Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫

Channel

سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫

@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

66,392subscribers

+13 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001124945229
TypeChannel
Username@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi
Description🔴بزرگترین رسانه سینما در ایران🔴 مرجع بازنشربرترین توییتهای سینمایی کاربران بخش فارسی توییتر درتلگرام سفارش تبلیغ @TheGodFatherMovie @Cinema_Twitter_Farsibot بات دانلود فیلم @Film_Bazzi فیلم twitter.com/cinema_T_farsi instagram.com/CinemaTwitterFarsi
Created13 January 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/Cinema_Twitter_Farsi

Growth

66,37966,41566,3976 August 2026 — 66,379 subscribers6 August 2026 — 66,379 subscribers7 August 2026 — 66,398 subscribers7 August 2026 — 66,395 subscribers9 August 2026 — 66,391 subscribers10 August 2026 — 66,393 subscribers11 August 2026 — 66,397 subscribers12 August 2026 — 66,415 subscribers13 August 2026 — 66,406 subscribers14 August 2026 — 66,397 subscribers16 August 2026 — 66,392 subscribers66,3926 August 202616 August 2026
11 measurements spanning 10 days, net +13. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 66,374–66,420 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 02:3766,392-5
14 Aug 2026, 15:1766,397-9
13 Aug 2026, 03:3366,406-9
12 Aug 2026, 04:5366,415+18
11 Aug 2026, 05:0366,397+4
10 Aug 2026, 03:4066,393+2
9 Aug 2026, 00:5266,391-4
7 Aug 2026, 21:1866,395-3
7 Aug 2026, 00:0466,398+19
6 Aug 2026, 02:0066,379no change
6 Aug 2026, 01:5366,379first reading

Engagement

71 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
12.2%
avg views ÷ 66,392 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,120
71 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.525%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
71
of 71 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held71 (3 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total576,400
Reactions total3,025
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken16 Aug 2026, 03:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
22,800
Videos
5,670
Links
1,660

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 16 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
2m 14s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,874 reactions across 65 posts, in 33 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 36.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,04436.3%
👍56119.5%
👎34412.0%
💔2097.27%
🔥1786.19%
🤣1043.62%
😁993.44%
😭712.47%
🤡471.64%
🤝351.22%
🥱260.905%
👏190.661%
🗿190.661%
🫡170.592%
🥰140.487%
❤‍🔥110.383%
👌100.348%
🤔100.348%
🏆70.244%
😢70.244%
13 further kinds421.46%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 71 of the 71 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,025reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 71 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 71 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @Cinema_Twitter_Farsi. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 71 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 20:31 UTC≈2,310 views6 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

• حلقه هنر فلانور • «سینما و تاریخ اندیشه» • از مارکس تا برگسون • مدرسین: مازیاراسلامی، صالح نجفی • یکشنبه‌ها ساعت ۱۸ الی ۲۰ • شرکت در این‌ دوره به صورت حضوری و آنلاین امکان‌پذیر می‌باشد. • لازم به ذکر است که هر یک از ترم‌های این دوره امکان ثبت‌نام جداگانه را دارند و ترم‌ها پیش نیاز یکدیگر نیستند. • برای اطلاعات بیشتر و ثبت‌نام دوره، به شماره‌ی ۰۹۳۵۴۸۶۸۷۰۸ در تلگرام و یا دایرکت اینستاگرام پیام دهید. Instagram:

6

15 Aug 2026, 20:02 UTC≈3,020 views37 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

فیلم the invite ، ساده و بسیار زیبا بود خانوم Olivia wilde از زمان Tron تا الان همچنان کراشه و تو کارگرانی هم نشون داده که کار بلده اگه ازین فیلم خوشتون اومده حتما Carnage پولانسکی هم ببینید "Megumi"

👍20👎152

15 Aug 2026, 17:30 UTC≈3,890 views28 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

🖋️ اگر فرصت خوندنِ رمان خانم الیزابت گسکل رو ندارید، این مینی‌سریال رو ببینید. بی‌نظیره به‌نظرم در ارائهٔ صورت‌بندی‌ای از اختلاف طبقاتی، بی‌آنکه تولیدِ کینه‌توزی بکنه. خود الیزابت گسکل از اون نادره‌های ادبیات انگلیسی است. "Old Sport"

22👍3👌2💘1

15 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC≈4,430 views36 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

این دقیقاً تعریفیه که من از «به اندازه بودن» دارم خیلی وقت بود هیچ فیلم میخکوب پای تماشا نگهم نداشته بود اینطوری بهتون بگم که محشررررر شروع فوق‌العاده و گیرا از من فیلمباز بپذیرید و برید ببینید "Baloch 10"

22👍10🔥4

15 Aug 2026, 15:00 UTC≈4,580 views2 reactionsread 16 August 2026

سرویس و کیفیتشون خوبه اگر از کانفیگ های بی کیفیت خسته شدین توصیه میکنم تست بگیرید کد تخفیف ۳۰ درصدی اختصاصی : Cinema30

