Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Military Managers🇷🇺

@militarymanagers

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

8,794subscribers

+193 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002795627862
TypeChannel
Username@militarymanagers
DescriptionЗнать-значит выжить. ☠️ Связь: @adm_militarymanagers Мы в вк vk.com/militarymanagers, официальная страница ВК нашего ТГ канала.
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/militarymanagers

Growth

8,6018,7948,697.56 August 2026 — 8,601 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,601 subscribers6 August 2026 — 8,605 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,698 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,794 subscribers6 August 202611 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 5 days, net +193. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,572–8,823 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Aug 2026, 11:588,794+96
8 Aug 2026, 20:558,698+93
6 Aug 2026, 07:108,605+4
6 Aug 2026, 03:018,601no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:378,601first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
25.7%
avg views ÷ 8,794 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,260
30 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 29 of 30 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held31 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total67,890
Reactions total1,475
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 15:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,330
Videos
322
Links
411

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4m 13s
Average length
1m 03s

Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,338 reactions across 26 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍30622.9%
22216.6%
😁16012.0%
🔥1098.15%
🙏987.32%
💯896.65%
🤬654.86%
🤣473.51%
🤯423.14%
🫡392.91%
custom 5190885138799549847382.84%
👏261.94%
👎191.42%
custom 5310058695873289238171.27%
141.05%
🥰110.822%
custom 519067333678231518190.673%
custom 527597342739033655780.598%
🤔70.523%
🤝70.523%
4 further kinds50.374%

Custom emoji. 4 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,475reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:36 UTC≈2,190 views36 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Кузня Мордора Кстати, там вы можете заказать себе цевье с гравировкой

👍28custom 52759734273903365578

11 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,330 views10 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @russkie_medvediFile

#технический_разбор

👍82

11 Aug 2026, 11:38 UTC≈1,300 views19 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @russkie_medvediPhoto

📄 Техническая справка по БПЛА «Хорнет» («Марсианин 2») В документе собраны материалы по конструкции и устройству БПЛА «Хорнет»: общие сведения, технические характеристики, расположение основных блоков, боевые части, пусковая установка, навигация, радиочастотная часть и антенны. Отдельные разделы посвящены средствам обнаружения БПЛА, обобщённым данным по системе и противодействию, а также приложению с трофейными мат

👍154

11 Aug 2026, 11:13 UTC≈1,320 views34 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мне все чаще в личку поступают предложения о рекламе за деньги. Можете не предлагать. ЗА ДЕНЬГИ рекламы у меня нет и не будет. Если у вас полезный, нужный и актуальный контент- я поддержу Вас бесплатно. Связь как всегда @adm_militarymanagers. Менеджер✈️

👍22💯8🤝3🔥1

11 Aug 2026, 10:11 UTC≈1,490 views52 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

питерские либералы во время мобилизации на лбс:

😁397👍4🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 07:59 UTC≈1,390 views25 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zavozrusPhoto

🤔 Нельзя просто так взять рандомную треногу и быть уверенным, что на нее можно установить, к примеру, пулемет «Утес». Для этого нужны соответствующие инженерные решения. 1⃣Наши треноги и турели в базовом виде подходят для ПКМ и Печенега, как для самых распространенных пулеметов; 2⃣При помощи переходника для зенитных установок можно вести огонь из: АК, РПК, пулемета Дягтерева; 3⃣Лафет нужен для адаптации установки

👍194🤣2

11 Aug 2026, 07:10 UTC≈1,520 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026

хохлы за это ответят

😁18💯136custom 53100586958732892385

11 Aug 2026, 06:51 UTC≈1,550 views18 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Карту заблокировали, чуть позже доведем новые реквизиты

🔥9custom 53100586958732892385🫡3😱1

10 Aug 2026, 16:46 UTC≈1,740 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Хочу напомнить принципы, с которыми я создавал данный канал. Эти ценности будут неизменны, пока я жив. Служу России! Менеджер ✈️

👍23👏6🔥5👎21

10 Aug 2026, 15:53 UTC≈1,740 views76 reactionsread 12 August 2026

«Во время войны нельзя говорить плохо о своих. Никогда. Даже если они неправы. Даже если твоя страна неправа во время войны, ты не должен говорить о ней плохо. Это очень старый, простой и примитивный принцип, но это так. Когда война не угрожает, когда война кончилась — тогда да, можно говорить: вот это было не так, и то было не так, давайте постараемся, чтобы в будущем такого не было». -Сергей Бодров.

💯38🔥16👎11🤔7👍31

10 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,770 views71 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Джага отныне не имеет отношения к каналу Military Managers. Все его комментарии выражают исключительно его позицию и не совпадают с позицией канала. Тик ток и инстаграм к нам так же не относится. Единственная официальная платформа, на которой мы ведем публичную деятельность- ТГ. Менеджер✈️

🤯38custom 519088513879954984720👎6🤬3🫡21👀1

9 Aug 2026, 20:15 UTC≈2,170 views92 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Я знаю отличное подразделение, которое с радостью примет кадра в белой футболке. Покажет в настоящем бою на что он способен. Ситуация требует огласки. Товарищи из силовых структур, которые читают нас- ВАШ ВЫХОД! Принимать обязательно так же, как принимали тех, кто обманывал ветеранов СВО на деньги. С хорошими пенальти в череп и последующее щекотание пяток резиновой палкой. Работайте, братья, валите чертей!

🤬62💯21custom 519088513879954984754

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @militarymanagers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@militarymanagers edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 4,136 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 20 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Military Managers🇷🇺” (@militarymanagers), 8,794 subscribers as measured 11 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/militarymanagers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.