🔴فوری از سپاه: تو دومین مرحله از پاسخ به تجاوز آشکار ارتش ایالات متحده آمریکا🇺🇸، رادار سایت پدافندی این کشور تو پایگاه بالگردی الرفاع بحرين🇧🇭 رو با شش پهپاد هدف گرفتيم که صدای اصابتش شنیده شد! @DrTeL
🖕5,540🤣909🔥576❤160👍22🤷♀8👌7🕊7

Channel
@drtel
On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry
780,182subscribers
+17,689 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001548798708 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Usernames | @drtel @drtel18 |
| Description | پوشش اخبار و اتفاقات جهان به سبک با ادب ترین دکترِ جهان + بدون وابستگی به هیچ گروه یا ارگانی |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 133 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/drtel |
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.
| Posted first | Then | Overlap | Gap |
|---|---|---|---|
| @drtel/64674 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC | @tell_news18/2658311 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC | 0.97 | 17 minutes |
| @drtel/66979 · this entry26 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC | @tell_news18/2841426 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC | 0.96 | 22 minutes |
| @drtel/67459 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 20:30 UTC | @tell_news18/289068 Oct 2026, 02:33 UTC | 0.95 | 6.1 hours |
| @drtel/72636 · this entry13 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC | @tell_news18/3040313 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC | 0.95 | 72 seconds |
| @drtel/66777 · this entry21 Sept 2026, 22:16 UTC | @tell_news18/2826222 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTC | 0.94 | 10 hours |
| @drtel/64465 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC | @tell_news18/263757 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC | 0.94 | 2.7 hours |
| Channel | Matching posts | Text overlap | Typical gap | Published first |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| @tell_news18 | 114 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 42 minutes | this entry (113–1) |
| @EterafSra | 85 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 61 minutes | this entry (85–0) |
| @FuckNewsi | 74 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 2.9 hours | this entry (74–0) |
| @ZanZndegiAzadi | 60 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 1.9 hours | this entry (60–0) |
| @ProxyKhabri | 54 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 7 minutes | this entry (54–0) |
| @Fuck1News | 52 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 7 minutes | this entry (52–0) |
| @hashieh | 45 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 87 minutes | this entry (45–0) |
| @CheKhabarDonya | 44 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 5.1 hours | this entry (44–0) |
| @RedLineTel | 41 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 55 minutes | this entry (40–1) |
| @BreakingNews_98 | 27 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.98 | 11 minutes | this entry (27–0) |
| @ireday | 27 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.96 | 72 seconds | this entry (27–0) |
| @tweet_Khabari | 26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed) | 0.95 | 1.5 hours | this entry (26–0) |
Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.
What this cannot establish
MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.
Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.
“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,942 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.
The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.
Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Nov 2026, 10:55 | 780,182 | -476 |
| 13 Nov 2026, 12:58 | 780,658 | -1,044 |
| 11 Nov 2026, 11:10 | 781,702 | -216 |
| 10 Nov 2026, 22:46 | 781,918 | -669 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 14:54 | 782,587 | -136 |
| 9 Nov 2026, 10:20 | 782,723 | -434 |
| 8 Nov 2026, 07:21 | 783,157 | -65 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 783,222 | +296 |
| 7 Nov 2026, 03:25 | 782,926 | +270 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 21:39 | 782,656 | -292 |
| 6 Nov 2026, 03:07 | 782,948 | -84 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 20:37 | 783,032 | -339 |
| 5 Nov 2026, 02:46 | 783,371 | -102 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 20:36 | 783,473 | +4 |
| 4 Nov 2026, 00:59 | 783,469 | -16 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 20:18 | 783,485 | +253 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 23:18 | 783,232 | +490 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 21:05 | 782,742 | +99 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 23:26 | 782,643 | -47 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 21:10 | 782,690 | first reading |
2,761 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 212 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 2,761 (5 August 2026 – 15 November 2026) |
| Views total | 126,053,905 |
| Reactions total | 9,228,065 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 15 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Measured directly from 430 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.
