Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 🀜BROTHERS CHANNELπŸ€›

Channel

🀜BROTHERS CHANNELπŸ€›

@BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1

On this record: Topic Β· Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Telegram's recommendations Β· Cite this entry

15,064subscribers

-569 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001778331613
TypeChannel
Username@BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops β€” a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 60% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured β€” it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,97815,63315,305.56 August 2026 β€” 15,633 subscribers7 August 2026 β€” 15,623 subscribers8 August 2026 β€” 15,321 subscribers9 August 2026 β€” 15,308 subscribers10 August 2026 β€” 15,100 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 15,022 subscribers12 August 2026 β€” 14,991 subscribers13 August 2026 β€” 15,425 subscribers14 August 2026 β€” 15,366 subscribers16 August 2026 β€” 15,337 subscribers17 August 2026 β€” 15,287 subscribers18 August 2026 β€” 15,205 subscribers19 August 2026 β€” 15,182 subscribers20 August 2026 β€” 15,142 subscribers21 August 2026 β€” 15,133 subscribers22 August 2026 β€” 15,075 subscribers24 August 2026 β€” 15,059 subscribers25 August 2026 β€” 15,030 subscribers26 August 2026 β€” 15,004 subscribers27 August 2026 β€” 15,299 subscribers29 August 2026 β€” 15,286 subscribers30 August 2026 β€” 15,216 subscribers31 August 2026 β€” 15,152 subscribers1 September 2026 β€” 15,085 subscribers2 September 2026 β€” 15,035 subscribers3 September 2026 β€” 14,984 subscribers5 September 2026 β€” 15,409 subscribers8 September 2026 β€” 15,219 subscribers11 September 2026 β€” 14,978 subscribers13 September 2026 β€” 15,367 subscribers14 September 2026 β€” 15,290 subscribers16 September 2026 β€” 15,149 subscribers19 September 2026 β€” 15,003 subscribers25 September 2026 β€” 15,064 subscribers15,0646 August 202625 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 50 days, net -569. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,880–15,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Sept 2026, 14:3615,064+61
19 Sept 2026, 02:5915,003-146
16 Sept 2026, 15:0115,149-141
14 Sept 2026, 18:4215,290-77
13 Sept 2026, 03:1715,367+389
11 Sept 2026, 06:3814,978-241
8 Sept 2026, 13:1815,219-190
5 Sept 2026, 04:5815,409+425
3 Sept 2026, 11:3514,984-51
2 Sept 2026, 05:2515,035-50
1 Sept 2026, 07:4615,085-67
31 Aug 2026, 10:5815,152-64
30 Aug 2026, 12:4715,216-70
29 Aug 2026, 10:3715,286-13
27 Aug 2026, 12:2815,299+295
26 Aug 2026, 11:0315,004-26
25 Aug 2026, 11:2715,030-29
24 Aug 2026, 10:0215,059-16
22 Aug 2026, 20:2615,075-58
21 Aug 2026, 11:0815,133first reading

Engagement

560 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 53 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR Β· 30 days
23.7%
avg views Γ· 15,064 subscribers
Avg views / post
3,570
159 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.34%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
201
of 560 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· views β€” note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 3 September 2026
Posts held560 (5 August 2026 – 3 September 2026)
Views total568,170
Reactions total7,626
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface β€” not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 10:58 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than β€œcorrecting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β€” 8.12K, 3.7M β€” so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β€” read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
17m 11s
Average length
34s

Measured directly from 30 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

21,769 reactions across 453 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
πŸ‘15,23170.0%
❀3,50416.1%
πŸ”₯2,40611.1%
πŸ₯°5622.58%
customΒ 5388571952174609710660.303%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id β€” no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 453 of the 560 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 21,769 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 560 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
55
across the posts below
Posts paid on
4
of 453 we hold a reading for Β· 0.9%
Most on one post
51
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β€” bought with money β€” on a post by @BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 560 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 10:18 UTCβ‰ˆ2,780 views93 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

I’m watching the stats for my next level up giveaways πŸ‘€ πŸ” https://t.me/CHUMPCOIN21B

πŸ‘56πŸ”₯21❀15πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 10:05 UTCβ‰ˆ2,890 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026

BELIEVE. πŸ”

πŸ‘78πŸ”₯3πŸ₯°3❀1

3 Sept 2026, 10:02 UTCβ‰ˆ2,760 views58 reactionsread 3 September 2026

I’m excited to see our partnership ATH broken. That’s $450m I fully believe $CHUMP will smash that out of the park. Do you ?πŸ‘‡

πŸ‘41πŸ”₯10❀6πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 09:53 UTCβ‰ˆ2,930 views76 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Nobody does partnerships better than brothers. Thats a fact.

