Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥

Channel

𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥

@drtel

2 usernames

On this record: Topic · Observations · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · View velocity · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Domains linked from posts · Cite this entry

780,182subscribers

+17,689 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 316,228–1,000,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001548798708
TypeChannel
Usernames@drtel @drtel18
Descriptionپوشش اخبار و اتفاقات جهان به سبک با ادب ترین دکترِ جهان + بدون وابستگی به هیچ گروه یا ارگانی
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 November 2026
Measurements held133
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/drtel

Topic

International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 75% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 12 other registered channels. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@drtel/64674 · this entry11 Aug 2026, 15:23 UTC@tell_news18/2658311 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC0.9717 minutes
@drtel/66979 · this entry26 Sept 2026, 14:57 UTC@tell_news18/2841426 Sept 2026, 15:19 UTC0.9622 minutes
@drtel/67459 · this entry7 Oct 2026, 20:30 UTC@tell_news18/289068 Oct 2026, 02:33 UTC0.956.1 hours
@drtel/72636 · this entry13 Nov 2026, 13:55 UTC@tell_news18/3040313 Nov 2026, 13:56 UTC0.9572 seconds
@drtel/66777 · this entry21 Sept 2026, 22:16 UTC@tell_news18/2826222 Sept 2026, 08:21 UTC0.9410 hours
@drtel/64465 · this entry7 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC@tell_news18/263757 Aug 2026, 15:32 UTC0.942.7 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@tell_news18114 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9542 minutesthis entry (113–1)
@EterafSra85 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9661 minutesthis entry (85–0)
@FuckNewsi74 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.962.9 hoursthis entry (74–0)
@ZanZndegiAzadi60 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.961.9 hoursthis entry (60–0)
@ProxyKhabri54 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.957 minutesthis entry (54–0)
@Fuck1News52 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.967 minutesthis entry (52–0)
@hashieh45 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9687 minutesthis entry (45–0)
@CheKhabarDonya44 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.965.1 hoursthis entry (44–0)
@RedLineTel41 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9655 minutesthis entry (40–1)
@BreakingNews_9827 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9811 minutesthis entry (27–0)
@ireday27 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.9672 secondsthis entry (27–0)
@tweet_Khabari26 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)0.951.5 hoursthis entry (26–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 7 of the 7 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 1,942 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 15 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Growth

762,368785,176773,772780,1826 August 202614 November 2026
133 measurements spanning 100 days, net +17,689. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 758,947–788,597 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 133
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Nov 2026, 10:55780,182-476
13 Nov 2026, 12:58780,658-1,044
11 Nov 2026, 11:10781,702-216
10 Nov 2026, 22:46781,918-669
9 Nov 2026, 14:54782,587-136
9 Nov 2026, 10:20782,723-434
8 Nov 2026, 07:21783,157-65
7 Nov 2026, 23:18783,222+296
7 Nov 2026, 03:25782,926+270
6 Nov 2026, 21:39782,656-292
6 Nov 2026, 03:07782,948-84
5 Nov 2026, 20:37783,032-339
5 Nov 2026, 02:46783,371-102
4 Nov 2026, 20:36783,473+4
4 Nov 2026, 00:59783,469-16
3 Nov 2026, 20:18783,485+253
2 Nov 2026, 23:18783,232+490
2 Nov 2026, 21:05782,742+99
1 Nov 2026, 23:26782,643-47
1 Nov 2026, 21:10782,690first reading

Engagement

2,761 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 212 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
18.9%
avg views ÷ 780,182 subscribers
Avg views / post
147,000
857 posts measured
Reaction rate
7.32%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
857
of 2,761 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 November 2026
Posts held2,761 (5 August 2026 – 15 November 2026)
Views total126,053,905
Reactions total9,228,065
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Nov 2026, 06:29 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈17,900
Videos
≈13,100
Links
≈3,710

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
4h 54m
Average length
41s

Measured directly from 430 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

View velocity

How fast this channel’s own posts pick up views, from re-reading them repeatedly in the hours and days after they were published rather than the single reading most entries on this register get. Coverage is early and only a small minority of channels hold it at all — a gap in this section means the post has not been re-read again yet, not that nothing happened.

