Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 49% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 44 days, net -161. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 25,790–25,999 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 16:15
25,814
-2
16 Sept 2026, 11:19
25,816
-9
14 Sept 2026, 17:37
25,825
-6
13 Sept 2026, 06:21
25,831
-6
11 Sept 2026, 10:21
25,837
-12
8 Sept 2026, 16:21
25,849
-9
5 Sept 2026, 06:41
25,858
-6
3 Sept 2026, 11:01
25,864
+1
2 Sept 2026, 08:12
25,863
+4
1 Sept 2026, 06:46
25,859
-7
31 Aug 2026, 08:11
25,866
-2
30 Aug 2026, 07:57
25,868
-5
29 Aug 2026, 10:16
25,873
-12
28 Aug 2026, 09:12
25,885
-3
27 Aug 2026, 05:54
25,888
-10
26 Aug 2026, 04:32
25,898
-6
25 Aug 2026, 03:16
25,904
-8
23 Aug 2026, 17:13
25,912
-6
22 Aug 2026, 00:15
25,918
-13
20 Aug 2026, 20:04
25,931
first reading
Engagement
32 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 58 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
16.1%
avg views ÷ 25,814 subscribers
Avg views / post
4,140
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.23%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 32 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held
32 (3 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total
12,430
Reactions total
401
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
3 Sept 2026, 10:23 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 31s
Average length
38s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
5,503 reactions across 31 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
2,326
42.3%
❤
1,883
34.2%
🤬
543
9.87%
👏
329
5.98%
😢
220
4.00%
👌
70
1.27%
❤🔥
64
1.16%
👎
32
0.582%
🥴
31
0.563%
🎉
3
0.055%
🥱
2
0.036%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 32 of the 32 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5,665 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
بعضی از شوخیها اصلا قشنگ نیست و متاسفانه بیشتر از طرف آقایون و در جمعهای دوستانه است!
-عزیزم خسته شدی، من میگم بذار یه زن دیگه بگیرم، کمکت کنه!هرهرهر
-بچهها یه سفر مجردی بریم تایلند! هرهرهر
و ۱۰ ها مورد دیگه
اما این شوخیها برای شریک عاطفیشون خندهدار نیست؛ یادآوری اینه که احساسات و امنیتش میتونه سوژه خنده باشه. احترام، چیزی نیست که بشه باهاش شوخی کرد. این مدل شوخیها شاید چند ثانیه خنده بیارن،ولی میتونن اعتماد…
آفرین بر روانِ مولانا!
روزی حضرت مولانا از محلّهای میگذشت؛ دو شخص بیگانه با همدیگر مناقشه و منازعه میکردند و به همدیگر «زی و قاف» (بد و بیراه) میگفتند. حضرت مولانا از دور توقف فرموده و (سخنان آنان را) میشنود که یکی به دیگری میگوید که:
«یعنی به من میگویی؟ واللّه واللّه که اگر یکی بگویی، هزار بشنوی.»
خداوندگار پیش آمد فرمود که:
«نی، نی؛ بیا هرچه گفتنی داری به من بگو که اگر هزار بگویی، یکی هم نشنوی.»
هر دو خصم، …
خوابهای طلایی،
دوباره خوابی شیرین دیدم، خواب خانهای.
آب زلال از چشمهای جاری میان حیاط آن میگذشت که تصویر مبهم و رنگارنگ گلهای کنار آن چشمها را نوازش میکرد.
دلیل کابوسهای بیپایانم را میدانم، اما دشوار است فهم این روزنه نور میان هجوم انبوه شبانه رویاهای ترسناک.
شاید... چون جایی دور دست در ژرفای روان خسته و دل غمگینم امید و آرزو دارند برای فرزندشان رویا ترانه میخوانند.
همسایه ها در خوابم بیاندازه خوب و مهربا…
در مراسم بزرگداشت بیل برادلی، سناتور نیوجرسی که در سال 1987 برگزار شد، اتفاق جالبی رخ داد؛
برادلی منتظر بود تا سخنرانیاش را ایراد کند.
پیشخدمتی که مشغول کار بود، تکهای کره در بشقاب او گذاشت.
برادلی به او گفت: ببخشید ممکن است من دوتکه کره داشته باشم پیشخدمت جواب داد: خیر!
هرنفر، یک تکه.
برادلی گفت: گمان میکنم شما مرا بجا نیاوردید.
من بیلی برادلی، فارغ التحصیل آکسفورد، بازیکن حرفه ای بسکتبال،
قهرمان جهان و سناتور ای…
خانم معلم ترکیهای به دانشآموز خجالتیش میگه از بین این دوتا کاغذ که دستمه یکیو انتخاب کن، اگه کاغذ خالی رو انتخاب کردی به کل کلاس نمره کامل میدم؛
+درحالی که هر دو کاغذ خالیه ولی کسی نمیدونه.
❤️
وقتی همه میبینند کاغذی که انتخاب کرده خالیه تشویقش میکنند، این کار باعث میشه بقیه دانشآموزان ارتباط بیشتری باهاش بگیرند و دیگه خجالت نکشه.