| Post | Readings | Latest reading | Curve | 24h reach | Half of last-observed views by |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| /644326 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC | 111 minutes – 11 minutes old | 24,200 views ~3,382 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | not measurable yet |
| /644316 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC | 220 minutes – 51 minutes old | 62,300 views ~2,532 reactions | no checkpoint reading yet | not yet at 24h | 20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644306 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC | 334 minutes – 1.6 hours old | 92,500 views ~6,570 reactions | 60 minutes: 71,131 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 34 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644286 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC | 518 minutes – 2.4 hours old | 111,000 views ~5,779 reactions | 60 minutes: 62,088 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644266 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC | 623 minutes – 3.0 hours old | 118,000 views ~4,764 reactions | 60 minutes: 63,593 interp. → 3.0 hours: 118,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644256 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC | 638 minutes – 3.2 hours old | 118,000 views ~2,294 reactions | 60 minutes: 65,001 interp. → 3.0 hours: 114,991 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644246 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC | 61.8 hours – 4.4 hours old | 133,000 views ~5,471 reactions | 3.0 hours: 112,636 interp.still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 1.8 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
| /644236 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC | 62.4 hours – 5.0 hours old | 137,000 views ~5,685 reactions | 3.0 hours: 111,000still climbing at last reading | not yet at 24h | 2.4 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing |
Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.
10,411,172 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🖕 | 3,280,243 | 31.5% | |
| 🤣 | 3,049,187 | 29.3% | |
| ❤ | 2,227,587 | 21.4% | |
| 👍 | 616,654 | 5.92% | |
| 💔 | 503,155 | 4.83% | |
| 🔥 | 263,747 | 2.53% | |
| 👎 | 130,346 | 1.25% | |
| 😐 | 96,872 | 0.93% | |
| 😍 | 59,195 | 0.569% | |
| 🤬 | 34,633 | 0.333% | |
| 👏 | 28,981 | 0.278% | |
| 🤯 | 28,041 | 0.269% | |
| 😢 | 26,928 | 0.259% | |
| 😁 | 14,579 | 0.14% | |
| 😭 | 14,567 | 0.14% | |
| 🗿 | 8,164 | 0.078% | |
| 🦄 | 3,971 | 0.038% | |
| 🤷♂ | 3,608 | 0.035% | |
| 💋 | 3,313 | 0.032% | |
| 🐳 | 2,715 | 0.026% | |
| 14 further kinds | 14,686 | 0.141% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,411,172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drtel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 83 of 857 posts held from the last 30 days (9.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
🔴فوری از سپاه: تو دومین مرحله از پاسخ به تجاوز آشکار ارتش ایالات متحده آمریکا🇺🇸، رادار سایت پدافندی این کشور تو پایگاه بالگردی الرفاع بحرين🇧🇭 رو با شش پهپاد هدف گرفتيم که صدای اصابتش شنیده شد! @DrTeL
🖕5,540🤣909🔥576❤160👍22🤷♀8👌7🕊7