8 most recently posted, with a view-velocity reading
PostReadingsLatest readingCurve24h reachHalf of last-observed views by
/644326 Aug 2026, 17:34 UTC111 minutes – 11 minutes old24,200 views ~3,382 reactionsno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24hnot measurable yet
/644316 Aug 2026, 16:54 UTC220 minutes – 51 minutes old62,300 views ~2,532 reactionsno checkpoint reading yetnot yet at 24h20 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
/644306 Aug 2026, 16:11 UTC334 minutes – 1.6 hours old92,500 views ~6,570 reactions60 minutes: 71,131 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h34 minutesupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
/644286 Aug 2026, 15:22 UTC518 minutes – 2.4 hours old111,000 views ~5,779 reactions60 minutes: 62,088 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h53 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/644266 Aug 2026, 14:46 UTC623 minutes – 3.0 hours old118,000 views ~4,764 reactions60 minutes: 63,593 interp. → 3.0 hours: 118,000still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/644256 Aug 2026, 14:32 UTC638 minutes – 3.2 hours old118,000 views ~2,294 reactions60 minutes: 65,001 interp. → 3.0 hours: 114,991 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h52 minutesprovisional — final view count still climbing
/644246 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC61.8 hours – 4.4 hours old133,000 views ~5,471 reactions3.0 hours: 112,636 interp.still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h1.8 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing
/644236 Aug 2026, 12:48 UTC62.4 hours – 5.0 hours old137,000 views ~5,685 reactions3.0 hours: 111,000still climbing at last readingnot yet at 24h2.4 hoursupper bound — already past half at first reading · provisional — final view count still climbing

Curve is every standard checkpoint we hold a reading for (+1h, +3h, +6h, +12h, +24h, +48h, +7d after posting) — measured where a real reading landed close enough to that age, interpolated where it did not but readings on both sides let one be worked out between them. Nothing is ever extrapolated past the last real reading. Latest reading is the newest view and reaction count we hold for the post, side by side, so a gap between how views and reactions moved is visible without following it into the Observations section above. 24h reach is that one checkpoint on its own, labelled the same way. Half of last-observed views is the age at which a post’s view count crossed half of the highest figure we have read for it so far — an upper bound when the very first reading was already past half (we cannot see the actual crossing), and biased low while the post is still climbing, since “half of final” is dividing by a number that has not finished growing yet. Both caveats are printed inline wherever they apply, never silently dropped.

Reaction mix

10,411,172 reactions across 1,000 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🖕3,280,24331.5%
🤣3,049,18729.3%
❤2,227,58721.4%
👍616,6545.92%
💔503,1554.83%
🔥263,7472.53%
👎130,3461.25%
😐96,8720.93%
😍59,1950.569%
🤬34,6330.333%
👏28,9810.278%
🤯28,0410.269%
😢26,9280.259%
😁14,5790.14%
😭14,5670.14%
🗿8,1640.078%
🦄3,9710.038%
🤷‍♂3,6080.035%
💋3,3130.032%
🐳2,7150.026%
14 further kinds14,6860.141%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1,000 of the 1,000 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,411,172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2,127
across the posts below
Posts paid on
416
of 1,000 we hold a reading for · 42%
Most on one post
116
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @drtel. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 1,000 most recent posts we hold for this entry (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 83 of 857 posts held from the last 30 days (9.68%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

15 Nov 2026, 05:20 UTC≈55,900 views7,233 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔴فوری از سپاه: تو دومین مرحله از پاسخ به تجاوز آشکار ارتش ایالات متحده آمریکا🇺🇸، رادار سایت پدافندی این کشور تو پایگاه بالگردی الرفاع بحرين🇧🇭 رو با شش پهپاد هدف گرفتيم که صدای اصابتش شنیده شد! @DrTeL

🖕5,540🤣909🔥576❤160👍22🤷‍♀8👌7🕊7

14 Nov 2026, 22:46 UTC≈126,000 views8,670 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🔴 خیلی‌ها می‌پرسن حالا که شرایط جنگیه، اگه تو آسمون شهرمون جنگنده‌ای دیدیم که داره به سمتمون موشک شلیک می‌کنه، باید چیکار کنیم؟ لطفاً این پست آموزشی رو یه گوشه سیو کنید یا برای عزیزانتون بفرستین تا اگه خدای نکرده تو چنین شرایطی قرار گرفتین، بدونید باید چیکار کنید: #آموزشی @DrTeL

