https://www.instagram.com/p/Db-YWgYjYO2/?igsh=ODB3MzFzYTcyaDlr 晚間分析..今晚8點半ppi
❤5🔥1

Channel
@futureronin168
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,795subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 13 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001346187400 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @futureronin168 |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 13 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/futureronin168 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 04:15 | 3,795 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:15 | 3,794 | no change |
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:04 | 3,794 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 10 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 13 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (10 August 2026 – 13 August 2026) |
| Views total | 11,195 |
| Reactions total | 370 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 10:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
370 reactions across 20 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 179 | 48.4% | |
| 👍 | 158 | 42.7% | |
| 🔥 | 33 | 8.92% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 370reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 10 August 2026 to 13 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
https://www.instagram.com/p/Db-YWgYjYO2/?igsh=ODB3MzFzYTcyaDlr 晚間分析..今晚8點半ppi
❤5🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
❤7👍4🔥2
港期今早係預計走勢之內,於25200水平出現支持,並且回升25400水平。短線有望進一步轉強,下午以25400水平作為分界,企穩之上維持睇好,目標25600水平前。 下午分水區域 25374-25446 向上目標 25520/25582/25640 向下目標 25361/25313/25247
❤9👍5🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍14❤2🔥1
CPI出爐,合符市場預期,市場未有太大波動,昨晚主要市場大致都係窄幅上落。不過港期仍然係弱勢,夜期尾段再一次回落25300水平。今早先觀察向下力度,距離下方大型支持25200水平非常接近,希望可以出現強勢支持力度。 上午分水區域 25304-25371 向上目標 25399/25483/25577 向下目標 25234/25154/25089
👍16❤5🔥2
https://www.instagram.com/p/Db7z48dmXGs/?igsh=cWt4anpzamk5ejBt 晚間分析...留意8:30cpi
❤9👍3🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10❤5🔥1
正如今早所講,25600水平都未能上破的情況之下,港期繼續走弱,並完成今早三個向下目標,到達25300水平。經過短時間橫行,即市形成重要區域25316-25389,若下午再失守的話,維持睇淡,並向下睇25100-25200區域支持。 下午分水區域 25316-25389 向上目標 25419/25491/25570 向下目標 25231/25154/25060
❤10👍7🔥2
Photo, posted without a caption
👍18❤7🔥1
夜期跟隨外圍,昨晚進一步向下行,未能企穩25600水平。短線都唔適宜睇好住,今早留意25600水平反應,未能上破的話,維持睇淡,繼續向下試25300水平。 上午分水區域 25519-25605 向上目標 25658/25703/25791 向下目標 25408/25365/25300
❤22👍7🔥1
https://www.instagram.com/p/Db5QNJ-mWoy/?igsh=djk3MXVyNndtdTd3 晚間分析
❤11👍3🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
👍10❤5🔥4
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @futureronin168. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,421,663 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“期貨浪人廣播台” (@futureronin168), 3,795 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/futureronin168.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.