Goat spoken 🤣 https://x.com/cz_binance/status/2081316675383910587?s=46&t=Fi23NlPhbEzqFVDa7sI4xA

Channel
Bossy Callz 🇵🇸{ReBuilding Arc}
@Bossy_Callz
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
14,308subscribers
-78 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001677386684 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @Bossy_Callz |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/Bossy_Callz |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 04:38 | 14,308 | -13 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 14,321 | -14 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 02:03 | 14,335 | -11 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:35 | 14,346 | -23 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 14,369 | -13 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:07 | 14,382 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 14,386 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 17 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 7.97%
- avg views ÷ 14,308 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,140
- 20 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 20
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 26 July 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (15 July 2026 – 26 July 2026) |
| Views total | 22,815 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 13 Aug 2026, 02:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 14s
- Average length
- 14s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
Second cex to close
BitMart going byebye, don’t forget to withdraw your funds before its too late
I’m take few days off from space, and come back with fresher mind and see what we can do to change our mindsets, and if we can start running shit up again or slowly just call it a day.
Maybe I’m just getting old and tired of it who knows, but I spoken to so many old friends, that feel the same way. But 100% reason why most of us still here is because we made bad or wrong choices when we could of retired our whole bloodlines.
You know why 90% off ppl losing in crypto now? 1 - fake relationships - people who were around 2019/2022 those are the people who had fun, because ppl had very good friendship among each other. 2 - a lot of people lost their networth + become very bitter and angry towards the space, most ppl don’t even wanna be here no more, but are forced to try make it, hence why everyone is so bitter or angry. 3 - Everyone just…
Lowkey robinhood looks cooked, most coins going 80% down overnight , that noxa relaunch didn’t do anything as anticipated lucky I swang for 3x profit. But in general I think 3/5 days more we know wether robinhood is going to stay or shits gona become worst. Hopefully our saviour sol raises, seen some good plays over the last week, just haven’t traded there. Will lock in properly and focus, will try share if anythi…
Did almost 3x should be free if all goes smooth ngl.
40% up already https://x.com/noxalaunchpad/status/2079938012843008199?s=46
Also positioned a bag on their native token, surely it pump when they go live. Should be free money as long as everything goes smooth. https://dexscreener.com/robinhood/0x121adf3c5fb72be4dfc19d2921c0adbac40614cc
Lock in plenty of early opportunities coming up.
Another very reputable launchpad coming out soon. Let’s see who runs Robinhood next week, surely one launchpad will take most of mindshare.
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @Bossy_Callz. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 92,078 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
@black_spi · 1432 postsGems call rich
@channelcall · 91 postChill guy ☃️
@chillittlekid · 171 postCryptoRehab ($CRB)
@CryptoRehab_Official · 111 postFiFaSport Channel
@FiFaSportChannel · 1,0451 postHunter's Lab 👨🏻⚕️
@hunterslab · 961 postKOBE'S CALLS (Verify Me On Twitter @Kobes_Calls)
@Kobes_Calls · 911 postMafiaaCalls
@mafiaacalls · 1001 postPePay - Global Channel
@PePayChannel · 351 postPEPEVAULT | Official Announcement 🐸
@PepeVault_Ann · 4141 postSHINU Announcements
@ShinuAnn · 411 postSkynet Gems 💎
@skynet_gems · 291 postTESLAAI
@teslaai_official · 521 post
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
@callerpricelist · 941 postCryptoRehab ($CRB)
@CryptoRehab_Official · 111 postGodhortsBlockchain
@GodhortsBlockchain · 61 postMasboy YT
@indoPinksaleHunter · 71 postJoker Calls 🃏 SAFU Devs
@jokercallssafudevs · 581 postThunders Marketing (Web3)🌛
@thundersmarketing · 8961 postZkSync Chads Calls
@ZkChadsCalls · 591 post
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@CryptoHylos · 1,705,633
Telegram ranks this channel #25 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 11 August 2026
@anyclass_bodymind · 169,179
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 12 August 2026
@msk7days · 2,223,004
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 10 August 2026
@MaestroBotsHub · 172,101
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 12 August 2026
This channel appears in 4 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Bossy Callz 🇵🇸{ReBuilding Arc}” (@Bossy_Callz), 14,308 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Bossy_Callz.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.