🖕6,130🤣2,270❤127🗿33🫡30👎25👍21🔥15

14 Nov 2026, 22:31 UTC≈127,000 views5,085 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🇪🇺 نبرد تاج‌ها؛ ماتادور‌ها در مقابل سه‌شیرها، جایی که غرور اروپا فرداشب به چالش کشیده می‌شود!🔥 [ اسپانیا 🇪🇸 🆚🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿 انگلیس ] ⚽️ [ نکات کلیدی و مهم ]:👇 1⃣. برتری تاکتیکی اسپانیا: مالکیت توپ، گردش سریع و استفاده از فضاهای کناری، مهم‌ترین سلاح لاروخا برای تحت فشار گذاشتن انگلیس خواهد بود. 2⃣. جنگ ستاره‌ها در خط میانی: تقابل پدری و بلینگام می‌تواند نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در کنترل ریتم و خلق موقعیت داشته باشد. 3⃣. فرصت‌طل…

🖕5,050❤27👎4👍2🤣2

14 Nov 2026, 22:13 UTC≈127,000 views10,402 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Photo

🔴ارتش اسرائیل🇮🇱 دوباره حملات شدید خودشو به جنوب لبنان🇱🇧 شروع کرد : @DrTeL

🖕5,750🔥4,070🤣295❤100👏64💔57👍24🤬20

14 Nov 2026, 21:50 UTC≈132,000 views9,605 reactionsread 15 November 2026

‌ دیگه تا همینجاشو بلد بودم

🖕5,140🤣4,360😁33❤29💔11🔥9😭8🌚5

14 Nov 2026, 21:47 UTC≈132,000 views3,674 reactionsread 15 November 2026

اگه نت ها قطع شد چی ؟

🤣3,510😁44👍27❤21😭19👏14🤯12🤔11

14 Nov 2026, 21:44 UTC≈136,000 views9,173 reactions2 Starsread 15 November 2026
Photo

👨‍⚕اگه فردا از آسمون سنگ بباره، بمب اتم بزنن، جنگ جهانی سوم بشه و... من فردا رأس ساعت 10 شب این قرعه‌کشی رو برگزار می‌کنم؛ قوانین قرعه‌کشی هم مثل دفعه‌ی قبله، با این تفاوت که ربات این بار خیلی هوشمندتر شده. اگه بخواین حتی یه دونه ممبر فیک بیارین یا هر نوع تقلبی انجام بدین، از قرعه‌کشی حذف می‌شین و شاید حتی از کانال هم ریموو بشین! هرچی عضو قدیمی‌تری باشین، شانس بیشتری برای برنده شدن توی قرعه‌کشی دارین. به امید یه ق…

🖕5,240🤣3,430❤369👏43👍40🗿17🔥12👾9

14 Nov 2026, 21:32 UTC≈135,000 views9,975 reactionsread 15 November 2026

راست میگه دیگه بزارید کارشو بکنه ما هم آماده‌ایم

🖕5,140🤣4,730❤37🔥25😁17🦄9🤬5😐5

14 Nov 2026, 21:30 UTC≈136,000 views9,618 reactions2 Starsread 15 November 2026

‌ انقدر دلقک بازی فور نکنید تو کانال، هربار خواستم قرعه‌کشی کنم یه چرت و پرتی فور زدین تو کانال بعدش من بیخیال شدم، خواهشاً این بار جدی باشین بزارین من کارمو بکنم. #مدیریت

🖕5,290🤣4,100👍99❤65😁25🔥11👨‍💻10👏8

14 Nov 2026, 21:26 UTC≈138,000 views10,153 reactionsread 15 November 2026

تموم شد مبارک خیلیا

🖕5,120🤣4,910😁31❤26🔥17👍16🤷‍♀9💋8

14 Nov 2026, 21:23 UTC≈139,000 views9,851 reactions2 Starsread 15 November 2026

🔴فردا شب همگی ساعت 10 شب آنلاین باشید، قراره دور جدیدی از قرعه‌کشی رو شروع کنیم. #مدیریت