πŸ‘64❀7πŸ”₯5

3 Sept 2026, 08:04 UTCβ‰ˆ4,520 views36 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

WHAT A FUCKING NIGHT! 😎 Coffee needed was out partying with this gangster CHUMP last night. Dude sent his chart just shy of $50m MC! What a guy! $CHUMP is a real one. He wants to meet up again tonight! Hearing talks of huge party Called CHUMP ATH! Only chump cult people allowed! We got vip of course 🍺 πŸ₯³ 🍾 πŸ” https://x.com/brothermkt/status/2095423166319411203?s=46&t=gO2-lsTdxBytgtsHygYxdQ

πŸ‘22❀7πŸ”₯6πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 01:21 UTCβ‰ˆ3,670 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026

50m lets see you then

πŸ‘37πŸ”₯4❀1πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 01:21 UTCβ‰ˆ3,560 views34 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

πŸ†•πŸ†•πŸ†•πŸ†•πŸ†• $151 CHUMP COIN BUY! πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ” ➑️ ETH: 0.06 ($151) ⬅️ CHUMP: 3K πŸ‘€ Buyer / Txn πŸ…ΏοΈ Position: NEW πŸ“ˆ Marketcap: $49.5M πŸ“ŠChart | πŸ•΅οΈ Calls |πŸ† Trending πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈTRENDING #2 on @SpyDefi

πŸ‘33πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 01:07 UTCβ‰ˆ4,000 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Main stream buying CHUMP.

πŸ‘42πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 01:07 UTCβ‰ˆ3,640 views30 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

πŸ‹πŸ‹πŸ‹πŸ‹πŸ‹ $24K CHUMP COIN BUY! πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ”πŸ” ➑️ ETH: 9.9 ($24K) ⬅️ CHUMP: 496K πŸ‘€ Buyer / Txn πŸ…ΏοΈ Position: +15% πŸ’΅ Wallet Value: $333K πŸ‘› Notable Holdings: Chump Coin ($177K), Ethereum ($157K) πŸ“ˆ Marketcap: $48.9M πŸ“ŠChart | πŸ•΅οΈ Calls |πŸ† Trending πŸ•΅οΈβ€β™‚οΈTRENDING #2 on @SpyDefi

πŸ‘29πŸ₯°1

3 Sept 2026, 00:54 UTCviews β€”

🀜BROTHERS CHANNELπŸ€› pinned Β«$CHUMP said…. JOB NOT DONE.Β»

Showing the 12 most recent of 560 posts we hold for @BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

19 Aug 2026, 20:47 UTCFinal Results20 voters

Want me to do 5 x $10 or 2x 25 or 1x 50 ?

  1. 1 x $500%
  2. 2 x 2535%
  3. 5 x 1065%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only β€” there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 560 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 3 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β€” an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β€” and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels β€” every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched β€” that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly β€” each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Gems Mine
@MineGems Β· 35,030
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here β€” alongside 76 others β€” read 4 September 2026
Maybach Calls
@MaybachCalls Β· 28,826
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 77 here β€” alongside 76 others β€” read 6 September 2026
Gubbins Calls
@gubbinscalls Β· 25,900
Telegram ranks this channel #13 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 13 September 2026
Veigar Calls
@veigarcalls Β· 25,048
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 78 here β€” alongside 77 others β€” read 14 September 2026
Gogeta Crypto Chad$
@gogetacalls Β· 67,778
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 78 here β€” alongside 77 others β€” read 30 August 2026
VenoMCalls
@venomcalls Β· 35,703
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 81 here β€” alongside 80 others β€” read 2 September 2026
- BSC -
@lowtaxbsc Β· 40,157
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 88 here β€” alongside 87 others β€” read 26 August 2026
Bruisers Calls
@bruiserscalls Β· 33,241
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 80 here β€” alongside 79 others β€” read 5 September 2026
- SOL -
@lowtaxsolana Β· 42,531
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here β€” alongside 83 others β€” read 26 August 2026
@ETHTRENDING (LIVE)
@ETHTRENDING Β· 43,836
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 77 here β€” alongside 76 others β€” read 28 August 2026
CaesarsCalls
@Caesars_Calls Β· 39,248
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 82 here β€” alongside 81 others β€” read 30 August 2026
MadApes Calls
@mad_apes_call Β· 80,345
Telegram ranks this channel #40 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 18 August 2026
Koba's Calls
@kobascalls Β· 32,020
Telegram ranks this channel #45 of 73 here β€” alongside 72 others β€” read 3 September 2026
π†πŽπ‹πƒ πƒπˆπ†π†π„π‘β€™π’ 𝐂𝐀𝐋𝐋𝐒
@golddigerscalls Β· 23,215
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 79 here β€” alongside 78 others β€” read 18 September 2026
🦁 LION CALLS 🦁 (Crypto AMAs & Reviews)
@LionCALL Β· 90,388
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 86 here β€” alongside 85 others β€” read 10 September 2026
Crypto Gems πŸš€πŸ“ˆπŸŒŸ
@cryptogems555 Β· 24,183
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 83 here β€” alongside 82 others β€” read 16 September 2026
Ryoshi Gamble
@ryoshigamble Β· 38,003
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 74 here β€” alongside 73 others β€” read 31 August 2026
🦁 LION JUNGLE βœ–οΈ by @LionCALL 🦁 (Gambles)
@LionJUNGLE Β· 33,247
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 85 here β€” alongside 84 others β€” read 10 September 2026
Maestros Gamble Degen Apes
@Maestrosdegen Β· 36,178
Telegram ranks this channel #70 of 78 here β€” alongside 77 others β€” read 1 September 2026
Mark Degens
@MarkDegens Β· 23,708
Telegram ranks this channel #80 of 81 here β€” alongside 80 others β€” read 17 September 2026

This channel appears in 20 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one β€” see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 September 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπŸ€œBROTHERS CHANNELπŸ€›β€ (@BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1), 15,064 subscribers as measured 25 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/BROTHERSMARKETINGCHANNEL1.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.