🔴 خیلیها میپرسن حالا که شرایط جنگیه، اگه تو آسمون شهرمون جنگندهای دیدیم که داره به سمتمون موشک شلیک میکنه، باید چیکار کنیم؟ لطفاً این پست آموزشی رو یه گوشه سیو کنید یا برای عزیزانتون بفرستین تا اگه خدای نکرده تو چنین شرایطی قرار گرفتین، بدونید باید چیکار کنید: #آموزشی @DrTeL
🖕6,130🤣2,270❤127🗿33🫡30👎25👍21🔥15
🇪🇺 نبرد تاجها؛ ماتادورها در مقابل سهشیرها، جایی که غرور اروپا فرداشب به چالش کشیده میشود!🔥 [ اسپانیا 🇪🇸 🆚🏴 انگلیس ] ⚽️ [ نکات کلیدی و مهم ]:👇 1⃣. برتری تاکتیکی اسپانیا: مالکیت توپ، گردش سریع و استفاده از فضاهای کناری، مهمترین سلاح لاروخا برای تحت فشار گذاشتن انگلیس خواهد بود. 2⃣. جنگ ستارهها در خط میانی: تقابل پدری و بلینگام میتواند نقش تعیینکنندهای در کنترل ریتم و خلق موقعیت داشته باشد. 3⃣. فرصتطل…
🖕5,050❤27👎4👍2🤣2
🔴ارتش اسرائیل🇮🇱 دوباره حملات شدید خودشو به جنوب لبنان🇱🇧 شروع کرد : @DrTeL
🖕5,750🔥4,070🤣295❤100👏64💔57👍24🤬20
دیگه تا همینجاشو بلد بودم
🖕5,140🤣4,360😁33❤29💔11🔥9😭8🌚5
اگه نت ها قطع شد چی ؟
🤣3,510😁44👍27❤21😭19👏14🤯12🤔11
👨⚕اگه فردا از آسمون سنگ بباره، بمب اتم بزنن، جنگ جهانی سوم بشه و... من فردا رأس ساعت 10 شب این قرعهکشی رو برگزار میکنم؛ قوانین قرعهکشی هم مثل دفعهی قبله، با این تفاوت که ربات این بار خیلی هوشمندتر شده. اگه بخواین حتی یه دونه ممبر فیک بیارین یا هر نوع تقلبی انجام بدین، از قرعهکشی حذف میشین و شاید حتی از کانال هم ریموو بشین! هرچی عضو قدیمیتری باشین، شانس بیشتری برای برنده شدن توی قرعهکشی دارین. به امید یه ق…
🖕5,240🤣3,430❤369👏43👍40🗿17🔥12👾9
راست میگه دیگه بزارید کارشو بکنه ما هم آمادهایم
🖕5,140🤣4,730❤37🔥25😁17🦄9🤬5😐5
انقدر دلقک بازی فور نکنید تو کانال، هربار خواستم قرعهکشی کنم یه چرت و پرتی فور زدین تو کانال بعدش من بیخیال شدم، خواهشاً این بار جدی باشین بزارین من کارمو بکنم. #مدیریت
🖕5,290🤣4,100👍99❤65😁25🔥11👨💻10👏8
تموم شد مبارک خیلیا
🖕5,120🤣4,910😁31❤26🔥17👍16🤷♀9💋8
🔴فردا شب همگی ساعت 10 شب آنلاین باشید، قراره دور جدیدی از قرعهکشی رو شروع کنیم. #مدیریت
🖕5,210🤣4,220🤯224❤95🔥31😱27👍15💔15
🔴این زوج جوان و خوشبخت که نصف محتوای "اگه سینگلی به هیچ عنوان باز نکن" ما رو تأمین میکردن رو یادتونه؟ شکرخدا بالأخره کات کردن و حالا دختره داره از خاطراتشون تو دنیای واقعی میگه: هرچی واسم میخرید، قبلش باید از مامانش اوکی میگرفت. مثلا اگه ساعت 6 قرار داشتیم، آقا ساعت 9 میرسید. میرفتیم بیرون ازم دنگ میگرفت، مثلا میگفت این شماره کارتمه 2 بزن. بهم گفت کرجه ولی فهمیدم رفته باغشون، منم با پسرخالم اینا ریختیم اونجا …
🖕6,480🤣4,180😐220❤142💔42🤷♂19😢17🗿11
Showing the 12 most recent of 2,761 posts we hold for @drtel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@drtel edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @drtel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
🔴تقریبا سه روز از چالش NNN# گذشت؛ داداشا اعلام وضعیت کنید ببینیم چند چندیم؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
🔴تقريبا یک روز از چالش NNN# گذشت؛ داداشا اعلام وضعیت کنید ببینیم چند چندیم؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
بنظر شما درحال حاضر پشت پرده چه چیزی درحال شکل گیریه؟
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 142 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.
Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1,277 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥” (@drtel), 780,182 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drtel.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.