👍2

15 Aug 2026, 14:54 UTC≈4,610 views3 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

اتصال پایدار، سرعت واقعی، بدون محدودیت ⚡ آیپی ثابت اختصاصی 🎯 پینگ پایدار بدون پرش و افت کیفیت در طول روز 🎮 مناسب گیم | ترید | کار حرفه‌ای | هوش مصنوعی ✔️سرویس تانل‌شده برای سخت‌ترین شرایط تک کانفیگ VIP تانل = هر گیگ 8000 تومان سرویس ماهانه نامحدود = 189000تومان دریافت تست و تجربه کیفیت 👇 @NetMasterGateBot

👍21

15 Aug 2026, 09:11 UTC≈5,690 views53 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

حالا که بحث فیلم the invite داغه، برید فیلم فرانسوی four lovers رو هم ببینید که خیلی جسورانه تر به این موضوع پرداخته. "خوخ"

👎2910👍6🤬5👌3

14 Aug 2026, 10:26 UTC≈6,800 views24 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

#پیشنهاد_فیلم یکی از متفاوت‌ترین نگاه‌ها به سوگ و فقدان در این فیلم جریان داره. فیلم غمگینتون می‌کنه و احتمالا خاطرات شخصی از سوگ رو براتون زنده می‌کنه اما در نهایت پایان‌بندی فیلم غافلگیرتون می‌کنه و باعث می‌شه هرگز فراموشش نکنید. #AnotherEnd "Mar(y)Jan(e)"

21👍3

14 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈7,120 views33 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

فعلا نزدیک به هفتاد هزار عنوان فیلم و سریال ایرانی در یوتیوب موجوده. در این صفحه میتونین بدون تبلیغات و آگهی های یوتیوب یکجا جستجو و تماشا کنید. شاید بدردتون خورد. https://citoreh.github.io/itube/ "Setareh"

30👌3

13 Aug 2026, 20:10 UTC≈6,880 views30 reactionsread 16 August 2026
Photo

یک شاهکارِ سکوت؛ داستانِ زنی که در میانِ یک زندگیِ روزمره و خانگی، در حالِ فروپاشیِ آرامِ مرزهای واقعیت و خیال است. این فیلم، یعنی تقابلِ میانِ سکونِ ظاهری و طوفانِ درونی و عصیان. " •خـــــانم‌ِاو•"

👍148🥱6🤓1🤬1

13 Aug 2026, 19:53 UTC≈6,790 views11 reactionsread 16 August 2026

دلربا یه اپ آشنایی و دوستیابیه که بیشتر از ۲۰ هزار کاربر فعال داره 💕 🤖 دلربا یه ربات هم داره که می‌تونید مستقیم توی تلگرام ازش استفاده کنید و با آدم‌های جدید آشنا بشید. اگه دوست داشتید یه تجربه متفاوت داشته باشید، ربات دلربا رو امتحان کنید 👀✨ 👇 ورود به ربات

8🥴3

13 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC≈7,060 views36 reactionsread 16 August 2026

یک سریال هفت قسمتی دیدم بنام رابطه سنت لوئیس ..پشمام ریخته از مشکلات شخصی و جنسی ادم ها ....پیشنهاد میکنم حتما ببینید...DTF "میراث"

👎18👍12🤔3🔥21

Showing the 12 most recent of 71 posts we hold for @Cinema_Twitter_Farsi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 63,659 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

🎥 CinemaFact 📺
@MyCinemaFact2 · 289,311
Telegram ranks this channel #5 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
BOOK™
@lBOOKl · 189,296
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 11 August 2026
دیالوگ های ماندگار
@tinymoviez · 124,918
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 13 August 2026
◀️MLI.English▶️
@mlienglish · 268,082
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 10 August 2026
توییتر فارسی
@officialpersiatwiter · 567,501
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
صدا و سکوت
@SoundSilence · 118,709
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 14 August 2026
پادکست پلی لیست|Playlist
@Playlistpodcas · 152,357
Telegram ranks this channel #59 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 12 August 2026
کتابخانه
@BookTop · 356,657
Telegram ranks this channel #63 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 10 August 2026
تهران پادکست | پادکست و کتاب صوتی
@tehranpodcast · 228,770
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 11 August 2026
توییتر دانشگاه تهرانی ها
@uttweet · 142,169
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 13 August 2026
حافظه تاریخی
@hafezeye_tarikhi · 139,467
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 13 August 2026
PDF | پی دی اف
@PDFsCom · 302,567
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 10 August 2026
Soul of Dream️️
@SoulofDream · 169,039
Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 12 August 2026
مملکته
@mamlekate · 571,484
Telegram ranks this channel #81 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 9 August 2026
Radio Relax
@RadiioRelax · 132,220
Telegram ranks this channel #85 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 13 August 2026
Virauniversity | ویرا
@virauniversitycom · 381,841
Telegram ranks this channel #86 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 10 August 2026
FactNameh | فکت‌نامه
@factnameh · 111,862
Telegram ranks this channel #91 of 96 here — alongside 95 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 17 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“سینما توییتر فارسی ⚫⚫” (@Cinema_Twitter_Farsi), 66,392 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/Cinema_Twitter_Farsi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.