✅️ «رادیو اُفسِت» قسمت جدید منتشر شد. 🟠از کستباکس بشنوید🟠 [این قسمت: پزشکی که شاهد هم بود!] موزیک های این قسمت: 1. Az khoone javanane vatan اسپانسر: هنوز نداریم💔 @piecesbook

Channel
رسانه مسعود شُکری
@ShokriMasoud
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
37subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001263644179 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ShokriMasoud |
| Description | تاب آوری، تغییر اقلیم، مهندسی سوانح، مدیریت ریسک و ایمنی، مهندسی ترافیک، محیط زیست، فرهنگ تکثرگرایی و تفکر انتقادی |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 30 June 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ShokriMasoud |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 | 37 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 19:32 | 37 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 16 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 40.0%
- avg views ÷ 37 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 14.8
- 11 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 11
- of 18 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (16 November 2025 – 10 August 2026) |
| Views total | 163 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 10 Aug 2026, 22:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Photos
- 157
- Videos
- 104
- Links
- 99
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 10 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
- Video runtime
- 1h 10m
- Average length
- 23m 28s
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Recent posts
کاپیتالیسم و تاریخنگاران مهدی تدینی: در این فایل صوتی دربارهٔ کتاب "کاپیتالیسم و تاریخنگاران" توضیح دادهام و کلاً بحثی تاریخی دربارهٔ درک کاپیتالیسم کردهام. -tarikhandishi- @uttweet
کتاب "کاپیتالیسم و تاریخنگاران"، اثری به ویراستاری هایک، منتشر شد. این کتاب چهاردهمین مجلد از مجموعه ایدئولوژیپژوهیست که در نشر کتاب پارسه منتشر میکنم. این اثر به ما نشان میدهد بسیاری از انگارههای کاپیتالیسمستیزانه چگونه وارد دنیای افکار شده است — انگارههایی که نقش مهمی در سرنوشت ملتها و کوچ تودهای ملتها به سوی سوسیالیسم ویرانگر داشته است. -مهدی تدینی- @uttweet
اینکه آدم در مسیر خودش اشتباه کند، بهتر از این است که در مسیر شخص دیگری درست عمل کند. - فئودور داستایفسکی
امروز روز جهانی عاشقانِ کتابه. ✌️🏻
شاید مهمترین تصمیم زندگیت، انتخاب آدمهای دور و برت باشه یه نکته جالب که بارها توی تحقیقات دانشگاهی بهش اشاره شده اینه که آدمها فقط تحت تأثیر عادتهای خودشون نیستن؛ بلکه از رفتار، طرز فکر و سبک زندگی نزدیکترین آدمهای اطرافشون هم تأثیر میگیرن. به همین خاطره که خیلیها میگن موفقیت، فقط نتیجهی استعداد یا تلاش نیست؛ محیط و گروهی که توش زندگی میکنی هم نقش خیلی مهمی داره. اگه بیشتر وقتت رو با آدمهایی بگذرونی که …
✅ چرا مسعود دیروز مجبور به درآوردن کت شد؟ ✍️حامد پاک طینت مسعود پزشکیان رئیس جمهور محبوبمان دیروز در مصاحبه تاریخی خود بدلیل گرمای اتاق مجبور به درآوردن کت خود در مقابل چشمان میلیونها نفر شد تا نشان دهد صرفه جویی راهی به مراتب خلاقانه از روشن کردن کولر در چله تابستان و حتی در دفتر بالاترین مقام اجرایی کشور است! حرکتی تکان دهنده بود؛ او حق دارد کتش را درآورد چون ۱۵% از برق تولیدی کشور در مسیر انتقال تلف می شود و چن…
[شناسنامهی اپیزود اول: مریم و شروین] خلاصهی این قسمت: توی این اپیزود، رفتیم سراغ دو تا از خفنترین مشتریهای کتابفروشیمون و قصهی این زوجِ کتابخون رو تعریف کردیم و کلی چیزای جدید دربارهی رابطه بهم یادآوری کردیم... 🎧 پادکستی که معرفی شد: پادکست "مَن، زَن"، مجموعه نظرات دكتر سمانه جهانبخش در موضوع توانمندسازى زنان است كه نتيجه مطالعات و سالها مصاحبه با زنانی است که در طول جلسات درمان دغدغههای خود را با او بیان…
🎙 رادیو اُفسِت این قسمت: یک روح تو دو تا جسم ●●● من پروینم و تو یه کتابفروشی کار میکنم. اینجا هر قسمت، قصه آدمایی رو تعریف میکنم که میتونن به اندازهی یک کتاب حرف داشته باشن. اگه میتونی دل به دل دنیای یه کتابفروش بدی، دستمو بگیرو بیا🫴 @piecesbook
یاد کوچینگ قلعه نویی افتادم -kor- @uttweet
🖥ویدئویی دیگر از شدت زلزله مرگبار ونزوئلا 🔹یک ماه پس از وقوع دو زمینلرزه شدید با شدت ۷.۲ و ۷.۵ ریشتر در ونزوئلا، ابعاد واقعی این فاجعه طبیعی همچنان در حال آشکار شدن است و شمار قربانیان افزایش یافته است. 🔹بر اساس اعلام منابع رسمی، تاکنون ۵۲۰۸ نفر در پی این دو زمینلرزه جان خود را از دست دادهاند و بیش از ۱۶ هزار نفر نیز زخمی شدهاند. 🔹مقامهای ونزوئلایی هشدار دادهاند که احتمال افزایش شمار قربانیان وجود دارد و ابع…
نصف اشتباهاتمان ناشی از این است که وقتی باید فکر کنیم، احساس میکنیم و وقتی که باید احساس کنیم، فکر میکنیم... #هاروکی_موراکامی 📚 @BookTop
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ShokriMasoud. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 1,011,267 of 1,151,006entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
@piecesbook · 6,6433 postsتوییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها
@uttweet · 142,0123 postsاخبار فوری / مهم 🔖
@akhbare_fouri · 973,9851 postانجمن علمی مهندسی معماری
@ArchitecturalEngAssociation · 3791 postکتابخانه
@BookTop · 355,8571 postمجمع فعالان اقتصادی
@iran_economy_online · 140,6211 postMarkuart ( مارکوارت )
@markuart · 1,2381 postسیامک قاسمی
@siamak_ghassemi · 100,7061 post
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
@piecesbook · 6,6433 postsتوییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها
@uttweet · 142,0123 postsاخبار فوری / مهم 🔖
@akhbare_fouri · 973,9851 postکتابخانه
@BookTop · 355,8571 postمجمع فعالان اقتصادی
@iran_economy_online · 140,6211 postMarkuart ( مارکوارت )
@markuart · 1,2381 postسیامک قاسمی
@siamak_ghassemi · 100,7061 postویرگول
@virgolbooks · 301 post
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@ShokriMasoud named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 11 August 2026 – 11 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“رسانه مسعود شُکری” (@ShokriMasoud), 37 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ShokriMasoud.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.