Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 军事消息

Channel

军事消息

@ww3ch

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,441subscribers

+796 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001583418482
TypeChannel
Username@ww3ch
Description军情,武器,末日逃生资讯 军事讨论 @ww3talk
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/ww3ch

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,6459,4419,0436 August 2026 — 8,645 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,645 subscribers9 August 2026 — 8,661 subscribers12 August 2026 — 8,702 subscribers15 August 2026 — 8,741 subscribers18 August 2026 — 8,759 subscribers22 August 2026 — 8,802 subscribers25 August 2026 — 8,805 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,816 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,833 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,847 subscribers6 September 2026 — 8,862 subscribers11 September 2026 — 8,910 subscribers15 September 2026 — 8,990 subscribers19 September 2026 — 9,012 subscribers28 September 2026 — 9,179 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,251 subscribers12 October 2026 — 9,277 subscribers15 October 2026 — 9,263 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,287 subscribers22 October 2026 — 9,303 subscribers25 October 2026 — 9,318 subscribers28 October 2026 — 9,325 subscribers1 November 2026 — 9,362 subscribers3 November 2026 — 9,398 subscribers6 November 2026 — 9,422 subscribers9 November 2026 — 9,441 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 95 days, net +796. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,526–9,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 21:599,441+19
6 Nov 2026, 13:559,422+24
3 Nov 2026, 23:499,398+36
1 Nov 2026, 00:309,362+37
28 Oct 2026, 15:379,325+7
25 Oct 2026, 10:369,318+15
22 Oct 2026, 08:369,303+16
18 Oct 2026, 18:109,287+24
15 Oct 2026, 22:069,263-14
12 Oct 2026, 17:579,277+26
5 Oct 2026, 23:169,251+72
28 Sept 2026, 18:579,179+167
19 Sept 2026, 09:209,012+22
15 Sept 2026, 08:568,990+80
11 Sept 2026, 11:218,910+48
6 Sept 2026, 19:018,862+15
2 Sept 2026, 10:158,847+14
30 Aug 2026, 11:198,833+17
27 Aug 2026, 21:438,816+11
25 Aug 2026, 02:258,805first reading

Engagement

243 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 47 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
2.25%
avg views ÷ 9,441 subscribers
Avg views / post
213
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.274%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 243 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 10 of 56 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held243 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total11,905
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈94,700
Videos
≈31,500
Links
≈25,100

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
6m 38s
Average length
1m 06s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

35 reactions across 29 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1337.1%
❤925.7%
😱617.1%
🤮38.57%
💩12.86%
😁12.86%
😢12.86%
🤩12.86%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 36 of the 243 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 243 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 56 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 13:45 UTC85 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ 彩云香江 Side views of Chinese Navy ship-based fixed-wing combat aircraft and helicopters

10 Nov 2026, 05:41 UTC276 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ 彩云香江 Top Modern Advanced Nuclear-powered attack Submarine Classes Worldwide --------- 🗃Instant Media Bot: auto-downloads media from links posted in your group, no commands needed.

💩1

9 Nov 2026, 05:38 UTC297 views1 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ 彩云香江 PLAN CV-18 Fujian aircraft carrier

🤮1

8 Nov 2026, 21:36 UTC303 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ NiKITa🇺🇦 基輔停電期間的夜間聚會

8 Nov 2026, 21:36 UTC269 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ NiKITa🇺🇦 🇺🇸 美國國會民主黨人正準備一項總額達150億美元的對烏克蘭援助方案——《金融時報》 民主黨人計劃在新一屆國會於2027年1月開始運作後,推動這項新的援助方案。

8 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC264 viewsread 11 November 2026

✖️ Alex Chen 30多年前的历史纪录早就被打破了,人类永远在追寻更高更快更强。 30年以上前の記録はとうの昔に塗り替えられました。人類は常に、より高く、より速く、より強くあることを追い求めているのです。 Records from over 30 years ago have long since been broken; humanity is forever striving to go higher, faster, and stronger.

6 Nov 2026, 13:30 UTC425 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ 彩云香江 J-35 --------- 📥Download IT Bot: download almost any media to your mobile or computer.

5 Nov 2026, 05:27 UTC497 views0 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ 彩云香江 J20 in “Beast Mode” video FM w/b 琴石 2022

4 Nov 2026, 21:25 UTC348 viewsread 11 November 2026
Photo

✖️ NiKITa🇺🇦 🇺🇸民主黨人承諾取消特朗普的關稅,並尋求結束與伊朗的戰爭 眾議院民主黨領袖表示,該黨將在贏得中期選舉後推動相關立法倡議。 他稱與伊朗的衝突是「他自己選擇的無情戰爭」,並呼籲政府立即結束這場衝突。 ▫️在這一訊息的背景下,布倫特原油下跌了9%。

Showing the 12 most recent of 243 posts we hold for @ww3ch. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

☠️三战快报☠️一级战备
@endofxi · 22,085
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 49 here — alongside 48 others — read 23 September 2026
新闻哥头条吃瓜每日热点
@yewaiTQ · 24,955
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 20 here — alongside 19 others — read 23 September 2026
俄罗斯资讯参考频道
@JShangrong · 24,112
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 15 September 2026
美国之音
@voachinese · 42,209
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
🥗 视讯快报~密接巨变时代
@shixun160 · 22,704
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 19 September 2026
轻口味时间
@lightrekt · 48,041
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 35 here — alongside 34 others — read 25 August 2026
影音中国(中国被禁的视频)
@TwtVideoOfChina · 78,369
Telegram ranks this channel #47 of 54 here — alongside 53 others — read 20 August 2026
「VoP」維尼之聲 - Voice of Pooh🔊
@VoiceofPooh · 22,167
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 53 here — alongside 52 others — read 20 September 2026
🐘氣象巴打🟢
@weatherjj · 42,128
Telegram ranks this channel #60 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
777文宣傳播稿件大合集
@hkposter777 · 22,588
Telegram ranks this channel #66 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 20 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“军事消息” (@ww3ch), 9,441 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ww3ch.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.