🖕5,210🤣4,220🤯224❤95🔥31😱27👍15💔15

14 Nov 2026, 21:04 UTC≈148,000 views11,135 reactionsread 15 November 2026
Video

🔴این زوج جوان و خوشبخت که نصف محتوای "اگه سینگلی به هیچ عنوان باز نکن" ما رو تأمین میکردن رو یادتونه؟ شکرخدا بالأخره کات کردن و حالا دختره داره از خاطرات‌شون تو دنیای واقعی میگه: هرچی واسم میخرید، قبلش باید از مامانش اوکی می‌گرفت. مثلا اگه ساعت 6 قرار داشتیم، آقا ساعت 9 می‌رسید. می‌رفتیم بیرون ازم دنگ می‌گرفت، مثلا می‌گفت این شماره کارتمه 2 بزن. بهم گفت کرجه ولی فهمیدم رفته باغشون، منم با پسرخالم اینا ریختیم اونجا …

🖕6,480🤣4,180😐220❤142💔42🤷‍♂19😢17🗿11

Showing the 12 most recent of 2,761 posts we hold for @drtel. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Posts edited after publishing

@drtel edited 4 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
16 August 2026
Most recent edit
6 October 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 5 posts on @drtel as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
1 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
14 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

3 Nov 2026, 20:34 UTCAnonymous Poll59,800 voters approx.

🔴تقریبا سه روز از چالش NNN# گذشت؛ داداشا اعلام وضعیت کنید ببینیم چند چندیم؟

  1. ✅ سنگر همچنان پر قدرت حفظ شده، بریم واسه روز چهارم37%
  2. ❌ متاسفانه امروز مجبور به ترک چالش شدم، آرزوی موفقیت واسه بقیه اسکواد18%
  3. ❌ همون روز اول از قطار NNN پیاده شدم27%
  4. دخترم - دیدن نتایج13%
  5. ترنسم🏳️‍⚧️ - دیدن نتایج1%
  6. فمبويم - دیدن نتایج4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

1 Nov 2026, 20:36 UTCAnonymous Poll53,000 voters approx.

🔴تقريبا یک روز از چالش NNN# گذشت؛ داداشا اعلام وضعیت کنید ببینیم چند چندیم؟

  1. ✅ سنگر پرقدرت حفظ شده، بریم واسه روز دوم52%
  2. ❌ متاسفانه بند رو آب دادم و از دور رقابت خارج شدم31%
  3. دخترم - دیدن نتایج11%
  4. ترنسم🏳️‍⚧️ - دیدن نتایج2%
  5. فمبویم - دیدن نتایج4%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

20 Oct 2026, 18:34 UTCAnonymous Poll69,700 voters approx.

بنظر شما درحال حاضر پشت پرده چه چیزی درحال شکل گیریه؟

  1. جنگ78%
  2. توافق22%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 1,000 most recent posts we hold (the sample is capped at 1,000), published 10 October 2026 to 15 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 142 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Channels Telegram recommends alongside this one

Telegram’s own answer, not this register’s. When this register asks Telegram’s API what is similar to this channel, this is the list it returns, in the exact order Telegram returns it — never re-sorted by subscribers or by anything else this register measures. The relationship, and the order, are Telegram’s; we record them and date them, and make no claim of our own about which of these channels actually resemble this one.

