Channel
@CivilHumanRightsFront
On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cross-platform identity · Cite this entry
17,882subscribers
-51 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001416476568 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @CivilHumanRightsFront |
| Description | 民陣被捕法律支援熱線：6549 9452 Whatsapp / SMS / Telegram 請提供資料： 1. 被捕地點 2. 中文全名 3. 英文全名 4. 身份證號碼 5. 所在警署 6. 性別 7. 年齡 8. 緊急聯絡人電話 9. 報料人電話（如與 8. 有不同） 10. 其他詳情 ——— 民陣 Facebook fb.com/CivilHumanRightsFront |
| Created | 11 June 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/CivilHumanRightsFront |
Recorded in 2019 as “民間人權陣線資訊頻道” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 10:05 | 17,882 | -4 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 09:44 | 17,886 | -10 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 07:55 | 17,896 | -3 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 07:47 | 17,899 | -7 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 10:11 | 17,906 | -9 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 13:34 | 17,915 | -3 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 17,918 | -15 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:52 | 17,933 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:40 | 17,933 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 26 August 2020 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 19 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 March 2021. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
回應被指收取美國捐款及被取締聲明 民間人權陣線成立至今，從未有收取任何外國政府或機構資助，包括：美國國家民主基金會。而民陣資金運作上，一直只依靠遊行集會期間廣大市民的捐款。 因此，對有消息指我們被調查曾否獲美國資助，以及涉違反國安法，民陣表示不明所以，並且呼籲各界認清真相。 另外，就有消息指民陣有機會被政府取締一事，我們表示欲加之罪，何患無辭！呼籲港人在不斷打壓的情況下，做自己能做的事。 民間人權陣線召集人 陳皓桓 #祝各位平安 #五大訴求 #缺一不可 [Statement in Response to Allegations of American Funding and Disbandment] Since the founding of the Civil Human Rights Front (CHRF), we have never received any sort of funding from fo…
【47 人案是一場政變】 民陣召集人陳皓桓： 政權以《國安法》控告初選參選人已經好荒謬，更要面對幾日馬拉松式審訊折磨。希望所有香港人堅持自己信念，唔好放棄民主自由公義，係原則亦都係底線。正如被告離開法庭時，大叫「香港人加油，撐住！」希望大家都能夠做到。 最後，被告們呢幾日透過新聞見到咁多香港人到法院聲援，覺得非常鼓舞，代每一位家屬感謝大家支持。 由動用《國安法》到更改參選條件，顛覆人民選擇，今次政府行動係一場政變，民間人權陣線絕不認同。政府應該立即回應人民訴求，呢個係 200 萬曾走上街頭、60 萬曾參與初選市民嘅信念。 — 梁國雄太太陳寶盈： 今日審訊結果係預料之內。《國安法》設立之後，司法制度完全扭曲顛倒，過去法官認為衡量被告會否違反保釋條件及潛逃風險，決定可否保釋，現在卻要法官信納被告唔會繼續進行所謂違法行為。 今日所有被告都願意接受嚴苛保釋條件，律師代表亦好清楚講到律政司控告材料薄弱，但最後大部份人仍然不…
「47名民主派初選人士被起訴案件」中，有15人獲准保釋： 1⃣鄭達鴻 2⃣楊雪盈 3⃣彭卓祺 4⃣何啟明 5⃣劉偉聰 6⃣黃碧雲 7⃣譚文豪 8⃣施德來 9⃣張可森 🔟伍健偉 1⃣1⃣郭家麒 1⃣2⃣呂智恆 1⃣3⃣林景楠 1⃣4⃣柯耀林 1⃣5⃣李予信 ⚠️保釋條件受香港法律限制未能披露。 #香港新聞
#西九龍裁判法院第一庭 #蘇惠德總裁判官 #指定法官 #港區國安法 #初選47人 1951 開庭 說好的1900開庭呢？ 1952 D1:戴耀廷 TAI, YIU TING 撤回擔保申請，放棄八天 1953 由於控方申請押後至5月31日以作出調查，並反對所有被告保釋申請。法庭需考慮蒐證進度、案件嚴重性複雜性等；法庭批准控方申請押後，潘資深指得悉部份律師5月31日未能出席，書記指最快6月7日有期。 1955 最終決定押後本案5月31日於西九三庭再訊。 1956 法庭考慮過案情、控辯陳詞、各被告陳詞後： 1957 D8 10 11 14 16 17 20 24 26 28 30 40 42 43 46，共15位批准保釋，先讀出適用於上述被告的四項擔保條件（後補）及以下： 需交出所有旅遊證件及BNO 宵禁24-07 D10 三天、其餘四天 警署報到 D8 10萬+100萬人事擔保 D10 8萬+2名擔保人各4萬 D10…
