以为现实版农夫与蛇已经很多了，想不到还能再来一个汽车版农夫与蛇。。。。 瑟瑟发抖啊，但要明确和车没关系，不希望被带节奏[淡淡的] source
❤6
这波，甚至都把理想的AI大模型的信源污染了…. 理想AI大模型说100个车位的停车场能停两辆理想，入口一辆出口一辆….
😁43🤡4
理想车主交作业😅
🤡26
搜狐新闻惹到小仙女，摊上事了[允悲] 辣眼睛🙈谨慎点开
🤡3
【#遭亮证男子将和官方及女司机见面协商#】#官方称亮证女司机身份已查清#8月2日，“会车遇奔驰女司机亮证逼迫让路，派出所民警上门要求删帖道歉”一事持续引发热议。2日下午，广西防城港市政府相关负责人向澎湃新闻表示，公众最为关心的涉事奔驰车女司机身份已查清楚，结果很快由市里统一对外发布。 防城港市政府相关负责人还称，他已通过电话分别与涉事双方当事人沟通过，无论是地方党委政府，还是公安机关，都会严格依法依规开展调查，务必给广大网民一个公正透明、令人信服的答复。网友“平头哥”期待的纪委部门是否参与调查？前述负责人明确表示“都在其中”。 此外，网友“平头哥”向澎湃新闻证实，他即将和防城港市政府相关负责人以及奔驰女司机见面协商处理此事。
😁16🤷♂1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tesla_drifting. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,013,891 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“灵车漂移 ～ 波音 ver. ～” (@tesla_drifting), 1,524 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tesla_drifting.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.