𝗙𝗨𝗧𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜 𝟭𝟴+
@FUTBALLI18 · 477,716
#1
Futball Bad Tv ⚫
@futballbadtv · 318,260
#2
Proxy MTProto | پروکسی
@iMTProto · 7,734,028
#3
⚽ Sport Bad News
@SportBaadNews · 871,829
#4
Rap King
@rapking · 313,887
#5
iRo Proxy | پروکسی
@iRoProxy · 8,016,415
#6
FutballBadBoys
@FutballBadBoys · 107,666
#7
⚽️ بیست و دو | Bistodo
@bistodo · 406,885
#8
همکلاسی
@hamclasixii · 112
#9
RegaPlus
@RegaPlus · 1,517,748
#10
میم هاب | MemeHub
@MemeHubOriginal · 92,205
#11
[ Fun HipHop ]
@funhiphop · 287,517
#12
خبرفوری
@iran_efsha_news · 1,513,711
#13
Badgram | بدگرام
@badgram · 626,908
#14
رسانه افشا | اخبار جنگ
@EfshaKhabar · 280,963
#15
Rap God News
@RapGodNews · 180,642
#16
یِ دانش آموز
@Ye_DaneshAmoz · 1,009,450
#17
توییتی
@TweetyChannel · 823,784
#18
[ چه خبر؟ ]
@chekhabarre · 242,854
#19
پروکسی Proxy
@proxy_qavi · 3,242,000
#20
Sport Bad Tweet
@SportBadTweet · 136,761
#21
ایردراپ | Airdrop
@Airdropwhalle · 15,587
#22
دارک پروکسی | Proxy mtproto
@darkproxy · 4,545,118
#23
جوانان ایران
@ir_javan · 637,287
#24
MARIZ MEDI
@MARIZMEDIA · 54,506
#25
Feel
@akh_mam · 178,389
#26
RapTV
@raptv · 399,178
#27
کانال تکنولوژی هوش مصنوعی
@roidbest · 1,616,968
#28
Rap Plus News
@RapPlusNews · 85,091
#29
Futball Boys
@FutballBoys · 149,640
#30
جیمی جامپ | Jimmy jump
@JiimmyJump · 24,335
#31
توییت فوتبالی | بیست و دو
@bistodo_tweet · 29,384
#32
رادیوکصشر
@Radiokocsher · 1,121,786
#33
Bad Soccer
@badsoccer · 116,139
#34
توییتر فارسی
@officialpersiatwiter · 569,501
#35
Z RAP | زد رپ
@zZRap · 63,230
#36
GAIANDE NEWS | گاینده نیوز
@Gaiande_News · 149,667
#37
رسانه افشا | Efsha
@efshagari · 652,420
#38
اخبار کیری مهم
@KiriMohems · 277,036
#39
BAD SS
@Badss_ir · 47,609
#40
نابسامان
@nabe_saman · 672,073
#41
پروکسی ملی | Nova Proxy
@NPROXY · 2,250,493
#42
گیف و استیکر | gifkoshr
@gifkoshr · 76,940
#43
Sikimsportz ⚽️
@SikimSportz · 236,921
#44
Tweet+plus | توییت پلاس
@tweet_varzeshplus · 31,434
#45
هات نیوز | HotNews
@news_hut · 102,593
#46
سورس شت | Source Shit
@SourceShit · 79,581
#47
Ashkan Kagan
@ashkan_kagan · 119,985
#48
Lord Crypto | سیگنال کریپتو
@lordcryptovip · 754,799
#49
ما پسرا ™
@MaPesara · 15,978
#50
شومبولیسم...!
@koz_lism · 153,996
#51
چرچیل " Mr. Churchill
@Churchill_Tahlil · 235,175
#52
Meme Zone | میم زون
@MEMEZ0NE · 111,045
#53
𝗕𝗔𝗗𝗧𝗘𝗚 | اخبار جنگ | بد تگ
@BadTeg · 66,501
#54
مجله‌ نوبیتکس
@Nobitexmag · 146,533
#55
🔴 خبر فوری | اخبار لحظه ای | اخبار جنگ
@khabarforieh · 193,411
#56
Wallpaper | والپیپر
@wallpaper_4k3d · 548,681
#57
HipHopTweety | هیپ هاپ توییتی
@HipHopTweety · 275,895
#58
ورزش سه
@varzesh3 · 1,305,188
#59
Varzesh+plus | ورزش پلاس
@vaarzesh_plus · 317,288
#60
Hip X Hopi
@hip_hopi · 398,402
#61
‌ Do You Know | مجله ™
@razcom · 1,216,825
#62
بارسا | بارسلونا | Barca
@Barca_We · 261,774
#63
اخبار جنگ الونیوز AloNews
@alonews · 1,004,294
#64
جمهوری میم الاسکی
@meme_ol_ski · 218,011
#65
استقلال | Esteghlal
@EsteghlalFc_We · 331,420
#66
پروکسی دائمی تلگرام
@proxydaemi · 2,144,949
#67
رپ بد نیوز | RapBad Newz
@RapBad_Newz · 263,457
#68
رئال مادرید | Real Madrid
@Realmadrid_we · 273,049
#69
فوتبال ۳۶۰
@ft360_ir · 416,418
#70
Fantasy Arena
@fantasiball · 6,646
#71
RapCity
@rapcity · 82,473
#72
فوتبال برتر | لیگ ایران | بیست و دو
@bistodo_ir · 143,653
#73
ᴍᴇᴍᴡᴇ ʟᴀɴᴅ 🖤 میم لند
@Memwe_land · 22,719
#74
HipSoccer | هیپ ساکر
@HipSoccer · 3,532
#75
⚽️ 𝐍𝐚𝐛 𝐒𝐨𝐜𝐜𝐞𝐫 | ناب ساکر
@Nabsoccer · 37,279
#76
Tube Meme | تیوب میم
@Tube_Meme · 214,762
#77
AnimotionArt | انیموشن آرت
@animotionart · 490,829
#78
Pouriya Adroit
@olaghiadroit · 62,764
#79
Futball Fuck News | FFN
@Futball_Fuckk · 655,791
#80
DOGS Community
@dogs · 6,398,597
#81
Proxy MTProto
@proxymtproto · 11,855,186
#82
My Proxy | مای پروکسی
@Myporoxy · 4,548,188
#83