民間人權陣線 對1月6日國安法大搜捕的聲明 Civil Human Rights Front’s Statement on The Great Purge English Statement http://bit.ly/3nkl6Ib 今天，警方以涉嫌觸犯「港區國安法」為名，於清晨大肆拘捕曾參加於2019年舉行的民主派初選中，超過50名香港民主派人士，其中包括前立法會議員、現任區議員、醫生、律師。警方更藉法庭手令，搜查被捕人士所屬的律師樓、醫務所、議員辦事處，及要求四個傳媒機構提供與初選有關的交易詳情。但警方所持的執法理據，僅為倡議初選者及部分候選人曾提及否決財政預算案，以令政府須根據基本法重選立法會及行政長官。 根據《香港特別行政區基本法》第73條（二）：立法會可根據政府的提案，審核、通過財政預算案。審核權自然包含否決權。而根據《基本法》第52條（三），亦有列明行政長官在立法會拒絕通過財政預算案並被解散後，而重選的立法…
1620 #香港中文大學 #警察入大學 警察及大學保安組到聯合書院胡忠圖書館外搜證。 #RTHK
1547 #香港中文大學 #警察入大學 中文大學以疫情為由，把原定昨日（19 日）舉行的畢業禮改為網上進行，不過逾百名中大學生回校發起「畢業遊行」，遊行隊伍中有人拿著「光復香港 時代革命」、「香港獨立」等旗幟，中大校方多次報警；警務處國家安全處其後接手調查。 今午元朗區議員、前中大學生會主席張秀賢在 facebook 指，警方正進入中大調查。下午 3 時半，《立場》記者在中大「四條柱」入口對出的車站見到多部警車停泊。 報導全文： https://www.facebook.com/standnewshk/photos/a.720050934747196/3660618644023729/ #立場
【團結一致 抵抗打壓】 今天，人大常委會應特首請求決議，由特區政府直接即時剝奪公民黨楊岳橋、郭榮鏗、郭家麒以及專業議政梁繼昌四人的立法會議席，民陣強烈譴責林鄭月娥政府的舉措及人大常委會的決定。同時希望不同光譜，不同主張的香港人，用不分化、不指責、不割蓆，團結一致的抗爭精神，共同反對及抵抗一切來自極權的打壓。 自反送中運動開始，來自政權的打壓從未停止，在殤十一的今日，人大決定及特區政府的公佈中可見，中共政權毫無聆聽民意的意欲，反倒更加強了無法無天、與民為敵的鐵腕統治手般。 在可見的將來，來自極權的打壓不會停止，但民陣相信只要民間社會團結一致、齊上齊落，堅持到最後，在黑暗中努力點燃光明，人民終將會得到應得的權利和自由！ 民間人權陣線 2020.11.11 #五大訴求 #缺一不可
https://hk.appledaily.com/local/20200929/UMA4M5WICFG7PEIMXRFHJ7RGCU
民陣已收到警方 #反對通知書 我地會再上訴 #十一大遊行 #save12hkyouths
【我們只想見到 12 手足平安回來】 1. 尋日民陣同警方開會，我地估計獲批不反對通知書嘅機會頗低，但即使唔批，我地都會上訴到底。請大家都幫手宣傳 10.1 遊行！ 2. 同大家預告，民陣 10.1 當日會落《蘋果》廣告，大家記住買報紙帶出街！ 3. 10.1 中秋，黑衣為記，街頭見。 — 【#十一大遊行 毋忘義士 釋放十二】 日期｜10.1 中秋節 時間｜2PM 起步 路線｜東角道 至 遮打道行人專用區 【10.1 Rally: Save 12 HK Youths】 Date｜1st October, Thursday Time｜2PM Route｜East Point Rd – Chater Rd Pedestrian Precinct 【海報下載 Poster】 http://bit.ly/101rally #save12hkyouths #毋忘義士 #釋放十二 #五大訴求 #缺一不可
【#十一大遊行 毋忘義士 釋放十二】 民陣今日已向警方入紙申請不反對通知書，舉辦十一大遊行，未來幾日將會有記者會公佈詳情。 今次遊行訴求：毋忘所有受政權打壓的義士，重申五大訴求立場，並要求釋放 12 位被中方扣留手足！ 日期｜10.1 中秋節 時間｜2PM 起步 路線｜東角道 至 遮打道行人專用區 【10.1 Rally: Save 12 HK Youths】 Date｜1st October, Thursday Time｜2PM Route｜East Point Rd – Chater Rd Pedestrian Precinct *不反對通知書申請中 *Letter of No Objection Pending 【海報下載 Poster】 http://bit.ly/101rally #save12hkyouths #毋忘義士 #釋放十二 #五大訴求 #缺一不可
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @CivilHumanRightsFront. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 269,758 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A Wikidata item names this Telegram handle as belonging to the entity it describes. This is Wikidata’s claim, not a verification made by this register — nobody here confirmed that the account is genuinely operated by the entity named. Wikidata content is CC0; every fact below is dated to when it was read from Wikidata, not to when the association was first made there.
| Label | Civil Human Rights Front |
|---|---|
| Description | Hong Kong human rights organisation |
| Official site | http://www.civilhrfront.org |
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“民間人權陣線 Civil Human Rights Front” (@CivilHumanRightsFront), 17,882 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/CivilHumanRightsFront.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.