Photo, posted without a caption

Channel
慈雲山資訊公佈
@tszwanshan
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,102subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001467218477 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tszwanshan |
| Created | 15 July 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tszwanshan |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 04:01 | 1,102 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 23:54 | 1,103 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:18 | 1,102 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:04 | 1,102 | first reading |
Engagement
19 posts held, back to 3 April 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 December 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Photo, posted without a caption
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdNgyIOmHhE6IstA9KnCEJYbCFTB0tknX0_xDqVAoYdsROxNw/viewform
Netflix 數小時前把 Winter On Fire《凛冬烈火:烏克蘭為自由而戰》記錄片完整放上YouTube。身在香港或英國的用戶,無需付錢訂閱 Netflix,只需要使用以下 YouTube 連結就可以免費睇到。 由於 烏克蘭 當年抗爭的事件,與香港其後的抗爭事件相似,很多香港人在抗爭期間都經常提到此記錄片。 https://youtu.be/yzNxLzFfR5w #Netflix #YouTube #烏克蘭 #凛冬烈火 #烏克蘭為自由而戰
好人一世平安
早前尋人post 已尋回🙏🏻
【香港家書】明天將強制用「安心出行」,香港人如何再齊心「盡做」? //「安心出行」於明天正式強制在多間政府處所使用,其中街市、醫院、圖書館和小販市場,相信是最擾民之處。 「安心出行」演變至今,政府的真正意圖已經相當明顯,但並非「路人皆見」,因為你知我知,不代表你身邊的人都清楚,更不代表街上的人知。 2019 年至今,我們見識過「文宣」的力量。網絡上鋪天蓋地的「手動轉」分享信息、街上的「連儂牆」吸引大量社區人士注意,才能做到行動上「一呼百應」。 很多人仍然不清楚「安心出行」引發的私隱問題,認為「安心出行會遲早變成信用系統」都是別有用心的陰謀論。 另一方面,我們亦因為街頭運動的失敗,而忘記了個人的力量雖然微小,但每個人做多一步,「盡做」、「盡講」、「盡分享」,就能帶動輿論。 書生很記得,禁止堂食的限聚令出現不久,大量報導與輿論直斥政策的不是,令很多打工仔要在天橋公園食飯,失去尊嚴。雖然這些輿論未必能立即令政府收回政策,但…
【為工程巴送上生日祝福】 去年工程巴因網上言論,被還押將近一年半。今年是他於收押所渡過的第二個生日,將面對明年的漫長審訊過程,任誰也快樂不起。願我們再次把祝福化成文字為工程巴送上鼓勵和力量! 生日祝福請送到: @youarenotalonehk_mail2bot 截止日期:2021年10月13日 23:00 —————————————————— 歡迎大家支持工程巴嘅patreon💛 http://www.patreon.com/engineers9up Instagram:不實用Engineer's 9up
https://bit.ly/3jVYLSM
講開破窗效應 又有幾多人知琴晚禮賓府俾人燒啊? 知唔知呢啲野要有曝光率先有用嫁? 問下自己個心 接受程度有幾大 決心有幾大 定都係其實叫下口號嫁咋?
#索女admin有話兒 條片del唔del 每個channel每個page都有佢地嘅自由同決定 本台唔會干涉 亦希望 無論係channel admin 或channel讀者 尊重返手足 佢嘅行動係廣大嘅香港人都冇勇氣做嘅事 唔好再評論該手足係咪自編自導自演 又或者係鬼
2⃣ - 民眾風險注意 對象區域: 灣仔區(銅鑼灣) ⚠️警方向東角道記利佐治街的市民舉黃旗,並驅散於名店坊行街的民眾。 ⚠️注意周遭環境及個人安全。 ⚠️請繼續儘量保持社交距離。 ⚠️保持冷靜。 ⚠️民眾如需離開,請預先擬定路線。 註:其他地區維持1⃣ - 民眾風險防備 2021年07月01日1600時發出 #民眾防護系統 #公眾安全情報 #公眾交通情報
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @tszwanshan. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,324,037 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@canigosomeplacefun · 31,5342 posts手joke
@condomhandjoke · 1,9052 posts張茂清 Cheung Mau Ching
@cheungmauching · 1041 post港島東•鷹眼🦅
@easternhawkeye · 5,8751 postHackney Sunday Cafe
@HackneySundayCafe · 3931 post書生
@HKReaderXWriter · 8141 post612 Reminder
@reminder612 · 35,9151 post🐘氣象巴打🟢
@weatherjj · 43,2821 post被捕人士搜證部
@youarenotalonehk_evidence · 2,5701 post被捕人士資訊部
@youarenotalonehk_info · 7,3991 post被捕人士收信部
@youarenotalonehk_mailbox · 4,2921 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@tszwanshan named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“慈雲山資訊公佈” (@tszwanshan), 1,102 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tszwanshan.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.