Read from Telegram’s recommendation API, most recently 8 August 2026. Telegram holds a list like this for a small and growing share of the register — how this is measured, and why most channel pages show nothing here.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

توئیتیسم | 𝗧𝘄𝗲𝗲𝘁𝗶𝘀𝗺𝗲
@Tweetismee · 18,789
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 1 October 2026
[ چگونه فرو نشویم ]
@AntiPoach · 19,928
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 25 September 2026
ⓀoD85
@kod85 · 18,736
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 18 September 2026
KiRie
@Hame_Chi_Kirie · 26,294
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 61 here — alongside 60 others — read 10 September 2026
فوت هاب | FutHub
@FutsHub · 37,943
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 57 here — alongside 56 others — read 28 August 2026
فوتبال آنلاین | اِمرِس 🔱
@emres_ir · 160,741
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 August 2026
اعلام وضعیت ایران
@vaziat_iran · 60,970
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 27 August 2026
پرشین تون | PersianToon
@PirseanToon · 62,511
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 24 August 2026
جرکینگ توییت
@Jerking_twitt · 50,314
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 23 August 2026
𝗕𝗔𝗗𝗧𝗘𝗚 | اخبار جنگ | بد تگ
@BadTeg · 66,501
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 18 August 2026
تریبون آزاد
@tribonfree · 83,459
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 18 August 2026
ویدلش | weedlashya
@weedlashya · 209,836
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
حاجی پَسند
@Haji_pasand · 104,718
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 August 2026
خبر 18+ | اخبار فوری جنگ
@khabari_18 · 2,578,100
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 11 August 2026
ریمیکس سیستمی | Nayab Music
@NAYAB_MUSIIC · 352,844
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
𝗙𝗨𝗧𝗕𝗔𝗟𝗟𝗜 𝟭𝟴+
@FUTBALLI18 · 477,716
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 85 here — alongside 84 others — read 10 August 2026
Badgram | بدگرام
@badgram · 626,908
Telegram ranks this channel #1 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 8 August 2026
Cinema Freak
@cinemaafreak · 216,371
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 72 here — alongside 71 others — read 18 September 2026
اِفراطی بی مَنطِق
@Efratibimantegh · 25,878
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 10 September 2026
Rapfa_Mafia™️🎙️🔊🏴‍☠️
@rapfa_mafia · 242,194
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 51 here — alongside 50 others — read 9 September 2026
Ellenor MOOD
@ellenormood · 36,406
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 1 September 2026
چن وقته فهمیدی که؟!
@chanvaghte · 40,822
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 66 here — alongside 65 others — read 29 August 2026
خبر کیری
@khabare_kiri · 43,188
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 28 August 2026
عمو تئوری
@TheoAmoory · 67,235
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 23 August 2026

This channel appears in 1,277 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total, of which the 24 where it ranks highest are shown above. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Domains linked from posts

One domain this channel’s own posts have linked to, measured by scanning the post bodies themselves — not the channel’s description, which is the separate Declared links section below when this entry has one. Appearing here is not a claim about who runs the linked site or why the channel linked to it; an advertisement, a news citation and a malicious link all leave the same kind of row.

sportn5b2.com2 posts · 5 August 2026 – 7 August 2026 · example post

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐃𝐫 𝐓𝐞𝐥” (@drtel), 780,182 subscribers as measured 14 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/drtel.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.