Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

橘橘橘子汁 & 🍊

@microblock_pub

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

14,715subscribers

+124 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001853633861
TypeChannel
Username@microblock_pub
Created6 June 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/microblock_pub

Growth

14,59114,71514,6536 August 2026 — 14,591 subscribers6 August 2026 — 14,591 subscribers7 August 2026 — 14,609 subscribers8 August 2026 — 14,619 subscribers9 August 2026 — 14,631 subscribers10 August 2026 — 14,644 subscribers11 August 2026 — 14,664 subscribers12 August 2026 — 14,675 subscribers13 August 2026 — 14,715 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +124. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,572–14,734 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 06:3714,715+40
12 Aug 2026, 08:5214,675+11
11 Aug 2026, 07:2114,664+20
10 Aug 2026, 07:4414,644+13
9 Aug 2026, 06:1114,631+12
8 Aug 2026, 03:1314,619+10
7 Aug 2026, 04:3414,609+18
6 Aug 2026, 04:5014,591no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:2114,591first reading

Engagement

33 posts held, back to 25 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
34.9%
avg views ÷ 14,715 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,140
33 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.80%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
33
of 33 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 12 August 2026
Posts held33 (25 July 202612 August 2026)
Views total169,660
Reactions total3,050
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Aug 2026, 01:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2s
Average length
2s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

3,050 reactions across 33 posts, in 23 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 20.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣62720.6%
🥰44814.7%
😇41513.6%
😭37412.3%
😁2317.57%
🤯2147.02%
🔥2136.98%
👌722.36%
👾662.16%
🤪632.07%
🐳612.00%
🎉561.84%
🤓561.84%
🙊321.05%
🥴311.02%
👍300.984%
👨‍💻270.885%
🙈110.361%
😢80.262%
🍓60.197%
3 further kinds90.295%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 33 of the 33 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,050reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 33 most recent posts we hold, published 25 July 2026 to 12 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Aug 2026, 16:18 UTC≈2,680 views60 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

以及 有人截图了!.jpg

🎉56👍4

12 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,780 views33 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

我去 不对 怎么是 4.6 High xhigh 在哪??w(゚Д゚)w 我出现幻觉了吗 Grok 要飞升成圣了吗 这就是 Grok Build 上传整个 Codebase 的收益吗(x 就是比较好玩的是 除了 cursorbench 上有 Grok 4.6 xhigh,其它报告里完全没提有这个 effort,定制榜来了 堪比软科排名 https://cursor.com/cn/cursorbench

🤯32😱1

12 Aug 2026, 15:46 UTC≈3,060 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🤯42😁21

12 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC≈1,520 views45 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

DeepSWE 没刷过 Grok 要沦为梁子了吗... 先用用看 怎么这么一会发了一大堆的模型

😭45

12 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,480 views29 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Cybergym 跑到 SOTA 了说是 该抓紧用的其实是 GPT,看起来马上要重置了.jpg

🙊27👨‍💻2

12 Aug 2026, 15:34 UTC≈1,790 views51 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

🐋! 我说 ds 真是跟随原神发版有没有懂的

🔥33🐳18

12 Aug 2026, 09:29 UTC≈2,240 views63 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰603

12 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC≈1,970 views67 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

中国人能飞 黄皮肤才对

🤓56🤯11

11 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈2,560 views64 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

今天 CDN 变茶壶了,特此记录 好像是因为腾讯云海外 CNAME 解析到了海外节点,但是我又没开海外,于是查不到域名配置,就 418 了;我强制指定了一下 IP 就修好了 还是我第一次生产里看见 Teapot,很有纪念意义了( 茶壶镇楼

👾58🍓6

11 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC≈2,380 views50 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Stealing Reasoning Traces from Proprietary LLM APIs https://arxiv.org/abs/2608.09867 之前还在说如果用 Prompt 引导模型输出 CoT 不是双倍甚至三倍成本,结果怎么这玩意各等级模型用的加密 Key 是一样的,还很凑巧的 OAG 三家都是,这下成本≈0了 谁之前跟我说不一样的,恼,我都没去试;不过还是下意识的觉得三家不会搞出这种弱智错误,缺乏想象力了有点,老了!

🔥43👍7

11 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC≈3,000 views116 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

😭105🙈11

11 Aug 2026, 10:03 UTC≈3,290 views101 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰91😁10

Showing the 12 most recent of 33 posts we hold for @microblock_pub. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 8,572 of 1,169,250entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Universe Observer
@the_universe_observer · 18
2 posts
今天abc看了啥🤔
@abcthoughts · 6,789
1 post
未題名の四月と海
@acherkrau · 2,512
1 post
青祢的垃圾堆
@adproqwq · 262
1 post
我喜欢你
@bakaPD · 9,752
1 post
Bboysoul的博客
@bboyapp · 1,541
1 post
blog@0i7
@blog_0i7 · 54
1 post
Cherr panic
@cherr_panic · 122
1 post
cHiCkEn'S dAiLy
@chickensdaily · 187
1 post
酷安名言收录
@coolapk_saying · 67
1 post
豆包AI
@dou_bao_AI · 20
1 post
Te1egram N0w
@DurovCum · 61
1 post
damm 的 eSIM 基地通知专用
@eSIMhelp · 17,293
1 post

@GrassEverywhere · 18
1 post
HanakoのPlayground☄️
@hnkchan · 441
1 post
你们这软件怎么用啊
@how_to_use_app · 767
1 post
iBug Thought �
@iBugThought · 1,224
1 post
〄FW
@JISFW · 12,727
1 post
剧终的碎碎念
@juzhossn · 994
1 post
青花鱼Board
@kot4ri_Channel · 849
1 post
Laoself 🫈
@Laoself · 2,977
1 post
老周部落运营中心
@laozhoubuluo_opcenter · 618
1 post
浅影随想
@lightFantasy · 1,431
1 post
乱七八糟の日常
@lufsxdaily · 38
1 post
洛洛の日常记录
@luotianyi_233 · 382
1 post
💊今天份的微软药丸
@macroshit · 1,785
1 post
🐱MiaoTony's Box | 困困困 zzz
@MiaoTonyChannel · 1,823
1 post
Mmis 的雜七雜八蒐藏簿
@mmis_channel · 27
1 post
沙雕体验馆
@moyush_pics · 361
1 post
Nanase的随记
@nanaselog · 3,998
1 post
DEV Save & Load 🤯
@PatriciaBySamHou · 8
1 post
QIN2DIM's Tech Channel
@qin2dim · 374
1 post
RoutineScope
@routinescope · 20
1 post
笆の碎碎念
@sanba_heartfeltwords · 85
1 post
老王无聊抽风发的
@sayforsblaowang · 212
1 post
盐酸乙酰胆碱
@teb1e · 519
1 post
733 Tech Tips (Public)
@tech_tips_733 · 304
1 post
今日份的豆酱
@today_bean · 2,869
1 post
/dev/null [SFW]
@webpack_exports_undefined · 23
1 post
每日沙雕墙 Ⅱ
@woshadiaoo · 605
1 post

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

科技圈🎗在花频道📮
@zaihuapd · 274,449
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 40 here — alongside 39 others — read 12 August 2026
风向旗参考快讯
@xhqcankao · 157,320
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 45 here — alongside 44 others — read 12 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“橘橘橘子汁 & 🍊” (@microblock_pub), 14,715 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/microblock_pub.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.