T.me/bishuoori
با ارسال کد 02 (معرف کمپین مبارزه با بیشعوری) به شماره زیر در واتساپ، عضو پویش رانندگی ایمن خواهید شد:
https://wa.me/989303170960
با عضویت در این پویش متعهد به
رانندگی بین خطوط
و رعایت فاصله طولی
میشوید؛
🌹
https://t.me/bishuoori/18175?single
در خصوص این پیامتون؛
به نظرم چندان حرکت باشعورانهای نیست که به جای آموزش یک فرهنگ درست، از همان اول بسم الله طرف رو بیشعور و... خطاب کنیم.
اولین قدم فرهنگ سازی و آموزش دادن، لحن و گفتار نیک و درسته؛ نه نگاه بالا به پایین داشتن و خودت رو با شعور و بخش اعظمی از مردم رو بیشعور خطاب کردن.
من خودم خیلی تلاش میکنم به حقوق دیگران احترام بذارم، ولی طبیعیه خیلی چیزهارو نه از عمد و لج…
مهم.
نیازمند همت همه شما ایرانیان برای بازنشر و امضاء گسترده.
کارزار به رای عمومی گذاشتن هرگونه قرارداد یا تفاهم نامه درباره تقسیم آب های دریای کاسپین/ مازندران یا بستر دریا بر پایه اصول همه پرسی در قانون اساسی.
به دلیل عدم همکاری کارزارنت برای ساخت، این کارزار در بستر دیگری ساخته شد.
بخوانید و در صورت موافقت امضاء کنید.
https://c.org/ChKK8nWChW
از چه کسی باید تقدیر کرد؟
میگویند ارزش یک کاپیتان را وقتی میشود فهمید که کشتی گرفتار حادثه شود. اما یک سؤال مهم وجود دارد: اگر یک کاپیتان اصلاً اجازه ندهد کشتی گرفتار حادثه شود، چه؟*
فرض کنید دو کشتی، با فاصله چند ساعت، از یک بندر حرکت میکنند. هر دو یک مقصد دارند و هر دو باید از مسیری عبور کنند که در بخشی از آن، صخرهای خطرناک در زیر آب پنهان شده است.
کشتی اول به کاپیتانی سپرده شده که سالها تجربه دارد؛ مردی ش…
من صندوقدار یک فروشگاهِ موادِ غذایی هستم.
شیفتِ شب کار میکنم
از ساعت ۱۰ شب تا ۶ صبح
وقتی شبها کار میکنی،
معمولاً آدمهای ثابتی را می بینی؛
بی خوابها،
کارگرهای شیفتِ شب،
آدمهایی که کسی منتظرِ آنها نیست و عجله ای ندارند به خانه های شان برگردند!
حدودِ دو ماه پیش، مردی ساعتِ ۲ بامداد به صندوقِ من مراجعه کرد و دقیقاً به یاد دارم که ۱۷ دلار و ۲۳ سِنت پول خریدش را با یک اسکناسِ ۲۰ دلاری پرداخت کرد.
وقتی بقیه پول و رسیدش را …
وحشت انگیزتر از هوش مصنوعی!
این روزها و همه جا با خبرها، گفتهها و نوشتههای بسیاری درباره هوش مصنوعی و نگرانی از آسیبهای آن به انسانهای امروز و آینده روبرو میشویم که گاهی تن و بدن بزرگ و کوچک را میلرزانند.
اما گونههای بدتر از هوش مصنوعی سدهها و شاید هزارهها است که گریبان آدمی را گرفته و هنوز هم بدون چاره و درمان قطعی به انسانها آسیب می رسانند.
- کم هوش مصنوعی:
این پدیده بسیار خطرناک زمانی که پای سود یا سوء …
👍38❤13👌7👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 32 posts we hold for @bishuoori. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@bishuoori edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
10 August 2026
Most recent edit
10 August 2026
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
باید بدون ملاحظه با مخاطب صحبت کرد تا تاثیر بهتری بگذارد20%
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 32 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 31 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 13 September 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
مخفیگاه @makhfigah_channel · 63,252 Telegram ranks this channel #44 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 21 August 2026
Shayan.behjati زبان انگلیسی @shayanbehjatienglish · 41,345 Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 29 August 2026
شیرینی سرا @shirinisara · 22,743 Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 20 September 2026
پیج خلاقیت™ @page_khalaghiat · 42,773 Telegram ranks this channel #57 of 78 here — alongside 77 others — read 29 August 2026
کتابدونی @ketabdooni · 148,714 Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
آرامش (چهلسالگي)... @chehel_salegi · 31,218 Telegram ranks this channel #65 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 6 September 2026
داریوش نقطه عطف صدا @Dariush0Atfsdaa · 44,129 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 28 August 2026
امید امانی | Omid Amani @dr_amaniiiii · 93,697 Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 16 August 2026
This channel appears in 8 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“کمپین مبارزه با بیشعوری” (@bishuoori), 25,814 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/bishuoori.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.