情报是真的?! 万万没想到,世界被一根管不住的几把改变 https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-ceo-transition
🤯56😁5

Channel
@microblock_pub
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
16,066subscribers
+1,475 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001853633861 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @microblock_pub |
| Description | 发一些好玩的 现在成 mb 的私人频道了 本频道不对消息真实性做任何保证,真假自辩 Links t.me/Rosmontis_Daily t.me/PDChinaNews |
| Created | 6 June 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 66 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/microblock_pub |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 67% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Nov 2026, 00:09 | 16,066 | +18 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 01:51 | 16,048 | -5 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 18:09 | 16,053 | +28 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 13:38 | 16,025 | +14 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 15:37 | 16,011 | +37 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 13:19 | 15,974 | +42 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 15:47 | 15,932 | +8 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 15:59 | 15,924 | +7 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 18:31 | 15,917 | +13 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:59 | 15,904 | +14 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 15,890 | +11 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 20:06 | 15,879 | +14 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 16:46 | 15,865 | +15 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 17:29 | 15,850 | +16 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 16:55 | 15,834 | +19 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 19:20 | 15,815 | +22 |
| 25 Oct 2026, 17:08 | 15,793 | +27 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 16:16 | 15,766 | +20 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 18:47 | 15,746 | +19 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 20:27 | 15,727 | first reading |
99 posts held, back to 25 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 73 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 99 (25 July 2026 – 12 November 2026) |
| Views total | 165,710 |
| Reactions total | 2,438 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Nov 2026, 18:34 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
9,456 reactions across 99 posts, in 38 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 16.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🤣 | 1,524 | 16.1% | |
| 😁 | 1,073 | 11.3% | |
| 🥰 | 1,027 | 10.9% | |
| 😇 | 864 | 9.14% | |
| 🤯 | 697 | 7.37% | |
| 😭 | 584 | 6.18% | |
| 🔥 | 580 | 6.13% | |
| 🤓 | 548 | 5.80% | |
| 🙏 | 272 | 2.88% | |
| 👍 | 194 | 2.05% | |
| 🌚 | 192 | 2.03% | |
| 👾 | 189 | 2.00% | |
| 🙉 | 167 | 1.77% | |
| 😡 | 164 | 1.73% | |
| 🤝 | 164 | 1.73% | |
| 🐳 | 152 | 1.61% | |
| 🤪 | 111 | 1.17% | |
| ✍ | 110 | 1.16% | |
| 😨 | 105 | 1.11% | |
| 🗿 | 87 | 0.92% | |
| 18 further kinds | 652 | 6.90% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 99 of the 99 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 9,456 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 99 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 13 of 26 posts held from the last 30 days (50.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
情报是真的?! 万万没想到,世界被一根管不住的几把改变 https://nvidianews.nvidia.com/news/nvidia-announces-ceo-transition
🤯56😁5
我老公还在里面🙉
🙉130🙈27
Photo, posted without a caption
🌚45👍3
文 / 量子位·新智元·机械之心·数字生命卡兹克·Max for AI(排名区分先后)
✍78👍10
我以前以为自己是理性的人,不会对 LLM 动真感情的。直到我遇到最近的 GPT,第一次对 LLM 产生了那么强烈的感情,难以抑制。真的,真的,好想一拳揍上去啊
🤝164✍24
https://sshhole.com/ 省流:用 musl libc 的 Linux 设备 ssh 认证绕过,musl 的 crypt() 用 "*" 表示失败,OpenSSH 又把 "*" 当真实哈希去比较,导致无密码账户在特定条件下被超长任意密码登录 真没法绷住 我还以为会有什么精妙的 pwn,这他么啥啊 这个漏洞披露网站还做挺好的,可以看看
🤯62😇8
https://sbj.cnipa.gov.cn/ 点击语言以快速在三种样式之间切换
🤣58😁6
老实赚钱,很枯燥吧?
👍52😭28
已经有一万个群友给我搬了这玩意了,说什么小米手机有后门,在后台录屏,于是逆了一下,给我整笑了 有一个默认不开的「AI 电话诈骗拦截」的功能(图三),开了以后打电话的时候会自动录音录屏,录音本地ASR以后送到云端去推理(据描述用的可信推理,云端也看不到原文,看了下就是端侧加密,还是得看他良心),然后检测到诈骗以后会弹窗提示;至于上传,弹窗上有个「标记为误报」,点了就会把视频和音频原样上传,没点就不传 比较好笑的是小米甚至是把这个功能作为卖点来宣传的,图二是红米 Note 17 Pro 的商城页截图,这个手机的商城页可能有近半的篇幅都在宣传它的 AI 反诈功能。对于给长辈买手机的人确实是一个卖点 这还是个 opt-in 的功能,开启的时候还有个隐私政策要同意 里面就说了会录屏录音什么的,况且都打开这个功能了,这是觉得它该怎么在不录屏不录音的情况下实现 AI 通话预警呢,把日期给 AI 让它算一卦? 就这都能被说成这样 中推是…
😁98👍38
共享单车,是一项起源于21世纪初的经典极限运动
😇100🔥7
?!背诵一些原题!?
😁64🤯12
https://hy.tencent.com/research/hy4 0.3¥ / 6¥ / 18¥
👍20🔥12
Showing the 12 most recent of 99 posts we hold for @microblock_pub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 27 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“橘橘橘子汁 & 🍊” (@microblock_pub), 16,066 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/microblock_pub.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.