Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

VPN Guild

@vpnguild

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

96subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002605161383
TypeChannel
Username@vpnguild
DescriptionProfessional guild of VPN providers - https://vpnguild.org/ 🛡️Empowering Secure and Open Internet Access via VPN technologies
Created16 April 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/vpnguild

Growth

967 August 2026 — 96 subscribers9 August 2026 — 96 subscribers7 August 20269 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 2 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 95–97 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 12:3096no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:3796first reading

Engagement

9 posts held, back to 16 April 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 9 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 December 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
1
Links
6

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 8 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1327.1%
1122.9%
🍾612.5%
🥱612.5%
🤬510.4%
😁48.33%
🔥36.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 9 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 9 most recent posts we hold, published 16 April 2025 to 16 December 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Dec 2025, 17:04 UTC310 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Statement of VPN Guild on Blocking of VLESS Protocol in Russia Russia’s attempt to block the VLESS protocol marks another step in its campaign against online privacy and uncensored access. But despite alarming headlines, VLESS and other privacy tools continue to evolve. This statement outlines what happened, and why it matters for the citizens' rights and the means to protect their digital freedom. #vless #Privacy

5👍2

25 Sept 2025, 16:16 UTC325 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

🔒 Defend VPNs = Defend Rights 🌍 Today we join the global #DefendVPNs Day of Action. https://www.defendvpns.com VPNs are not loopholes — they’re lifelines for safety, free expression, and access to information. Full statement by the VPN Guild: https://vpnguild.org/vpn-guild-statement-in-support-of-the-global-defend-vpns-day-of-action ⸻ ⚖️ What we ask: 👩‍⚖️ Lawmakers: • Affirm VPN legality • Apply strict necessity

👍31

12 Sept 2025, 15:08 UTC297 views7 reactionsread 9 August 2026
File

Telegram thanks us for joining the call to reverse Nepal’s Telegram ban. 🙌

4👍2🔥1

2 Aug 2025, 17:25 UTC327 views4 reactionsread 9 August 2026

VPN Guild's Statement on Russian ‘Law Against Googling’ The recent adoption of ‘Law Against Googling’ (No. 755710-8) in Russia represents a troubling escalation in digital censorship, significantly impacting internet freedom, privacy rights, and online security. While not explicitly banning VPN usage outright, the law criminalizes advertising VPN services, imposes substantial fines for refusing cooperation with auth

👍4

25 Jun 2025, 15:37 UTC308 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Russian authorities are pressuring Western corporations to make life easier for Kremlin censorship by removing VPNs from their platforms. But thankfully, there are some measures users can take to circumvent these restrictions. https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2025/06/24/western-tech-companies-are-capitulating-to-russian-censors-heres-how-russians-can-fight-back-a89349

👍2🔥21

20 May 2025, 10:04 UTC348 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Russia escalates its war on digital privacy. Over 100 VPN apps have vanished from Russian app stores, including AdGuard VPN, amid mounting pressure from Roskomnadzor. Tech giants like Apple, Samsung, Xiaomi, and Huawei are complying with takedown demands, raising alarm among privacy advocates. Experts warn this is a clear attempt to tighten internet censorship and cut citizens off from uncensored information. https

🤬4😁2

13 May 2025, 14:57 UTC299 views1 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Forwarded from @Bell_tech

Технорассылка: как Apple и Google стали проводниками интернет-цензуры в России НАСТОЯЩИЙ МАТЕРИАЛ (ИНФОРМАЦИЯ) ПРОИЗВЕДЕН И РАСПРОСТРАНЕН ИНОСТРАННЫМ АГЕНТОМ THE BELL, ЛИБО КАСАЕТСЯ ДЕЯТЕЛЬНОСТИ ИНОСТРАННОГО АГЕНТА THE BELL. 18+ За последние месяцы из App Store и Google Play в России исчезли сотни VPN-сервисов. Причем удаляли их, по требованию Роскомнадзора, сами бигтехи. Вместе с Саркисом Дарбиняном, киберадвокато

🤬1

16 Apr 2025, 15:35 UTC614 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Today our website was blocked by the Russian authorities. We know how much Roskomnadzor does not like VPN, the most armor-piercing technology for protecting privacy and access to information. Probably, the censorship agency would prefer that ordinary people who find themselves behind the wall of censorship in the country of mass digital surveillance did not have such technology at all. But it does exist, and people

🍾6🥱6😁2

Showing the 9 most recent of 9 posts we hold for @vpnguild. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“VPN Guild” (@vpnguild), 96 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/vpnguild.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.